Computer programming
From Copyright EVIDENCE
This industry category includes the following:
62.01 Computer programming activities
- This class includes the writing, modifying, testing and supporting of software.
- This class includes:
- -designing the structure and content of, and/or writing the computer code necessary to create and implement:
- systems software (including updates and patches)
- software applications (including updates and patches)
- databases
- web pages
- - customising of software, i.e. modifying and configuring an existing application so that it is functional within the clients’ information system environment systems software (including updates and patches)
- software applications (including updates and patches)
- databases
- web pages
- - customising of software, i.e. modifying and configuring an existing application so that it is functional within the clients’ information system environment
Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix
Industry Sectors | |
|
Computer programming is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.
The following studies involve this industry sector (23):
Citation | |
---|---|
BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015) | BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. |
Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016) | Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming. |
Breyer (1970) | Breyer, S., 1970. The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, pp.281-351. |
Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014) | Collopy, D., Bastian, V., Drye, T., Koempel, F., Lewis, D., & Jenner, P. (2014). Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights. |
Commission of the European Communities (2005a) | DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005) |
De Beer and Bouchard (2010) | De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's' Orphan Works' Regime: Unlocatable Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215. |
De Wolf and Partners (2013) | Triaille, J.P., Dusollier, S., Depreeuw, S., Hubin, J.B. and De Francquen, A., 2013. Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society. InfoSoc Directive. |
De Wolf and Partners (2014a) | De Wolf & Partners, Study on the Legal Framework of Text and Data Mining (TDM) (2014). |
European Commission (2014) | Guidelines on Recommended Standard Licences, Datasets and Charging for the Reuse of Documents, European Commission 2014/C 240/01, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=6421. |
Favale (2011) | Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323 |
Gowers (2006) | Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office. |
Hargreaves (2011) | Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity. A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, |
Hausberg and Spaeth (2018) | Hausberg, J.P and Spaeth, S (2018) Why makers make what they make: motivations to contribute to open source hardware development. R&D Management. |
Hill (2013) | Hill, B. M. (2013). Almost Wikipedia: Eight Early Encyclopedia Projects and the Mechanisms of Collective Action. |
Mattioli (2014) | Mattioli, M. (2014). Disclosing Big Data. Minn. L. Rev., 99, 535. |
Mustonen (2005) | Mustonen, Mikko. When does a firm support substitute open source programming?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14.1 (2005): 121-139. |
Quintais, De Gregorio and Magalhaes (2023) 2 | Quintais, J. P., De Gregorio, G., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). How platforms govern users’ copyright-protected content: Exploring the power of private ordering and its implications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48. |
Roark (2010) | Roark, M.L. (2010). Limitation of Sales Warranties as an Alternative to Intellectual Property Rights: An Empirical Analysis of iPhone Warranties' Deterrent Impact on Consumers. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., i. |
Silbey (2014a) | Silbey, J. (2014) The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford University Press: Stanford. |
Siwek (2009) | Siwek, S. E. (2009). Copyright Industries in the U.S. Economy: 2003-2007 Report. Economists Incorporated. |
Stannard (2015) | Stannard, E. (2015). A Copyright Snapshot: the Impact of New Copyright Legislation on Information Professionals. Legal Information Management, 15(04), 233-239. |
Von Hippel and Von Krogh (2003) | Von Hippel, E. and Von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14(2), p. 209-223 |
Zhu, Madnick and Siegel (2008) | Zhu, Hongwei, Stuart E. Madnick, and Michael D. Siegel. An economic analysis of policies for the protection and reuse of noncopyrightable database contents. Journal of Management Information Systems 25.1 (2008): 199-232. |