Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) (1) ·
Barker (2013b) (1) ·
Benbunan-Fich (1998) (1) ·
Bertrand (2007) (1) ·
Bjork (2004) (1) ·
Boulton et al. (2012) (1) ·
Danaher, Smith and Telang (2014) (1) ·
Hoffman, Izenma, and Lidicker (2007) (1) ·
Landes (2004) (1) ·
Landes and Posner (1989) (1) ·
Liebowitz (2011) (1) ·
NRC (2013) (1) ·
Nimmer (2003) (1) ·
Novos and Waldman (1984) (1) ·
Peitz and Waelbroeck (2006) (1) ·
Penney (2016) (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015) (1) ·
Priest and Klien (1984) (1) ·
Reichmann and Okediji (2012) (1) ·
Rogers and Szamosszegi (2010) (1) ·
SCP (1999) (1) ·
Schauer (1978) (1) ·
Siegfried (2004) (1) ·
Smith and Telang (2012) (1) ·
Solove (2006) (1) ·
Solove (2007) (1) ·
Stoycheff (2016) (1) ·
Waldfogel (2012) (1) ·
Willinsky (2006) (1)
D83: Search • Learning • Information and Knowledge • Communication • Belief (1) ·
K00: General (1) ·
K11: Property Law (2) ·
L17: Open Source Products and Markets (1) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (2) ·
M37: Advertising (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (2) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (6) ·
O38: Government Policy (1) ·
Other (8)
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) (1) ·
Boxofficemojo.com (1) ·
IMDb (1) ·
Indian Box Office Revenues (http://ibosnetwork.com/default.aspx) (1) ·
Indian Censor Board (http://cbfcindia.gov.in/) (1) ·
Literature review (1) ·
Movie2k.to (1) ·
OECD (GDP) (1) ·
US Copyright Office (1) ·
US Supreme Court case (1)
Canadian Centinnial Scholarship Fund (1) ·
Government of Canada (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
SSHRC (1) ·
This Report was prepared for APRA AMCOS, PPCA, Copyright Agency│Viscopy, Foxtel, News Corp Australia and Screenrights. (1) ·
This research was funded in part by a PSCCUNY grant #67792-00-36 and a Doctoral Student Research Grant from the CUNY Graduate Center. (1) ·
∗Support for this research by NBER’s Economics of Digitization and Copyright Initiative is gratefully acknowledged. (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (6) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (3) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (5) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (3)
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (5) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (2) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (2) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (3) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (3)
Showing below up to 8 results in range #1 to #8.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)