Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Studies > Data collection method:
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) 
& Cross country study:
Yes
& Cross country study:
Yes Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
A1: General Economics (1) ·
D02: Institutions: Design; Formation; and Operations (1) ·
D11: Consumer Economics: Theory (1) ·
D4: Market Structure and Pricing (1) ·
E01: Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth • Environmental Accounts (1) ·
E02: Institutions and the Macroeconomy (1) ·
K00: General (1) ·
K11: Property Law (1) ·
K40: General (1) ·
K41: Litigation Process (1) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (10) ·
K4: Legal Procedure; the Legal System; and Illegal Behavior (1) ·
K: Law and Economics (2) ·
L17: Open Source Products and Markets (2) ·
L1: Market Structure; Firm Strategy; and Market Performance (2) ·
L81: Retail and Wholesale Trade • e-Commerce (1) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (8) ·
L83: Sports • Gambling • Restaurants • Recreation • Tourism (1) ·
L86: Information and Internet Services • Computer Software (1) ·
L88: Government Policy (2) ·
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives (2) ·
O32: Management of Technological Innovation and R&D (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (5) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (33) ·
O38: Government Policy (19) ·
O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights (3) ·
O57: Comparative Studies of Countries (1) ·
Z11: Economics of the Arts and Literature (3) ·
Z18: Public Policy (1) ·
Z1: Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology (1) ·
Other (38)
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Arthur, W.B. (1994) (1) ·
Artnet (1) ·
Billboard Chart (1) ·
Case law (1) ·
Daniel, E. and Klimis, G.M. (1999) (1) ·
Dolfsma, W. (2000) (1) ·
European Commission Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules. 5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
Gale Directory of Databases (1) ·
Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (1) ·
Legislative review (1) ·
Literature review (2) ·
National studies (1) ·
Open letter from Steve Jobs and response from Tim Amoroso from Macrovision (1) ·
Pew Internet Project (1) ·
RIAA (1) ·
RIAJ (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (1) ·
Statutory exceptions (1)
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (2) ·
Correlation and Association (5) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (12) ·
Discourse Analysis (3) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Legal Analysis (18) ·
Meta-Analysis (1) ·
Multivariate Statistics (1) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (11) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (16) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (11) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (10) ·
Regression Analysis (2) ·
Textual Content Analysis (19) ·
Visual / Other Content Analysis (1)
Country:
Australia (2) ·
Brazil (2) ·
Bulgaria (1) ·
Canada (9) ·
China (1) ·
Denmark (2) ·
England (1) ·
Europe (1) ·
European Union (18) ·
France (1) ·
Germany (1) ·
Global (6) ·
Hungary (2) ·
India (3) ·
Italy (2) ·
Japan (6) ·
Korea (2) ·
Mexico (1) ·
Norway (1) ·
Philippines (1) ·
South Africa (1) ·
South Korea (1) ·
Spain (1) ·
Switzerland (2) ·
Thailand (1) ·
The Netherlands (2) ·
Turkey (2) ·
United Kingdom (13) ·
United States (16)
Cross country study: (Click arrow to add another value)
Time period of data collection:
1968-1972 (1) ·
1994-1997 (1) ·
1996-2000 (1) ·
2003-2004 (1) ·
2004 (1) ·
2004 to 2014 (1) ·
2006 (2) ·
2007 (1) ·
2010 (1) ·
2010-2011 (1) ·
2012 (1) ·
2012 to 2013 (1) ·
2012-2013 (5) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (4) ·
2014-2015 (2) ·
2015 (1) ·
2015-2016 (1) ·
5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
Data was collected over two weeks in 2012. (1) ·
July 2006 and 2010 (1) ·
Not stated. (1) ·
November 2009 (1) ·
November 2011 – May 2012 (1) ·
October 2014 - September 2015 (1) ·
September to December 2012 (1)
Funder:
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
European Commission (11) ·
European Parliament (1) ·
Ford Foundation (1) ·
Google Inc. (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (2) ·
International Development Research Centre (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (1) ·
Open Society Foundations (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
The financial support for this project was given by the Leverholm Trust and the Herchel Smith Intellectual Property Research Fund, Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (3) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (31) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (7) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (6) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (19) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (19)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (14) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (13) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (7) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (21) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (7) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (14)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Authors (1) ·
Case study (1) ·
Company (2) ·
Competition agencies (1) ·
Consumer (1) ·
Country (7) ·
Creators (1) ·
Cultural Institution Staff (1) ·
Cultural Institutions (1) ·
Experts (1) ·
Focus group (1) ·
Focus of the study is the domestic market for recorded music in the USA. (1) ·
Individual (7) ·
Individual Responses (1) ·
Internet Platforms (1) ·
Interviews (1) ·
Legal experts (1) ·
Multinational music firms (1) ·
Museums (1) ·
Organisations (2) ·
Organizations (1) ·
P2P users (1) ·
PSI re-users (1) ·
Questionnaires (1) ·
Research models (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Stakeholders (8)
Data material year:
1968-1972 (1) ·
1994-1997 (1) ·
1996-2000 (1) ·
2003-2004 (1) ·
2004 (1) ·
2006 (3) ·
2007 (1) ·
2009 (1) ·
2010 (3) ·
2012 (5) ·
2012 to 2013 (1) ·
2012-2013 (3) ·
2013 (6) ·
2014 (5) ·
2014-2015 (2) ·
2015 (1) ·
2015-2016 (1) ·
5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
November 2011 – May 2012 (1) ·
October 2014 - September 2015 (1) ·
Unknown (1)
Data industry:
Computer consultancy (1) ·
Computer programming (3) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (13) ·
Cultural education (4) ·
Film and motion pictures (12) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (5) ·
Photographic activities (6) ·
Programming and broadcasting (3) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (17) ·
Software publishing (10) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (17) ·
Television programmes (9)
Showing below up to 38 results in range #1 to #38.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
