Creative, arts and entertainment
From Copyright EVIDENCE
This industry category includes the following:
90.0 Creative, arts and entertainment activities
- This group includes activities in the creative and performing arts and related activities.
- 90.01 Performing arts
- This class includes:
- - live theatrical presentations, concerts and opera or dance productions and other stage productions:
- activities of groups, circuses or companies, orchestras or bands
- activities of individual artists such as actors, dancers, musicians, lecturers or speakers
- 90.02 Support activities to performing arts
- This class includes:
- - support activities to performing arts for production of live theatrical presentations, concerts and opera or dance productions and other stage productions:
- activities of directors, producers, stage-set designers and builders, scene shifters, lighting engineers etc.
- This class also includes:
- - activities of producers or entrepreneurs of arts live events, with or without facilities
- 90.03 Artistic creation
- This class includes:
- - activities of individual artists such as sculptors, painters, cartoonists, engravers, etchers etc.
- - activities of individual writers, for all subjects including fictional writing, technical writing etc.
- - activities of independent journalists
- - restoring of works of art such as paintings etc.
- 90.04 Operation of arts facilities
- This class includes:
- - operation of concert and theatre halls and other arts facilities
Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix
| Industry Sectors | |
|
Creative, arts and entertainment is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.
The following studies involve this industry sector (177):
| Citation | |
|---|---|
| Allen (2012) | Allen, N. (2012) Art Museum Images in Scholarly Publishing. Texas: Connexions. |
| Arai and Kinukawa (2014) | Arai, Y. and Kinukawa, S., 2014. Copyright infringement as user innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), pp.131-144. |
| Asongu (2014) | Simplice Asongu, (2014) "Software piracy, inequality and the poor: evidence from Africa", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 41 Issue: 4, pp.526-553, available under: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2012-0141. |
| Aufderheide et al. (2018) | Aufderheide, P., Pappalardo, K., Suzor, N. And Stevens, J. (2018) Calculating the consequences of narrow Australian copyright exceptions: Measurable, hidden and incalculable costs to creators. Poetics, 69, pp15-26. |
| Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) | ALRC Report 122 (2013), available at http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/final_report_alrc_122_2nd_december_2013_.pdf. |
| BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015) | BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. |
| Balganesh, Manta and Wilkinson-Ryan (2014) | Balganesh, S., Manta, I., & Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2014). Judging similarity. 100 Iowa Law Review 267; University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-15; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-09. Available at SSRN 2409811. |
| Ballon and Westermann (2006) | Ballon, H. and Westermann, M. (2006) Art History and Its Publications in the Electronic Age. Texas: Connexions. |
| Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016) | Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming. |
| Beebe (2008) | Beebe, B. (2008). An empirical study of US copyright fair use opinions, 1978-2005. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 549-624. |
| Belleflamme, Omrani and Peitz (2015) | Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N. and Peitz, M., 2015. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, pp.11-28. |
| Bently (2002) | Bently, L. (2002). Between a rock and a hard place: The problems facing freelance creators in the UK media market–place. London: Institute of Employment Rights. ii. Canada. |
| Bmrb Social Research (2009) | BMRB Social Research. (2009). Future copyright development. Intellectual Property Office, UK. |
| Brassell and Goodyer (2015) | Brassell, M. & Goodyer, I. (2015) Penalty Fair? Study of criminal sanctions for copyright infringement available under the CDPA 1988. IPO, 2015 |
| Brauneis and Oliar (2016) | Brauneis, R. and Olliar, D. (2016) Copyright’s Race, Gender and Age: A First Quantitative Look at Registrations. GWU Law School Public Law Research paper No. 2016-48 |
| Breyer (1970) | Breyer, S., 1970. The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, pp.281-351. |
| Buccafusco (2012) | Buccafusco, C. J. (2012). Making Sense of Intellectual Property Law. Cornell Law Review, 97, 501. |
| Buccafusco and Masur (2013) | Buccafusco, Christopher, and Jonathan S. Masur. Innovation and Incarceration: An Economic Analysis of Criminal Intellectual Property Law. S. Cal. L. Rev. 87 (2013): 275. |
| Buccafusco and Sprigman (2010) | Buccafusco, C. J., & Sprigman, C. J. (2010). Valuing Intellectual Property: An Experiment. Cornell Law Review. |
| Buccafusco, Burns, Fromer and Sprigman (2014) | Buccafusco, C. J., Burns, Z. C., Fromer, J. C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2014). Experimental Tests of Intellectual Property Laws’ Creativity Thresholds. Texas Law Review, 93, 1921. |
| Cantatore (2014) | Cantatore, F. (2014). From vault to honesty box: Australian authors and the changing face of copyright. Bond Law Review, 25(1), 5. |
| Castañer and Campos (2002) | Castañer, X. and Campos, L., 2002. The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(1), pp.29-52. |
| Charness and Daniela (2014) | Charness, G., & Grieco, D. (2014). Creativity and Financial Incentives. |
| Cheliotis (2007) | Cheliotis, G. (2007). Remix culture: an empirical analysis of creative reuse and the licensing of digital media in online communities. |
| Chen and Png (2003) | Chen, Yeh-ning, and Ivan Png. Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Information Systems Research 14.1 (2003): 107-123. |
| Chen and Puttitanun (2005) | Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474-493. |
| Collections Trust (2015) | Collections Trust (2015) Striking the Balance: How NMDC members are balancing public access and commercial reuse of digital content. A report by the Collections Trust commissioned by the NMDC <https://www.nationalmuseums.org.uk/media/documents/publications/striking_the_balance.pdf> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014) | Collopy, D., Bastian, V., Drye, T., Koempel, F., Lewis, D., & Jenner, P. (2014). Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights. |
| Cotropia and Gibson (2014) | Cotropia, C. A., & Gibson, J. (2014). Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation. Texas Law Review, 92(7). |
| Cuntz (2018) | Cuntz, A. (, 2018). Creator’s Income Situation in the Digital Age. LIS Working Papers 755, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg. |
| Cuntz (2020) | Cuntz, A. (2020) Grand rights and opera reuse today. WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No.62 |
| Danna, Martinelli and Nuvolari (2021) | Danna, R.; Martinelli, A. and Nuvolari, A. (2021) D4.6. Interim report on negative space of EU creative industries <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5069616> (Zenodo 5 July 2021) last accessed 7 December 2021 |
| De Beer and Bouchard (2010) | De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's' Orphan Works' Regime: Unlocatable Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215. |
| De Wolf and Partners (2013) | Triaille, J.P., Dusollier, S., Depreeuw, S., Hubin, J.B. and De Francquen, A., 2013. Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society. InfoSoc Directive. |
| Deazley (2008) | Deazley, R. (2008) ‘Commentary on Milton's Contract 1667', in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org |
| Denoyelle et al (2018) | Denoyelle, M., Durand, K., Daniel, J. and Doulkaridou-Ramantani, E. (2018) Image rights, art history and society. Report presented to the Foundation de France <https://www.inha.fr/fr/recherche/le-departement-des-etudes-et-de-la-recherche/domaines-de-recherche/programmes-en-cours/images-usages.html> (accessed 7 January 2022) |
| Depoorter (2019) | Depoorter, B. (2019) Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: When the Remedy is the Wrong. 66 UCLA L. Rev. 400 |
| Depoorter and Walker (2013) | Depoorter, B. and Walker, R.K., 2013. Copyright false positives. |
| Dusollier (2010) | Dusollier, S., WIPO (2010) CDIP/4/3/REV./STUDY/INF/1. |
| EPO and OHIM (2013) | EPO and OHIM (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union. |
| Erickson (2018) | Erickson, K. (2018) Can creative firms thrive without copyright? Value generation and capture from private-collection innovation. Business Horizons, 61:5, pp699-709 |
| Erickson and Kretschmer (2019) | Erickson, K. And Kretschmer, M. (2019) Empirical Approaches to Intermediary Liability in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY ONLINE (ed. Giancarlo Frosio), Oxford University Press, Forthcoming |
| Erickson, Heald, Homberg, Kretschmer and Mendis (2015) | Erickson, K., Heald, P. J., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain: An Empirical Assessment. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper. |
| Erickson, Kretschmer and Mendis (2013) | Erickson, K., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2013). Copyright and the Economic Effects of Parody: An Empirical Study of Music Videos on the YouTube Platform and an Assessment of the Regulatory Options. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, (2013/24). |
| Erickson, Kretschmer and Mendis (2019) | Erickson, K., Kretschmer, M. and Mendis, D. (2019) “An Empirical Approach to the Public Domain” in Drexl, J. and Kamperman, J. Sanders (Eds.) The Innovation Society and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar |
| Erickson, Rodriguez Perez and Rodriguez Perez (2018) | Erickson, K, Rodriguez Perez, F and Rodriguez Perez, J (2018) What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. OpenSym ’18: The 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 22-24 Aug 2018, Paris, France. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). ISBN 978-1-4503-59 36-8 |
| European Commission (2011a) | Report on the Implementation and Effect of the Resale Right Directive (2001/84/EC), European Commission (2011), available at |
| European Commission (2011b) | European Commission Impact assessment on the cross-border online access to orphan works (Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2011) 615 (final) |
| Fagundes and Perzanowski (2019) | Fagundes, D. And Perzanowski, A. (2019) Clown Eggs. Notre Dame Law Review, 94(3). |
| Farooqui, Goodridge and Haskel (2011) | Farooqui, S., Goodridge, P., & Haskel, J. (2011). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the UK Market Sector. Intellectual Property, 2. |
| ... further results | |
