Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Studies > Year 
:
2013 or
2014
& Data collection method:
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences)
:
2013 or
2014
& Data collection method:
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year: (Click arrow to add another value)
Related to:
Discipline:
C80: General (1) ·
D11: Consumer Economics: Theory (1) ·
D12: Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis (1) ·
E01: Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth • Environmental Accounts (1) ·
E02: Institutions and the Macroeconomy (1) ·
K11: Property Law (1) ·
K40: General (1) ·
K41: Litigation Process (2) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (6) ·
K4: Legal Procedure; the Legal System; and Illegal Behavior (1) ·
K: Law and Economics (2) ·
L15: Information and Product Quality • Standardization and Compatibility (1) ·
L17: Open Source Products and Markets (1) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (6) ·
L83: Sports • Gambling • Restaurants • Recreation • Tourism (1) ·
L88: Government Policy (1) ·
O1: Economic Development (1) ·
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives (1) ·
O32: Management of Technological Innovation and R&D (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (4) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (25) ·
O38: Government Policy (10) ·
O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights (1) ·
O57: Comparative Studies of Countries (1) ·
Z11: Economics of the Arts and Literature (2) ·
Z13: Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology • Social and Economic Stratification (1) ·
Z18: Public Policy (1) ·
Z1: Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology (1) ·
Other (26)
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (1) ·
Correlation and Association (4) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (9) ·
Discourse Analysis (1) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Legal Analysis (11) ·
Meta-Analysis (1) ·
Multivariate Statistics (1) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (8) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (10) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (10) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (5) ·
Regression Analysis (3) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (1) ·
Textual Content Analysis (11)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
2004 to 2014 (1) ·
2007-2008 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2012 (1) ·
2012 to 2013 (1) ·
2012-2013 (5) ·
2013 (4) ·
2014 (4) ·
5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
July 2006 and 2010 (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
November 2011 – May 2012 (1) ·
October 3-8, 2012 (1) ·
September 2012 - August 2013 (1) ·
September to December 2012 (1) ·
The data cover the period May-October 2012, mainly by combining two waves of data: May-July and August-October 2012. (1)
Funder:
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
European Commission (3) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (1) ·
National Science Foundation EAGER (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Ofcom (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2) ·
University of Minnesota (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (14) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (8) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (3) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (8) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (17)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (9) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (7) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (3) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (10) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (5) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (12)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Case study (1) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Competition agencies (1) ·
Country (2) ·
Experts (1) ·
Focus group (1) ·
IP rights (1) ·
Individual (7) ·
Individual Responses (1) ·
Internet Platforms (1) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Legal experts (1) ·
Museums (1) ·
Music services (1) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Organisations (2) ·
PSI re-users (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Stakeholders (3) ·
University students (2)
Data material year:
Data industry:
Computer programming (1) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (10) ·
Cultural education (1) ·
Film and motion pictures (8) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (3) ·
Photographic activities (2) ·
Programming and broadcasting (3) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (10) ·
Software publishing (9) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (12) ·
Television programmes (9)
Showing below up to 26 results in range #1 to #26.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
