Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Alliance for IP (1) ·
Anti-Copying in Design (1) ·
Anti-Counterfeiting Group (1) ·
Artists’ Collecting Society (1) ·
Australian Society of Authors (1) ·
BV Musikindustrie (1) ·
BV Phono (1) ·
Big Innovation Centre (1) ·
British Copyright Council (1) ·
British Library (1) ·
British Phonographic Industry (1) ·
British Screen Advisory Council (1) ·
Copyright Licensing Agency (1) ·
Copyright laws (1) ·
Crown Prosecution Service (1) ·
Dusollier (2010) (1) ·
Federation Against Copyright Theft (1) ·
Federation Against Software Theft (1) ·
Hugenholtz (2013) (1) ·
Literature review (3) ·
Ministry of Justice (1) ·
Motion Picture Association (1) ·
Musikindustrie (1) ·
Newspaper Licensing Association (1) ·
Open Data Institute (1) ·
Open Rights Group (1) ·
PRS for Music (1) ·
Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (1) ·
Publishers Association (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (2) ·
Trading Standards (1) ·
UK Interactive Entertainment (1) ·
UK Music (1) ·
Various (1)
Data collection method:
Case Study (3) ·
Document Research (3) ·
Ethnography (3) ·
Experimental (Laboratory) (1) ·
Focus Groups (2) ·
Longitudinal Study (1) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (16) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (4) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (10) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (4) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (15) ·
Snowball sampling (1) ·
Structured Interview (3) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (12) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (10) ·
Unstructured Interview (2) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (2)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (1) ·
Correlation and Association (3) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (7) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (2) ·
Grounded Theory (3) ·
Legal Analysis (10) ·
Multivariate Statistics (2) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (15) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (15) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (10) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (6) ·
Regression Analysis (4) ·
Textual Content Analysis (11)
Country:
Australia (1) ·
Belgium (1) ·
Canada (4) ·
China (1) ·
Denmark (3) ·
European Union (1) ·
France (2) ·
Germany (4) ·
Global (1) ·
Hungary (2) ·
India (1) ·
Ireland (2) ·
Italy (1) ·
Japan (2) ·
Korea (1) ·
Luxembourg (1) ·
Mexico (1) ·
Netherlands (1) ·
Poland (1) ·
Spain (1) ·
Switzerland (2) ·
The Netherlands (2) ·
United Kingdom (19) ·
United States (17)
Time period of data collection:
1984 - 2013 (1) ·
2006 (2) ·
2006-2013 (1) ·
2007 (1) ·
2007 to 2008 (1) ·
2007-2010 (1) ·
2010 (3) ·
2011 (2) ·
2012 (2) ·
2012-2013 (3) ·
2013 (1) ·
2014 (4) ·
2015 (3) ·
April 2010 - September 2011 (2) ·
Between May and July 2014. (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
November 2011 – May 2012 (1)
Funder:
Arts and Humanities Research Council (1) ·
Consumer Focus (1) ·
European Commission (2) ·
IPO (2) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (2) ·
NSF Award #121634 (1) ·
None stated (2) ·
Not stated (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (22) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (15) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (6) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (11) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (11)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (12) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (12) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (7) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (11) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (10) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (10)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Artists (1) ·
Cases (1) ·
Chefs (1) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Company (2) ·
Countries (1) ·
Country (1) ·
Creative businesses (1) ·
Creators (1) ·
Fans (1) ·
Individual (13) ·
Individual Copyright Offences (1) ·
Interview (1) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Kickstarter projects (2) ·
Museums (3) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Organisations (2) ·
Projects (1) ·
Publications (1) ·
Stakeholders (4) ·
Wikipedia pages (2) ·
Work made for hire cases (1) ·
Years of iTunes selling digital songs and videos (1)
Data material year:
Data industry: (Click arrow to add another value)
Showing below up to 36 results in range #1 to #36.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
