Computer programming

From Copyright EVIDENCE

This industry category includes the following:

62.01 Computer programming activities

This class includes the writing, modifying, testing and supporting of software.
This class includes:
-designing the structure and content of, and/or writing the computer code necessary to create and implement:
  • systems software (including updates and patches)
  • software applications (including updates and patches)
  • databases
  • web pages
- customising of software, i.e. modifying and configuring an existing application so that it is functional within the clients’ information system environment systems software (including updates and patches)
  • software applications (including updates and patches)
  • databases
  • web pages
- customising of software, i.e. modifying and configuring an existing application so that it is functional within the clients’ information system environment

Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix


Industry Sectors

Computer programming is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.


The following studies involve this industry sector (23):

 Citation
BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015)BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office.
Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016)Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming.
Breyer (1970)Breyer, S., 1970. The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, pp.281-351.
Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014)Collopy, D., Bastian, V., Drye, T., Koempel, F., Lewis, D., & Jenner, P. (2014). Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights.
Commission of the European Communities (2005a)DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005)
De Beer and Bouchard (2010)De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's' Orphan Works' Regime: Unlocatable Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215.
De Wolf and Partners (2013)Triaille, J.P., Dusollier, S., Depreeuw, S., Hubin, J.B. and De Francquen, A., 2013. Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society. InfoSoc Directive.
De Wolf and Partners (2014a)De Wolf & Partners, Study on the Legal Framework of Text and Data Mining (TDM) (2014).
European Commission (2014)Guidelines on Recommended Standard Licences, Datasets and Charging for the Reuse of Documents, European Commission 2014/C 240/01, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=6421.
Favale (2011)Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323
Gowers (2006)Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office.
Hargreaves (2011)Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity. A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth,
Hausberg and Spaeth (2018)Hausberg, J.P and Spaeth, S (2018) Why makers make what they make: motivations to contribute to open source hardware development. R&D Management.
Hill (2013)Hill, B. M. (2013). Almost Wikipedia: Eight Early Encyclopedia Projects and the Mechanisms of Collective Action.
Mattioli (2014)Mattioli, M. (2014). Disclosing Big Data. Minn. L. Rev., 99, 535.
Mustonen (2005)Mustonen, Mikko. When does a firm support substitute open source programming?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14.1 (2005): 121-139.
Quintais, De Gregorio and Magalhaes (2023) 2Quintais, J. P., De Gregorio, G., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). How platforms govern users’ copyright-protected content: Exploring the power of private ordering and its implications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48.
Roark (2010)Roark, M.L. (2010). Limitation of Sales Warranties as an Alternative to Intellectual Property Rights: An Empirical Analysis of iPhone Warranties' Deterrent Impact on Consumers. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., i.
Silbey (2014a)Silbey, J. (2014) The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford University Press: Stanford.
Siwek (2009)Siwek, S. E. (2009). Copyright Industries in the U.S. Economy: 2003-2007 Report. Economists Incorporated.
Stannard (2015)Stannard, E. (2015). A Copyright Snapshot: the Impact of New Copyright Legislation on Information Professionals. Legal Information Management, 15(04), 233-239.
Von Hippel and Von Krogh (2003)Von Hippel, E. and Von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14(2), p. 209-223
Zhu, Madnick and Siegel (2008)Zhu, Hongwei, Stuart E. Madnick, and Michael D. Siegel. An economic analysis of policies for the protection and reuse of noncopyrightable database contents. Journal of Management Information Systems 25.1 (2008): 199-232.