Photographic activities
From Copyright EVIDENCE
This industry category includes the following:
- 74.2 Photographic activities
- 74.20 Photographic activities
- 74.20/1 Portrait photographic activities
- This subclass includes:
- portrait photography for passports, schools, weddings etc.
- 74.20/2 Other specialist photography (not including portrait photography)
- This subclass includes:
- - aerial photography
- - photographing of persons, objects or scenery using special apparatus and techniques e.g.
- underwater photography
- medical and biological photography
- photomicrography
- microfilming of documents
- 74.20/3 Film processing
- This subclass includes:
- - developing, printing and enlarging from client-taken negatives or cine-films
- - film developing and photo printing laboratories
- - one hour photo shops (not part of camera stores)
- - mounting of slides
- - copying and restoring or transparency retouching in connection with photographs
- 74.20/9 Other photographic activities (not including portrait and other specialist photography and film processing) n.e.c.
- This subclass includes:
- - photography for commercials, publishers, fashion, real estate or tourism purposes
- - videotaping of events: weddings, meetings etc.
- - activities of photojournalists
- 74.20 Photographic activities
Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix
| Industry Sectors | |
|
Photographic activities is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.
The following studies involve this industry sector (53):
| Citation | |
|---|---|
| Allen (2012) | Allen, N. (2012) Art Museum Images in Scholarly Publishing. Texas: Connexions. |
| Angelopoulos (2012) | Angelopoulos, C. (2012). The myth of European term harmonisation: 27 public domains for the 27 member states. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2012) Vol, 43, 567-594. |
| Astle and Muir (2002) | Astle, P.J. and Muir, A., 2002. Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34(2), pp.67-79. |
| Attorney-General's Department (2008) | Attorney-General's Department (Australia), 2008, Review of copyright exceptions for private copying of photographs and films - final report, Attorney-General's Department (Australia) |
| BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015) | BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. |
| Ballon and Westermann (2006) | Ballon, H. and Westermann, M. (2006) Art History and Its Publications in the Electronic Age. Texas: Connexions. |
| Bar-Ziv and Elkin-Koren (2018) | Bar-Ziv, S. and Elkin-Koren, N. (2018) Behind the Scenes of Online Copyright Enforcement: Empirical Evidence on Notice & Takedown. Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 50(2). |
| Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016) | Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming. |
| Canat, Guibault and Logeais (2015) | Canat, J., Guibault, L. and Logeais, E., Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) SCCR/30/2. |
| Collections Trust (2015) | Collections Trust (2015) Striking the Balance: How NMDC members are balancing public access and commercial reuse of digital content. A report by the Collections Trust commissioned by the NMDC <https://www.nationalmuseums.org.uk/media/documents/publications/striking_the_balance.pdf> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| Cooper and Burrow (2018) | Cooper, E. and Burrow, S. (2018) Photographic Copyright and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Historical Perspective. CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1246559. |
| Corbett (2011) | Corbett, S., 2011. Archiving Our Culture in a Digital Environment: Copyright Law and Digitisation Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions. New Zealand Law Foundation Report. |
| Cotropia and Gibson (2014) | Cotropia, C. A., & Gibson, J. (2014). Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation. Texas Law Review, 92(7). |
| Denoyelle et al (2018) | Denoyelle, M., Durand, K., Daniel, J. and Doulkaridou-Ramantani, E. (2018) Image rights, art history and society. Report presented to the Foundation de France <https://www.inha.fr/fr/recherche/le-departement-des-etudes-et-de-la-recherche/domaines-de-recherche/programmes-en-cours/images-usages.html> (accessed 7 January 2022) |
| Dryden (2008) | Dryden, J.E., 2008. Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto). |
| Dulong de Rosnay and Langlais (2017) | Dulong de Rosnay, M. and Langlais, P. (2017) Public artworks and the freedom of panorama controversy: a case of Wikimedia influence. Internet Policy Review Vol. 6(1) |
| Dusollier (2010) | Dusollier, S., WIPO (2010) CDIP/4/3/REV./STUDY/INF/1. |
| Engstrom and Feamster (2017) | Engstrom, E. And Feamster, N. (2017) The Limits of Filtering: A Look at the Functionality & Shortcomings of Content Detection Tools. Available: https://www.engine.is/the-limits-of-filtering (last accessed 23 May 2019) |
| Envisional (2011) | Envisional (2011), Technical report: An Estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet |
| Erickson, Rodriguez Perez and Rodriguez Perez (2018) | Erickson, K, Rodriguez Perez, F and Rodriguez Perez, J (2018) What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. OpenSym ’18: The 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 22-24 Aug 2018, Paris, France. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). ISBN 978-1-4503-59 36-8 |
| Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013) | Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498. |
| Gecer and Topal (2019) | Gecer, A.K. and Topal, A.D. (2019) Academic and postgraduate student awareness of digital product copyright issues. Information Development. |
| Gowers (2006) | Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office. |
| Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010) | Greenhalgh, C., Philips, J., Pitkethly, R., Rogers, M., & Tomalin, J. (2010). Intellectual Property Enforcement in Smaller UK Firms. Report for the Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP). |
| Hadopi (2011) | HADOPI. 2011. Hadopi, cultural assets and internet use: practices and perceptions of French internet users (Online). Available: http://www.hadopi.fr/download/HADOPI_T0_version_long.pdf. |
| Hansen, Hashimoto, Hinze, Samuelson and Urban (2013) | Hansen, D. R., Hashimoto, K., Hinze, G., Samuelson, P., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Solving the orphan works problem for the united states. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 37(1). |
| Hargreaves (2011) | Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity. A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, |
| Heald, Erickson and Kretschmer (2015) | Heald, P. J., Kretschmer, M., & Erickson, K. (2015). The Valuation of Unprotected Works: A Case Study of Public Domain Photographs on Wikipedia. Available at SSRN. |
| Hooper and Lynch (2012a) | Hooper, R., & Lynch, R. (2012). Rights and wrongs: Is copyright licensing fit for purpose for the digital age? The first report of the Digital Copyright Exchange feasibility study, IPO. |
| Hooper and Lynch (2012b) | Hooper, R., & Lynch, R. (2012). Copyright works: Streamlining copyright licensing for the digital age. Intellectual Property Office: Newport. |
| Hudson and Kenyon (2007) | Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A.T., 2007. Digital Access: The Impact of Copyright on Digitisation Practices in Australian Museums, Galleries, Libraries, and Archives. UNSWLJ, 30, p.12. |
| Kelly (2013) | Kelly, K. (2013) Images of Works of Art in Museum Collections: The Experience of Open Access. Mellon Foundation Study <https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub157/> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| Kelly (2019) | Kelly, E.J. (2019) Digital Cultural Heritage and Wikimedia Commons Licenses: Copyright or Copywrong? Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship, 3(3) |
| Landes and Posner (2003a) | Landes, W. and Posner, R.A. (2003) Indefinitely Renewable Copyright. 70 University of Chicago Law School Review 471 |
| Liu (2019) | Liu, J. (2019) An Empirical Study of Transformative Use in Copyright Law. Stan. Tech. L.Rev. 22(1) pp. 164 - 241 |
| Luo and Mortimer (2018) | Luo, H. And Mortimer, J.H. (2019) Infringing Use as a Path to Legal Consumption: Evidence from a Field Experiment . NBER Working paper No. 25453. |
| Marshall and Shipman (2019) | Marshall, C.C. & Shipman, F.M. (2019) The Ownership and Control of Online Photos and Game Data: Patterns, Trends, and Keeping Pace with Evolving Circumstances. 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries |
| Marsoof and Gupta (2019) | Marsoof, A.and Gupta, I. (2019) Shielding internet intermediaries from copyright liability — A comparative discourse on safe harbours in Singapore and India. J World Intellectual Prop. 22, 234 - 270 |
| Patton (2019) | Patton, M. (2019). How to Protect Users' Copyright Rights in the Age of Social Media Platforms and Their Unread Terms of Service. USFL Rev., 53, 463. |
| Rogers (2013) | Rogers, E. (2013) Substantially Unfair: An Empirical Examination of Copyright Substantial Similarity Analysis among the Federal Circuits. Mich. St. L. Rev. 893 |
| Shmatkov (2020) | Shmatkov, D. (2020) Does copyright only serve the creative industries? International Conference on Business Management, Innovation and Sustainability. |
| Silbey (2014a) | Silbey, J. (2014) The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford University Press: Stanford. |
| Silbey (2014b) | Sibley, J. (2014) Promoting Progress: A Qualitative Analysis of Creative and Innovative Production, in The SAGE Handbook of Intellectual Property (SAGE Publications, 2014), p. 515 |
| Silbey (2019a) | Silbey, J. (2019) Control over Contemporary Photography: A Tangle of Copyright, Right of Publicity, and the First Amendment. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 42(3), pp. 351-364 |
| Silbey (2019b) | Silbey, J. (2019) Justifying Copyright in the Age of Digital Reproduction: The Case of Photographers. UC Irvine Law Review, 9, pp. 405-454 |
| Silbey, Subotnik and DiCola (2019) | Sibley, J., Subotnik, E.E. and Dicola, P. (2019) Existential Copyright and Professional Photography. Notre Dame Law Review 95(1) |
| Sinnreich et al. (2020) | Sinnreich, A., Aufderheide, P., Clifford, M. and Shahin, S. (2020) Access shrugged: The decline of the copyleft and the rise of utilitarian openness. New Media & Society. |
| Tanner (2004) | Tanner, S. (2004) Reproduction charging models & rights policy for digital images in American art museums. Mellon Foundation Study. <http://msc.mellon.org/msc-files/Reproduction%20charging%20models%20and%20rights%20policy.pdf> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| United States Copyright Office (2015b) | Orphan Works and Mass Digitization, United States Copyright Office (2015), available at http://copyright.gov/orphan/reports/orphan-works2015.pdf. |
| Urban, Karaganis and Schofield (2016) | Urban, J, Karaganis, J. and Schofield, B. (2016) Notice and Takedown in Everyday Practice (March 29, 2016). UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2755628. |
| ... further results | |
