Difference between revisions of "Smith and Telang (2012)"
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Authentic Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2132153 | |Authentic Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2132153 | ||
|Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2132153 | |Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2132153 | ||
− | |Reference= | + | |Reference=Liebowitz (1985); Takeyama (1994); Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf (2007); Peitz and Waelbroeck (2004); |
|Plain Text Proposition=To summarize, while the academic literature is not uniform in finding harm, taken as a whole we see a very consistent story across the academic literature: With one exception, all of the papers we are aware of which have been published in major peer-reviewed academic journals find evidence of statistically significant harm to sales of recently released content as a result of illegal file sharing. These papers span a variety of methods, time periods, and contexts. Moreover, while the one dissenting paper should be lauded for innovative methods of data collection, and for being among the very first papers published addressing this question, there have been significant questions raised about the appropriateness of its instrumental variable, and as such we believe it is appropriate to weigh its finding that piracy does not harm sales relative to the large number of papers with opposite findings. | |Plain Text Proposition=To summarize, while the academic literature is not uniform in finding harm, taken as a whole we see a very consistent story across the academic literature: With one exception, all of the papers we are aware of which have been published in major peer-reviewed academic journals find evidence of statistically significant harm to sales of recently released content as a result of illegal file sharing. These papers span a variety of methods, time periods, and contexts. Moreover, while the one dissenting paper should be lauded for innovative methods of data collection, and for being among the very first papers published addressing this question, there have been significant questions raised about the appropriateness of its instrumental variable, and as such we believe it is appropriate to weigh its finding that piracy does not harm sales relative to the large number of papers with opposite findings. | ||
|FundamentalIssue=5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media), 1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare, 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?, | |FundamentalIssue=5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media), 1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare, 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?, | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|Intervention-Response=Based on our review of the empirical literature we conclude that, while some papers in the literature find no evidence of harm, the vast majority of the literature (particularly the literature published in top peer reviewed journals) finds evidence that piracy harms media sales. | |Intervention-Response=Based on our review of the empirical literature we conclude that, while some papers in the literature find no evidence of harm, the vast majority of the literature (particularly the literature published in top peer reviewed journals) finds evidence that piracy harms media sales. | ||
|Description of Data=This study is a literature review and has no original data. | |Description of Data=This study is a literature review and has no original data. | ||
− | |Data Year=1991 | + | |Data Year=1991-2012 |
|Industry=Software publishing (including video games); Sound recording and music publishing; Film and motion pictures; | |Industry=Software publishing (including video games); Sound recording and music publishing; Film and motion pictures; | ||
|Country=Global; | |Country=Global; | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|Government or policy=No | |Government or policy=No | ||
|Literature review=Yes | |Literature review=Yes | ||
− | |Funded By= | + | |Funded By=Motion Picture Association of America; |
}} | }} | ||
|Dataset= | |Dataset= | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 06:23, 8 October 2016
Contents
Source Details
Smith and Telang (2012) | |
Title: | Assessing the Academic Literature Regarding the Impact of Media Piracy on Sales |
Author(s): | Michael D. Smith, Rahul Telang |
Year: | 2012 |
Citation: | Smith, M.D. and Telang, R., 2012. Assessing the academic literature regarding the impact of media piracy on sales. Available at SSRN 2132153. |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: | Peukert, Claussen and Kretschmer (2015), Poort and Weda (2015), Poort et al. (2014) |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | This study is a literature review and has no original data. |
Data Type: | |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | No |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | Yes |
Government or policy study?: | No |
Time Period(s) of Collection: |
|
Funder(s): |
|
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to provide a “non‐technical” discussion of what the academic literatures in economics, marketing, and information systems can tell us about how piracy impacts sales of media products. Within these literatures, we have chosen to focus on empirical studies of the impact of piracy because, while there are a variety of analytic models proposing theories of how piracy might impact sales, we believe that the true test of these theories starts with data.
Based on our review of the empirical literature we conclude that, while some papers in the literature find no evidence of harm, the vast majority of the literature (particularly the literature published in top peer reviewed journals) finds evidence that piracy harms media sales.
Main Results of the Study
To summarize, while the academic literature is not uniform in finding harm, taken as a whole we see a very consistent story across the academic literature: With one exception, all of the papers we are aware of which have been published in major peer-reviewed academic journals find evidence of statistically significant harm to sales of recently released content as a result of illegal file sharing. These papers span a variety of methods, time periods, and contexts. Moreover, while the one dissenting paper should be lauded for innovative methods of data collection, and for being among the very first papers published addressing this question, there have been significant questions raised about the appropriateness of its instrumental variable, and as such we believe it is appropriate to weigh its finding that piracy does not harm sales relative to the large number of papers with opposite findings.
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
Based on our review of the empirical literature we conclude that, while some papers in the literature find no evidence of harm, the vast majority of the literature (particularly the literature published in top peer reviewed journals) finds evidence that piracy harms media sales.