Specialised design

From Copyright EVIDENCE

This industry category includes the following:

74.1 Specialised design activities

74.10 Specialised design activities
This class includes:
- fashion design related to textiles, wearing apparel, shoes, jewellery, furniture and other interior decoration and other fashion goods as well as other personal or household goods
- industrial design, i.e. creating and developing designs and specifications that optimise the use, value and appearance of products, including the determination of the materials, mechanism, shape, colour and surface finishes of the product, taking into consideration human characteristics and needs, safety, market appeal in distribution, use and maintenance
- activities of graphic designers
- activities of interior decorators


Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix


Industry Sectors

Specialised design is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.


The following studies involve this industry sector (19):

 Citation
Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016)Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming.
Brassell and Goodyer (2015)Brassell, M. & Goodyer, I. (2015) Penalty Fair? Study of criminal sanctions for copyright infringement available under the CDPA 1988. IPO, 2015
Bryce and Rutter (2005)Bryce, J., & Rutter, J. (2005). Fake Nation? A study into an everyday crime. The Intellectual Property Theft and Organised Crime research project, UK.
Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014)Collopy, D., Bastian, V., Drye, T., Koempel, F., Lewis, D., & Jenner, P. (2014). Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights.
Cotropia and Gibson (2014)Cotropia, C. A., & Gibson, J. (2014). Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation. Texas Law Review, 92(7).
Gowers (2006)Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office.
Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010)Greenhalgh, C., Philips, J., Pitkethly, R., Rogers, M., & Tomalin, J. (2010). Intellectual Property Enforcement in Smaller UK Firms. Report for the Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP).
Hargreaves (2011)Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity. A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth,
Hong (2007)Hong, S. H. (2007). The recent growth of the internet and changes in household-level demand for entertainment. Information Economics and Policy, 19(3), 304-318.
Humphreys (2008)Humphreys, S., 2008. The challenges of intellectual property for users of Social Networking Sites: a case study of Ravelry.
Lerner (2002)Lerner, J. (2002). Patent protection and innovation over 150 years (No. w8977). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mendis (2013)Mendis, D. (2013). The Clone Wars’: Episode 1: the rise of 3D printing and its implications for intellectual property law. Learning lessons from the past. European Intellectual Property Review, 35(3), 155-169.
Mendis, Secchi and Reeves (2015)Mendis, D., et al. (2015). A Legal and Empirical Study into the Intellectual Property Implications of 3D Printing.
Oriakhoba (2020)Desmond Osaretin Oriakhogba. (2020). Working around the Gender Gap in Intellectual Property Regimes: Empowerment of Women Beadworkers through Open, Inclusive Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. OpenAir Workign Paper 23.
Perzanowski (2017)Perzanowski, A., 'Owning the Body: Creative Norms in the Tattoo Industry', in Darling, K. and Perzanowski, A. (eds.), Creativity Without Law: Challenging the Assumptions of Intellectual Property, New York University Press, New York, 2017, pp. 208–276.
Raustiala and Sprigman (2006)Raustiala, K. and Sprigman, C.J. (2006) The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, 1687-1777
Rogers (2013)Rogers, E. (2013) Substantially Unfair: An Empirical Examination of Copyright Substantial Similarity Analysis among the Federal Circuits. Mich. St. L. Rev. 893
Sun et al. (2019)Sun, X. Zhou, X. Wang, Q. Tang, P. Law, E.L. and Cobb, S. (2019). Understanding attitudes towards intellectual property from the perspective of design professionals. Electronic Commerce Research, pp 1-23
Wang and Sun (2018)Wang, Q and Sun, X (2018) Exploring Chinese Design Business Owners’ Attitudes towards Intellectual Property Rights. International Journal of Innovation Management, November 2018.