Difference between revisions of "2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?"
From Copyright EVIDENCE
m (Andrew moved page Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? to [[2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g...) |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 23:35, 19 August 2015
Fundamental Issues | |
|
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? is a fundamental issue defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.
The following studies involve this issue (168):
Citation | |
---|---|
Aguilar (2019a) | Aguilar, A. (2019) The collective management of performers’ rights in the UK: a story of competing interests. Scripted 16(1) DOI: 10.2966/scrip.160119.4 |
Ahn and Yooney (2008) | Ahn, Illtae, and Kiho Yoon. On the impact of digital music distribution. CESifo Economic Studies 55.2 (2009): 306-325. |
Akerlof, Hahn and Litan (2002) | Akerlof, G. A., Arrow, K. J., Bresnahan, T., Buchanan, J. M., Coase, R., Cohen, L. R. & Hemphill, C. S. (2002). The copyright term extension act of 1998: An economic analysis. Washington DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. |
Arai and Kinukawa (2014) | Arai, Y. and Kinukawa, S., 2014. Copyright infringement as user innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), pp.131-144. |
Aufderheide and Jaszi (2004) | Aufderheide, P., & Jaszi, P. (2004). Untold stories: Creative consequences of the rights clearance culture for documentary filmmakers. |
Aufderheide and Sinnreich (2015) | Aufderheide, P., & Sinnreich, A. (2015). Documentarians, fair use, and free expression: changes in copyright attitudes and actions with access to best practices. Information, Communication & Society, (ahead-of-print), 1-10. |
Aufderheide, Milosevic and Bello (2015) | Aufderheide, P., Milosevic, T., & Bello, B. (March 11, 2015). The Impact of Copyright Permissions Culture on the U.S. Visual Arts Community: The Consequences of Fear of Fair Use. New Media & Society. |
Aufderheide, Sinnreich, Imperiale, and Silvernail (2016) | Aufderheide, P., Sinnreich, A., Imperiale, L., Silvernail, C. (2016). Norms-Shifting on Copyright and Fair Use in The Visual Arts Community. Visual Arts Review (Winter 2018). |
Azoulay, Graff Zivin and Manso (2009) | Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Manso, G. (2011). Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 527-554. |
Balganesh, Manta and Wilkinson-Ryan (2014) | Balganesh, S., Manta, I., & Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2014). Judging similarity. 100 Iowa Law Review 267; University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-15; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-09. Available at SSRN 2409811. |
Band and Gerafi (2013) | Band, J. & Gerafi, J. (2013). Foreign ownership of firms in IP intensive industries. Policy Bandwidth. Available at SSRN 2333839. |
Banerjee, Banerjee and Raychaudhuri (2008) | Banerjee, Dyuti S., and Ajitava Raychaudhuri. OPTIMAL ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI‐COPYING STRATEGIES TO COUNTER COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Japanese Economic Review 59.4 (2008): 519-535. |
Banks and Humphreys (2008) | Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The Labour of User Co-Creators Emergent Social Network Markets?. Convergence: the International Journal of research into New Media technologies, 14(4), 401-418. |
Bar-Ziv (2021) | Bar-Ziv, S. (2021). A content analysis approach to intellectual property research. In I. Calboli & M. L. Montagnani (Eds.), Handbook on Intellectual Property Research (pp. 31-46). Oxford University Press. |
Bechtold (2013) | Bechtold, S., 2013. The fashion of TV show formats. |
Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016) | Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming. |
Belleflamme (2002) | Belleflamme, Paul. Pricing information goods in the presence of copying. U of London Queen Mary Economics Working Paper 463 (2002). |
Belleflamme, Omrani and Peitz (2015) | Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N. and Peitz, M., 2015. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, pp.11-28. |
Boldrin and Levine (2005) | Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2005). Intellectual property and the efficient allocation of social surplus from creation. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2(1), 45-67. |
Brauneis and Oliar (2016) | Brauneis, R. and Olliar, D. (2016) Copyright’s Race, Gender and Age: A First Quantitative Look at Registrations. GWU Law School Public Law Research paper No. 2016-48 |
Breyer (1970) | Breyer, S., 1970. The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, pp.281-351. |
Buccafusco (2012) | Buccafusco, C. J. (2012). Making Sense of Intellectual Property Law. Cornell Law Review, 97, 501. |
Buccafusco and Sprigman (2010) | Buccafusco, C. J., & Sprigman, C. J. (2010). Valuing Intellectual Property: An Experiment. Cornell Law Review. |
Buccafusco, Burns, Fromer and Sprigman (2014) | Buccafusco, C. J., Burns, Z. C., Fromer, J. C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2014). Experimental Tests of Intellectual Property Laws’ Creativity Thresholds. Texas Law Review, 93, 1921. |
Butler, Aufderheide, Jaszi and Cox (2019) | Butler, B., Aufderheide, P., Jaszi, P., & Cox, K. (2019). Cracking the Copyright Dilemma in Software Preservation: Protecting Digital Culture through Fair Use Consensus? Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship, 3(3), 1-23. |
Cameron and Bazelon (2013) | Cameron, L., & Bazelon, C. (2013). The impact of digitization on business models in copyright driven industries: a review of economic issues. Brattle Groupe paper prepared for the US National Research Council, available at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_063398.pdf. |
Cantatore (2014) | Cantatore, F. (2014). From vault to honesty box: Australian authors and the changing face of copyright. Bond Law Review, 25(1), 5. |
Carrier (2012) | Carrier, M. A. (2012). Copyright and innovation: The untold story. Wisconsin Law Review 891. Available at SSRN 2099876 |
Castañer and Campos (2002) | Castañer, X. and Campos, L., 2002. The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(1), pp.29-52. |
Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2006) | Centre for intellectual property and information law. (2006). Review of the Economic Evidence Relating to an Extension of the Term of Copyright in Sound Recordings. University of Cambridge |
Charness and Daniela (2014) | Charness, G., & Grieco, D. (2014). Creativity and Financial Incentives. |
Cheliotis (2007) | Cheliotis, G. (2007). Remix culture: an empirical analysis of creative reuse and the licensing of digital media in online communities. |
Chiang and Assane (2002) | Chiang, E., & Assane, D. (2002). Software copyright infringement among college students. Applied Economics, 34(2), 157-166. |
Cuntz (2018) | Cuntz, A. (, 2018). Creator’s Income Situation in the Digital Age. LIS Working Papers 755, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg. |
David (1993) | David, P. A. 1993. “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’ s Thumb: Patents , Copyrights and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History”, in M. Wallerstein, M. Mogee and R. Schoen (eds .), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology . Washington DC: National Academy Press; 19-61. |
DiCola (2013) | DiCola, P. (2013). Money from Music: Survey Evidence on Musicians' Revenue and Lessons About Copyright Incentives. Ariz. L. Rev., 55, 301. |
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2021) | DCMS (2021) Economics of Music Streaming. House of Commons |
Djekic and Loebbecke (2005) | DJEKIC, P. and LOEBBECKE, C. 2005. Software piracy prevention through digital rights management systems. In: MULLER, G. and LIN, K. J. (eds.) CEC 2005: Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology, Proceedings. Munich, Germany. |
Doseva, Schmid-Petri, Schillmöller, Heckmann (2022) | Doseva, S. & Schmid-Petri, H. & Schillmöller, J. & Heckmann, D. (2022). Uploaders' perceptions of the German implementation of the EU copyright reform and their preferences for copyright regulation. Internet Policy Review, 11(4). |
Durham, Hirshleifer, Smith (1998) | Durham, Yvonne, Jack Hirshleifer, and Vernon L. Smith. Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? Experimental tests of a model of power. The American Economic Review 88.4 (1998): 970-983. |
Edwards, Klein, Lee, Moss and Philip (2015) | Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G., & Philip, F. (2015). Discourse, justification and critique: towards a legitimate digital copyright regime?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(1), 60-77. |
Erickson and Kretschmer (2018) | Erickson, K. and Kretschmer, M. (2018) “This Video is Unavailable”: Analysing Copyright Takedown of User-Generated Content on YouTube. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law (JIPITEC), 9(1) |
Erickson, Heald, Homberg, Kretschmer and Mendis (2015) | Erickson, K., Heald, P. J., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain: An Empirical Assessment. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper. |
Erickson, Kretschmer and Mendis (2013) | Erickson, K., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2013). Copyright and the Economic Effects of Parody: An Empirical Study of Music Videos on the YouTube Platform and an Assessment of the Regulatory Options. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, (2013/24). |
Erickson, Rodriguez Perez and Rodriguez Perez (2018) | Erickson, K, Rodriguez Perez, F and Rodriguez Perez, J (2018) What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. OpenSym ’18: The 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 22-24 Aug 2018, Paris, France. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). ISBN 978-1-4503-59 36-8 |
European Commission (2011a) | Report on the Implementation and Effect of the Resale Right Directive (2001/84/EC), European Commission (2011), available at |
European Commission (2013) | European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures |
Fagundes and Perzanowski (2019) | Fagundes, D. And Perzanowski, A. (2019) Clown Eggs. Notre Dame Law Review, 94(3). |
Faklaris and Hook (2017) | Faklaris, C. and Hook, S.A. (2017) Attitudes About ‘Fair Use’ and Content Sharing in Social Media Applications. CSCW 2017, February 25-March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA |
Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013) | Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498. |
... further results |
- Earnings literature.
- What is the link between legal rules and the kind of goods goods produced, even aesthetics (e.g. adaptation, sampling, co-authorship)?
- To what extent are creators users, and users creators (theories of communication)?