Difference between revisions of "Mustonen (2005)"

From Copyright EVIDENCE
(Saved using "Save and continue" button in form)
 
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Author=Mikko Mustonen
 
|Author=Mikko Mustonen
 
|Title=When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Programming?
 
|Title=When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Programming?
 +
|Full Citation=Mustonen, Mikko. When does a firm support substitute open source programming?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14.1 (2005): 121-139.
 +
|Abstract=Software firms are observed to support programmers’ communities, which
 +
develop rival open source programs. A firm selling a copyright program has an
 +
incentive to support substitute copyleft programming when support creates
 +
compatibility between the programs and programs exhibit network effects.
 +
Costly compatibility benefits the firm as its consumers gain access to the
 +
community’s services but may also hurt the firm because it cannot profit
 +
from the valuation difference between incompatible networks. The incentive
 +
arises under a weak network effect even when the consumers’ benefit is small.
 +
Standardization and enlarging the open source programmers’ community do
 +
not always increase welfare.
 
|Authentic Link=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2005.00036.x/abstract
 
|Authentic Link=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2005.00036.x/abstract
 
|Cross-country=No
 
|Cross-country=No

Revision as of 09:58, 9 April 2016

Advertising Architectural Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing Programming and broadcasting Computer programming Computer consultancy Creative, arts and entertainment Cultural education Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities

Film and motion pictures Sound recording and music publishing Photographic activities PR and communication Software publishing Video game publishing Specialised design Television programmes Translation and interpretation

1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)

A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Source Details

Mustonen (2005)
Title: When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Programming?
Author(s): Mikko Mustonen
Year:
Citation: Mustonen, Mikko. When does a firm support substitute open source programming?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14.1 (2005): 121-139.
Link(s): Definitive ,
Key Related Studies:
Discipline:
Linked by:
About the Data
Data Description:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Sources:
Data Collection Methods:
Data Analysis Methods:
Industry(ies):
Country(ies):
Cross Country Study?: No
Comparative Study?: No
Literature review?: No
Government or policy study?: No
Time Period(s) of Collection:
Funder(s):

Abstract

Software firms are observed to support programmers’ communities, which develop rival open source programs. A firm selling a copyright program has an incentive to support substitute copyleft programming when support creates compatibility between the programs and programs exhibit network effects. Costly compatibility benefits the firm as its consumers gain access to the community’s services but may also hurt the firm because it cannot profit from the valuation difference between incompatible networks. The incentive arises under a weak network effect even when the consumers’ benefit is small. Standardization and enlarging the open source programmers’ community do not always increase welfare.

Main Results of the Study

Policy Implications as Stated By Author

Coverage of Study

Coverage of Fundamental Issues
Issue Included within Study
Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare
Green-tick.png
Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?
Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors)
Green-tick.png
Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption)
Green-tick.png
Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)
Coverage of Evidence Based Policies
Issue Included within Study
Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right)
Green-tick.png
Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)
Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)
Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
Green-tick.png
Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Datasets