Case Study
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Case Study is a qualitative method defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki. The following studies use this method for data collection (100):
Citation | |
---|---|
Aguiar and Waldfogel (2014) | Aguiar, Luis, and Joel Waldfogel. Digitization, Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade. Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade (December 3, 2014) (2014). |
Aguilar (2019) | Aguilar, A. (2019) We want Artists to be Fully and Fairly Paid for their Work’: Discourses on Fairness in the Neoliberal European Copyright Reform. JIPITEC 9 (2) |
Aguilar (2019a) | Aguilar, A. (2019) The collective management of performers’ rights in the UK: a story of competing interests. Scripted 16(1) DOI: 10.2966/scrip.160119.4 |
Ahn and Yooney (2008) | Ahn, Illtae, and Kiho Yoon. On the impact of digital music distribution. CESifo Economic Studies 55.2 (2009): 306-325. |
Altschuller and Benbunan-Fich (2009) | Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2009). Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 49-56. |
Asser Institute and IViR (2014) | T.M.C. Asser Instituut/Asser International Sports Law Centre and the Institute for Information Law - University of Amsterdam (2014) Study on Sports Organisers' Rights in the European Union, EAC/18/2012 |
BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015) | BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. |
Bae and Choi (2006) | Bae, Sang Hoo, and Jay Pil Choi. A model of piracy. Information Economics and Policy 18.3 (2006): 303-320. |
Banerjee, Banerjee and Raychaudhuri (2008) | Banerjee, Dyuti S., and Ajitava Raychaudhuri. OPTIMAL ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI‐COPYING STRATEGIES TO COUNTER COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Japanese Economic Review 59.4 (2008): 519-535. |
Banks and Humphreys (2008) | Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The Labour of User Co-Creators Emergent Social Network Markets?. Convergence: the International Journal of research into New Media technologies, 14(4), 401-418. |
Barker (2012b) | Barker, George Robert, 'Estimating the Economic Effects of Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: A Critique of Recent Research in Australia, US, Europe and Singapore' (November 26, 2012). |
Belleflamme (2002) | Belleflamme, Paul. Pricing information goods in the presence of copying. U of London Queen Mary Economics Working Paper 463 (2002). |
Belleflamme and Peitz (2014) | Belleflammea, Paul, and Martin Peitzb. Digital piracy. (2014). |
Benkler (1999) | Benkler, Y. (1999). Free as the air to common use: First amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain. NyuL Rev., 74, 354. |
Bjork (2012) | Björk, B.C., The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles–a Failed Experiment?. |
Bockstedt, Kauffman and Riggins (2004) | Bockstedt, J., Kauffman, R. J., & Riggins, F. J. (2004). The move to artist-led online music distribution: Explaining structural changes in the digital music market. Paper accepted at the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. |
Brassell and Goodyer (2015) | Brassell, M. & Goodyer, I. (2015) Penalty Fair? Study of criminal sanctions for copyright infringement available under the CDPA 1988. IPO, 2015 |
Brooks (2005) | Brooks, T. (2005). Survey of reissues of US recordings. Council on Library and Information Resources. |
Bryce and Rutter (2005) | Bryce, J., & Rutter, J. (2005). Fake Nation? A study into an everyday crime. The Intellectual Property Theft and Organised Crime research project, UK. |
Cameron and Bazelon (2013) | Cameron, L., & Bazelon, C. (2013). The impact of digitization on business models in copyright driven industries: a review of economic issues. Brattle Groupe paper prepared for the US National Research Council, available at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_063398.pdf. |
Carpou (2016) | Carpou, Z. (2016) Robots, Pirates and the Rise of the Automated Takedown Regime: Using the DMCA to Fight Piracy and Protect End-Users. 39 Colum J.L. & Arts 551. |
Cave, Deegan and Heinink (2000) | Cave, M., Deegan, M. and Heinink, L., 2000. Copyright clearance in the refugee studies centre digital library project. RLG DigiNews, 4(5). |
Chen and Png (2003) | Chen, Yeh-ning, and Ivan Png. Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Information Systems Research 14.1 (2003): 107-123. |
Cooper and Burrow (2018) | Cooper, E. and Burrow, S. (2018) Photographic Copyright and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Historical Perspective. CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1246559. |
Danbury (2016) | Danbury, R. (2016). Is an EU publishers’ right a good idea? Final report on the AHRC project: Evaluating potential legal responses to threats to the production of news in a digital era, https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/sites/www.law.cam.ac.uk/files/images/www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/documents/copyright_and_news/danbury_publishers_right_report.pdf |
Deazley (2008) | Deazley, R. (2008) ‘Commentary on Milton's Contract 1667', in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org |
Depoorter and Vanneste (2006) | Depoorter, B. and Vanneste, S., 2006. Norms and enforcement: The case against copyright litigation. Oregon Law Review, 84(4), p.1127. |
Dickson (2010) | Dickson, M., 2010. Due diligence, futile effort: Copyright and the digitization of the Thomas E. Watson papers. The American Archivist, 73(2), pp.626-636. |
Dootson and Suzor (2015) | Dootson, P. and Suzor, N. (2015) The Game of Clones and the Australia Tax: Divergent Views about Copyright Business Models and the Willingness of Australian Consumers to Infringe. University of New South Wales Law Journal 38. |
Dryden (2008) | Dryden, J.E., 2008. Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto). |
Edwards, Klein, Lee, Moss and Philip (2015) | Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G., & Philip, F. (2015). Discourse, justification and critique: towards a legitimate digital copyright regime?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(1), 60-77. |
Fagundes and Perzanowski (2019) | Fagundes, D. And Perzanowski, A. (2019) Clown Eggs. Notre Dame Law Review, 94(3). |
Favale (2011) | Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323 |
Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013) | Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498. |
Fromer and Lemley (2013) | Fromer, Jeanne C., and Mark A. Lemley. "Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement, The." Mich. L. Rev. 112 (2013): 1251. |
Frosio (2014) | Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014). |
Fuller and Abdenour (2018) | Fuller, P.B and Abdenour, J (2018) It’s Bigger Than Hip-Hop: Sampling and the Emergence of the Market Enhancement Model in Fair Use Case Law. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1 - 25. |
Gasser (2004) | Gasser, U. (2004) iTunes: How Copyright, Contract, and Technology Shape the Business of Digital Media – a Case Study. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publication No. 2004-07 |
Geradin (2005) | Geradin, Damien. Access to content by new media platforms: a review of the competition law problems. European Law Review, February (2005). |
Gerhardt (2011) | Gerhardt, D. R. (2011). Copyright publication: an empirical study. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1). |
Gerhardt (2014) | Gerhardt, D. R. (2014). Copyright at the Museum: Using the Publication Doctrine to Free Art and History. Available at SSRN 2505041. |
Ghose, Smith and Telang (2006) | Ghose, A., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R., 2006. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Information Systems Research, 17(1), pp.3-19. |
Giorcelli and Moser (2015) | Giorcelli, M., & Moser, P. (2014). Copyright and Creativity: Evidence from Italian Operas. Available at SSRN 2505776. |
Gordon (1982) | Gordon, W. J. (1982). Fair use as market failure: a structural and economic analysis of the" Betamax" case and its predecessors. Columbia Law Review, 82(8), 1600-1657. |
Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010) | Greenhalgh, C., Philips, J., Pitkethly, R., Rogers, M., & Tomalin, J. (2010). Intellectual Property Enforcement in Smaller UK Firms. Report for the Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP). |
Grøndal (2006) | Grøndal, L. (2006) DRM and contract terms. Available at https://www.itas.kit.edu/downloads/projekt/projekt_orwa04_indicare_174.pdf (last accessed 12/03/2023) |
Guadamuz and Cabell (2014) | Guadamuz, A. and Cabell, D. (2014) Data Mining in UK Higher Education Institutions: Law and Policy. Queen Mary Intellectual Property Review 4:1 pp. 3-29 |
Haefliger, Jäger and Von Krogh (2010) | Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research policy, 39(9), 1198-1213. |
Handke and Towse (2007) | Handke, Christian, and Ruth Towse. Economics of copyright collecting societies. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 38.8 (2007): 937-957. |
Hansen, Hashimoto, Hinze, Samuelson and Urban (2013) | Hansen, D. R., Hashimoto, K., Hinze, G., Samuelson, P., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Solving the orphan works problem for the united states. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 37(1). |
... further results |