Poort et al. (2014)

From Copyright EVIDENCE

Advertising Architectural Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing Programming and broadcasting Computer programming Computer consultancy Creative, arts and entertainment Cultural education Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities

Film and motion pictures Sound recording and music publishing Photographic activities PR and communication Software publishing Video game publishing Specialised design Television programmes Translation and interpretation

1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)

A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Source Details

Poort et al. (2014)
Title: Baywatch: Two approaches to measure the effects of blocking access to The Pirate Bay
Author(s): Poort, J., Leenheer, J., van der Ham, J., Dumitru, C.
Year: 2014
Citation: Poort, J., Leenheer, J., van der Ham, J., and Dumitru, C. (2014) Baywatch: Two approaches to measure the effects of blocking access to The Pirate Bay. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), pp 383-392
Link(s): Definitive
Key Related Studies:
Discipline:
Linked by: Danaher et al. (2019), Poort and Weda (2015)
About the Data
Data Description: Data were obtained from two surveys issued to the Dutch population using a random sampling method. The multi-period measurements of the survey were designed to test reactions to blocking access to websites after 3, 6, and 10 months. The study notes 2009 respondents to the first survey, 2422 for the second, and 1692 respective respondents to both. The survey data was complemented with intermittent monitoring of BitTorrent data for Dutch users in the post-block period.
Data Type: Primary data
Secondary Data Sources:
Data Collection Methods:
Data Analysis Methods:
Industry(ies):
Country(ies):
Cross Country Study?: No
Comparative Study?: No
Literature review?: No
Government or policy study?: No
Time Period(s) of Collection:
  • May 2012 – February 2013
  • April 2012 – February 2013
Funder(s):
  • The Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  • Ziggo
  • KPN
  • XS4ALL
  • DELTA
  • CAIW
  • the Royal Dutch Book Trade Association
  • SOS Internet

Abstract

“In the fight against unauthorised sharing of copyright protected material, Dutch Internet Service Providers have been summoned by courts to block their subscribers' access to The Pirate Bay and related sites. This paper studies the effectiveness of this approach towards online copyright enforcement, using both a consumer survey and a newly developed non-infringing technology for BitTorrent monitoring. While a small group of respondents download less from illegal sources or claim to have stopped doing so, no impact is found on the percentage of the Dutch population downloading from illegal sources. Slight changes are found on the distribution of Dutch peers, but these seem related to the awareness raised by blocking rather than the blocking itself.”

Main Results of the Study

• The majority of those who download or intend to download from illegal sources (this in itself a small percentage of the overall population) are largely non-responsive to blocking access to piracy sites (with 70-72% of this segment reporting no change in their downloading behaviours).
• The percentage of downloads of films and series, books and games increased as time went on post-block (approx.. 15.7% - 22.5% in the 6-10 month post-block span). Downloads of music post-block remained consistent. The study suggests that this increase in downloads means the initial awareness and effectiveness of the blocking period is short-lived.

Policy Implications as Stated By Author

The study suggests that, rather than using blocking interventions to stop unauthorised file sharing, policy makers and content creators should ‘focus on removing any legal or practical obstacles for comprehensive and attractive legal online models’.



Coverage of Study

Coverage of Fundamental Issues
Issue Included within Study
Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare
Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?
Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors)
Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption)
Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)
Green-tick.png
Coverage of Evidence Based Policies
Issue Included within Study
Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right)
Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)
Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)
Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)
Green-tick.png

Datasets

{{{Dataset}}}