O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
From Copyright EVIDENCE
| Disciplines |
| A full list of disciplines is available here |
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives is a discipline defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki. It is based on the JEL Discipline Classification System.
The following studies are coded as being associated with this discipline (25):
| Citation | |
|---|---|
| Akerlof, Hahn and Litan (2002) | Akerlof, G. A., Arrow, K. J., Bresnahan, T., Buchanan, J. M., Coase, R., Cohen, L. R. & Hemphill, C. S. (2002). The copyright term extension act of 1998: An economic analysis. Washington DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. |
| Buccafusco and Sprigman (2010) | Buccafusco, C. J., & Sprigman, C. J. (2010). Valuing Intellectual Property: An Experiment. Cornell Law Review. |
| Buss and Peukert (2015) | Buss, P., & Peukert, C. (2015). R&D outsourcing and intellectual property infringement. Research Policy, 44(4), 977-989. |
| Carrier (2012) | Carrier, M. A. (2012). Copyright and innovation: The untold story. Wisconsin Law Review 891. Available at SSRN 2099876 |
| Commission of the European Communities (2005a) | DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005) |
| Cuntz and Bergquist (2020) | |
| DiCola and Touve (2014) | DiCola, P. C., & Touve, D. (2014). Licensing in the Shadow of Copyright. |
| Hall, Helmers, Rogers, and Sena (2014) | Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: a review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375-423. |
| Handke (2015) | Handke, C. (2015). Digitization and Competition in Copyright Industries: One Step Forward and Two Steps Back?. Homo Oeconomicus, 32. |
| Handke, Girard and Mattes (2015) | Handke, C., Girard, Y., & Mattes, A. (2015). Copyright and Innovation: Fit for Digitization?. DIW Economic Bulletin, 5(16). |
| Heald (2014a) | Heald, P. J. (2014). How Copyright Keeps Works Disappeared. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 829-866. |
| Intellectual Property Office (2019) | Intellectual Property Office; Ernst & Young LLP. (17 June 2019). Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights. |
| Kanwar and Evenson (2003) | Kanwar, S., & Evenson, R. (2003). Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?. Oxford Economic Papers, 235-264. |
| Karakaya (2011) | Karakaya, M. (2010). Analysis of the key reasons behind the pirated software usage of Turkish Internet users: Application of routine activities theory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Baltimore). |
| Lee (2012) | Lee, D. J. (2012). Precarious Creativity: Changing Attitudes Towards Craft and Creativity in the British Independent Television Production Sector. Creative Industries Journal, 4(2), 155-170 |
| Lemley (1997) | Lemley, M. A. (1997). The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law. Tex. L. Rev., 75, 989-1835. |
| Liebowitz and Margolis (2005) | Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (2005). Seventeen famous economists weigh in on copyright: The role of theory, empirics, and network effects. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 18(2). |
| Mandel, Fast and Olson (2015) | Mandel, Gregory N. and Fast, Anne A. and Olson, kristina, Intellectual Property Law's Plagiarism Fallacy (May 12, 2015). Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-22. |
| Pollock (2009) | Pollock, R. 2009. “Forever Minus a Day? Calculating Optimal Copyright Term”. Review of Economic Researchon CopyrightIssues 6(1); 35-60. |
| Scotchmer (2011) | Scotchmer, S. (2011). Ideas and Innovations: Which should be subsidized?. Available at SSRN 1755091. |
| Shavell and van Ypersele (1999) | Shavell, S. and Van Ypersele, T., 1999. Rewards versus intellectual property rights (No. w6956). National bureau of economic research. |
| Sicker, Ohm and Gunaji (2007) | Sicker, D., Ohm, P., Gunaji, S. (2007). The analog hole and the price of music: An empirical study. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5, 573-587. |
| United States Copyright Office (2015a) | Copyright and the Music Marketplace, United States Copyright Office (2015), available at http://copyright.gov/docs/musiclicensingstudy/copyright-and-the-music-marketplace.pdf. |
| United States Copyright Office (2015b) | Orphan Works and Mass Digitization, United States Copyright Office (2015), available at http://copyright.gov/orphan/reports/orphan-works2015.pdf. |
| Xia, Huang, Duan and Whinston (2012) | Mu Xia, Yun Huang, Wenjing Duan, Andrew B. Whinston, (2012) Research Note—To Continue Sharing or Not to Continue Sharing? An Empirical Analysis of User Decision in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Networks. Information Systems Research 23(1):247-259. |
