O38: Government Policy

From Copyright EVIDENCE
Disciplines
A full list of disciplines is available here

O38: Government Policy is a discipline defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki. It is based on the JEL Discipline Classification System.

The following studies are coded as being associated with this discipline (94):

 Citation
Aguiar, Claussen and Peukert (2018)Aguiar, L., Claussen, J. And Peukert, C. (2018) Catch Me if You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement. Information Systems Research, 29(3), pp 656-678
Akester (2009)Akester, P. (2009). Technological accommodation of conflicts between freedom of expression and DRM: the first empirical assessment. Available at SSRN 1469412.
Arai and Kinukawa (2014)Arai, Y. and Kinukawa, S., 2014. Copyright infringement as user innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), pp.131-144.
Astle and Muir (2002)Astle, P.J. and Muir, A., 2002. Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34(2), pp.67-79.
Attorney-General's Department (2008)Attorney-General's Department (Australia), 2008, Review of copyright exceptions for private copying of photographs and films - final report, Attorney-General's Department (Australia)
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)ALRC Report 122 (2013), available at http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/final_report_alrc_122_2nd_december_2013_.pdf.
Bently (2002)Bently, L. (2002). Between a rock and a hard place: The problems facing freelance creators in the UK media market–place. London: Institute of Employment Rights. ii. Canada.
Bezmen and Depken (2006)Bezmen, T. L., & Depken, C. A. (2006). Influences on software piracy: Evidence from the various United States. Economic Letters, 90(3), 356-361.
Brooks (2005)Brooks, T. (2005). Survey of reissues of US recordings. Council on Library and Information Resources.
Canat, Guibault and Logeais (2015)Canat, J., Guibault, L. and Logeais, E., Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) SCCR/30/2.
Cave, Deegan and Heinink (2000)Cave, M., Deegan, M. and Heinink, L., 2000. Copyright clearance in the refugee studies centre digital library project. RLG DigiNews, 4(5).
Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2016)Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2016), Response to Article 11 of the Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, entitled ‘Protection of press publications concerning digital uses’ on behalf of thirty seven professors and leading scholars of Intellectual Property, Information Law and Digital Economy
Commission of the European Communities (2005a)DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005)
Commission of the European Communities (2005b)Study on a Community Initiative on the Cross-border Collective Management of Copyright, Commission of the European Communities (2005), available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/management/study-collectivemgmt_en.pdf.
Corbett (2011)Corbett, S., 2011. Archiving Our Culture in a Digital Environment: Copyright Law and Digitisation Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions. New Zealand Law Foundation Report.
Crews (2015)Crews, K., Study on Copyright Limitations and Related Rights, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Thirtieth Session, SCCR/30/3 (2015).
Danahar, Smith and Teland (2015)Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R.,'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence and Conclusions', WIPO/ACE/10/20, 2015
De Wolf and Partners (2014b)Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-border Digital Transmissions, De Wolf & Partners (2014).
DiCola and Touve (2014)DiCola, P. C., & Touve, D. (2014). Licensing in the Shadow of Copyright.
Dickson (2010)Dickson, M., 2010. Due diligence, futile effort: Copyright and the digitization of the Thomas E. Watson papers. The American Archivist, 73(2), pp.626-636.
Dryden (2008)Dryden, J.E., 2008. Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
EIFL (2013)Electronic Information For Libraries - The European Orphan Works Directive An EIFL Guide (2013)
EY (2014)EY (2014) Creating Growth: Measuring Cultural and Creative Markets in the EU,
Engel and Kurschilgen (2010)Engel, C., & Kurschilgen, M. J. (2011). Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), pp682-708
European Commission (2011a)Report on the Implementation and Effect of the Resale Right Directive (2001/84/EC), European Commission (2011), available at
European Commission (2011b)European Commission Impact assessment on the cross-border online access to orphan works (Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2011) 615 (final)
European Commission (2013)European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures
European Commission (2014)Guidelines on Recommended Standard Licences, Datasets and Charging for the Reuse of Documents, European Commission 2014/C 240/01, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=6421.
European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010)European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010). Damages in Intellectual Property Rights.
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs (2015)European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs.
European Patent Office and Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (2013)Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries: Contribution to Economic Performance and Employment in the European Union, The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office (2013) available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/intellectual-property/docs/joint-report-epo-ohim-final-version_en.pdf.
Favale (2011)Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323
Gerhardt (2014)Gerhardt, D. R. (2014). Copyright at the Museum: Using the Publication Doctrine to Free Art and History. Available at SSRN 2505041.
Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)Guibault et al., Study on the Implementation and Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (2007)
Hadopi (2011)HADOPI. 2011. Hadopi, cultural assets and internet use: practices and perceptions of French internet users (Online). Available: http://www.hadopi.fr/download/HADOPI_T0_version_long.pdf.
Handke (2011)Handke, C. (2011). Economic Effects of Copyright: The Empirical Evidence So Far. Commissioned paper prepared for The Committee on the Impact of Copyright Policy on Innovation in the Digital Era.
Hansen, Hashimoto, Hinze, Samuelson and Urban (2013)Hansen, D. R., Hashimoto, K., Hinze, G., Samuelson, P., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Solving the orphan works problem for the united states. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 37(1).
Hansen, Hinze, and Urban (2013)Hansen, D. R., Hinze, G., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a'Diligent Search'under Present and Proposed Regimes?. Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project, White Paper, (4)
Hanway and Lyons (2003)Hanway, S., & Lyons, L. (2003). Teens OK With Letting Music Downloads Play. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing, 97.
Hazucha, Liu and Watabe (2013)Hazucha, B., Liu, H. and Watabe, T, Copyright, Technological Protection Measures and Their Acceptance by Consumers in Japan, SERCI Annual Congress Conference Paper (2013).
Hinduja and Ingram (2009)Hinduja, S., & Ingram, J. R. (2009). Social learning theory and music piracy: the differential role of online and offline peer influences. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 405-420.
IP Crime Annual Report (2012-2013)IP Crime Group (2013). IP Crime Annual Report (2012-2013).
IP Crime Annual Report (2013-2014)IP Crime Group (2014). IP Crime Annual Report (2013-2014).
IP Crime Annual Report (2014-2015)IP Crime Group (2015). IP Crime Annual Report (2014-2015).
IP Crime Annual Report (2015-2016)IP Crime Group (2016) IP Crime Annual Report (2015-2016)
IP Crime Annual Report (2016-2017)IP Crime Group (2017) IP Crime Annual Report (2016-2017)
IP Crime Annual Report (2017-2018)IP Crime Group (2018) IP Crime Annual Report (2017-2018)
Intellectual Property Office (2015a)Intellectual Property Office (2015). Unjustified threats on intellectual property rights: Government Response.
Intellectual Property Office (2015b)Intellectual Property Office (2015). Government response to the consultation on reducing the duration of copyright in certain unpublished works.
Intellectual Property Office (2015c)Intellectual Property Office, Intellectual Property Awareness Study (2015)
... further results