European Union

From Copyright EVIDENCE
Countries
... further results

European Union is a country defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.

The following studies include coverage of this country (94):

 Citation
Aguiar and Waldfogel (2014)Aguiar, Luis, and Joel Waldfogel. Digitization, Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade. Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade (December 3, 2014) (2014).
Aguilar (2019)Aguilar, A. (2019) We want Artists to be Fully and Fairly Paid for their Work’: Discourses on Fairness in the Neoliberal European Copyright Reform. JIPITEC 9 (2)
Angelopoulos (2012)Angelopoulos, C. (2012). The myth of European term harmonisation: 27 public domains for the 27 member states. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2012) Vol, 43, 567-594.
Asser Institute and IViR (2014)T.M.C. Asser Instituut/Asser International Sports Law Centre and the Institute for Information Law - University of Amsterdam (2014) Study on Sports Organisers' Rights in the European Union, EAC/18/2012
Barker (2012b)Barker, George Robert, 'Estimating the Economic Effects of Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: A Critique of Recent Research in Australia, US, Europe and Singapore' (November 26, 2012).
Batikas, Claussen and Peukert (2019)Batikas, M., Claussen, J., & Peukert, C. (2019). Follow the money: Online piracy and self-regulation in the advertising industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 65, 121-151.
Bechtold (2013)Bechtold, S., 2013. The fashion of TV show formats.
Belleflamme and Peitz (2014)Belleflammea, Paul, and Martin Peitzb. Digital piracy. (2014).
Bently et al. (2017)Bently, L., Kretschmer, M., Dudenbostel, T., Moreno, M. and Radauer, A. (2017) Strengthening the Position of Press Publishers and Authors and Performers in the Copyright Directive. Project Report. European Parliament, Brussels.
Buss and Peukert (2015)Buss, P., & Peukert, C. (2015). R&D outsourcing and intellectual property infringement. Research Policy, 44(4), 977-989.
Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2016)Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2016), Response to Article 11 of the Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, entitled ‘Protection of press publications concerning digital uses’ on behalf of thirty seven professors and leading scholars of Intellectual Property, Information Law and Digital Economy
Charles River Associates (2013)Assessing the Economic Impacts of Adapting Certain Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights in the EU, Charles River Assoc., (2013), available at
Charles River Associates (2014)Charles River Associates, Economic Analysis of the Territoriality of the Making Available Right in the EU (2014).
Commission of the European Communities (2005a)DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005)
Commission of the European Communities (2005b)Study on a Community Initiative on the Cross-border Collective Management of Copyright, Commission of the European Communities (2005), available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/management/study-collectivemgmt_en.pdf.
Corporate Europe Observatory (2018)Corporate Europe Observatory (2018) Copyright Directive: how competing big business lobbies drowned out critical voices. Available via: https://corporateeurope.org/en/2018/12/copyright-directive-how-competing-big-business-lobbies-drowned-out-critical-voices (last accessed: 7 June 2019)
Danahar, Smith and Teland (2015)Danaher, B., Smith, M., Teland, R.,'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence and Conclusions', WIPO/ACE/10/20, 2015
Danbury (2016)Danbury, R. (2016). Is an EU publishers’ right a good idea? Final report on the AHRC project: Evaluating potential legal responses to threats to the production of news in a digital era, https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/sites/www.law.cam.ac.uk/files/images/www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/documents/copyright_and_news/danbury_publishers_right_report.pdf
De Wolf and Partners (2014a)De Wolf & Partners, Study on the Legal Framework of Text and Data Mining (TDM) (2014).
De Wolf and Partners (2014b)Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-border Digital Transmissions, De Wolf & Partners (2014).
EIFL (2013)Electronic Information For Libraries - The European Orphan Works Directive An EIFL Guide (2013)
EPO and OHIM (2013)EPO and OHIM (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union.
EUIPO (2017)
EY (2014)EY (2014) Creating Growth: Measuring Cultural and Creative Markets in the EU,
Elkin-Koren, Nahmias and Perel (2019)Elkin-Koren, N., Nahmias, Y. And Perel, M. (2019) Is It Time to Abolish Safe Harbor? When Rhetoric Clouds Policy Goals. Stanford Law & Policy Review, Forthcoming
Erickson (2014)Erickson, K. (2014) User Illusion: Ideological Construction of ‘User- Generated Content’ in the EC Consultation on Copyright. Internet Policy Review 4(3). DOI:10.14763/2014.4.331
Erickson and Kretschmer (2019)Erickson, K. And Kretschmer, M. (2019) Empirical Approaches to Intermediary Liability in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY ONLINE (ed. Giancarlo Frosio), Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
European Commission (2011a)Report on the Implementation and Effect of the Resale Right Directive (2001/84/EC), European Commission (2011), available at
European Commission (2011b)European Commission Impact assessment on the cross-border online access to orphan works (Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2011) 615 (final)
European Commission (2013)European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures
European Commission (2014)Guidelines on Recommended Standard Licences, Datasets and Charging for the Reuse of Documents, European Commission 2014/C 240/01, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=6421.
European Commission (2016)European Commission (2016) Synopsis Report on the Public Consultation on the Regulatory Environment for Platforms, Online Intermediaries and the Collaborative Economy,
European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010)European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010). Damages in Intellectual Property Rights.
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs (2015)European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs.
European Patent Office and Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (2013)Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries: Contribution to Economic Performance and Employment in the European Union, The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office (2013) available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/intellectual-property/docs/joint-report-epo-ohim-final-version_en.pdf.
European Union Intellectual Property Office (2016)European Union Intellectual Property Office (2016). Intellectual Property and Youth.
Favale (2011)Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323
Favale (2020)Favale, M. (2021). "The Role of the Court of Justice in the Development of EU Copyright Law: an Empirical Experience". In EU Copyright Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437808.00039
Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013)Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498.
Favale, Kretschmer and Torremans (2018)Favale, M., Kretschmer, M., and Torremans, P.L.C. (2018) Who Is Steering the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice? The Influence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3116703 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116703
Frosio (2014)Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014).
Frosio (2017)Frosio, G. F. (2017). Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy.
Gasser (2004)Gasser, U. (2004) iTunes: How Copyright, Contract, and Technology Shape the Business of Digital Media – a Case Study. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publication No. 2004-07
Geradin (2005)Geradin, Damien. Access to content by new media platforms: a review of the competition law problems. European Law Review, February (2005).
GfK Belgium (2015)GfK Belgium, Provision of two online consumer surveys as support and evidence base to a Commission study: Identifying the main cross-border obstacles to the Digital Single Market and where they matter most
Ginarte and Park (1997)Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research policy, 26(3), 283-301.
Gomez and Martens (2015)Gómez, Estrella and Martens, Bertin, Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital Single Market for Music and Film (May 6, 2015). JRC/IPTS Digital Economy working paper 2015-04.
Grøndal (2006)Grøndal, L. (2006) DRM and contract terms. Available at https://www.itas.kit.edu/downloads/projekt/projekt_orwa04_indicare_174.pdf (last accessed 12/03/2023)
Guibault and Salamanca (2016)Guibault, L. And Salamanca, O. (2016) Remuneration of authors of books and scientific journals, translators, journalists and visual artists for the use of their works. A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, Final Report. IViR.
Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)Guibault et al., Study on the Implementation and Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (2007)
... further results