Photographic activities
From Copyright EVIDENCE
This industry category includes the following:
- 74.2 Photographic activities
- 74.20 Photographic activities
- 74.20/1 Portrait photographic activities
- This subclass includes:
- portrait photography for passports, schools, weddings etc.
- 74.20/2 Other specialist photography (not including portrait photography)
- This subclass includes:
- - aerial photography
- - photographing of persons, objects or scenery using special apparatus and techniques e.g.
- underwater photography
- medical and biological photography
- photomicrography
- microfilming of documents
- 74.20/3 Film processing
- This subclass includes:
- - developing, printing and enlarging from client-taken negatives or cine-films
- - film developing and photo printing laboratories
- - one hour photo shops (not part of camera stores)
- - mounting of slides
- - copying and restoring or transparency retouching in connection with photographs
- 74.20/9 Other photographic activities (not including portrait and other specialist photography and film processing) n.e.c.
- This subclass includes:
- - photography for commercials, publishers, fashion, real estate or tourism purposes
- - videotaping of events: weddings, meetings etc.
- - activities of photojournalists
- 74.20 Photographic activities
Click Here for more details on this classification: Industry Appendix
| Industry Sectors | |
|
Photographic activities is an industry sector defined within the Copyright Evidence wiki.
The following studies involve this industry sector (71):
| Citation | |
|---|---|
| Allen (2012) | Allen, N. (2012) Art Museum Images in Scholarly Publishing. Texas: Connexions. |
| Astle and Muir (2002) | Astle, P.J. and Muir, A., 2002. Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34(2), pp.67-79. |
| Attorney-General's Department (2008) | Attorney-General's Department (Australia), 2008, Review of copyright exceptions for private copying of photographs and films - final report, Attorney-General's Department (Australia) |
| BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015) | BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. |
| Bair (2020) | Bair, S.P. (2020) Impoverished IP, Ohio St. L. J. 523 BYU Law Research Paper No. 19-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3365290. |
| Ballon and Westermann (2006) | Ballon, H. and Westermann, M. (2006) Art History and Its Publications in the Electronic Age. Texas: Connexions. |
| Banks and Li (2025) | Banks, J. & Li, J. (2025) Wherefore Art Thou: Mapping Public Debates about Image-Generative AI Proceedings of the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 556-575, https://hdl.handle.net/10125/108904 |
| Bar-Ziv and Elkin-Koren (2018) | Bar-Ziv, S. and Elkin-Koren, N. (2018) Behind the Scenes of Online Copyright Enforcement: Empirical Evidence on Notice & Takedown. Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 50(2). |
| Bechtold, Buccafusco and Sprigman (2016) | Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming. |
| Blockx (2020) | Blockx, F (2020) Reading Tea Leaves Differently? A Comparison of the Interpretive Finger-Print of the European Court of Justice and the US Supreme Court in Copyright Law in Eleonora Rosati (ed), Handbook of EU Copyright Law (Routledge 2021). |
| Burgmer, Forstmann and Stavrova (2018) | Burgmer, P., Forstmann, M. & Stavrova, O. (2018) Ideas are cheaar: When and why adults value labor over ideas, Journal of Experimental Psychology, doi:10.1037/xge0000473. |
| Canat, Guibault and Logeais (2015) | Canat, J., Guibault, L. and Logeais, E., Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) SCCR/30/2. |
| Chelberg (2021) | Chelberg, K (2021) ‘Sharing is Caring’: Copyright Metaphors and Online Sharing Norms Law Technology and Humans 3 (2):61-75 https://doi.org/10.5204/thj.1271. |
| Chepurna and Criado (2021) | Chepurna, M. & Criado, J. R. (2021) What motivates and deters users’ online co-creation? The role of cultural and socio-demographic factors, Emerald Insight, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SJME-10-2020-0176. |
| Collections Trust (2015) | Collections Trust (2015) Striking the Balance: How NMDC members are balancing public access and commercial reuse of digital content. A report by the Collections Trust commissioned by the NMDC <https://www.nationalmuseums.org.uk/media/documents/publications/striking_the_balance.pdf> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| Cooper and Burrow (2018) | Cooper, E. and Burrow, S. (2018) Photographic Copyright and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Historical Perspective. CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1246559. |
| Corbett (2011) | Corbett, S., 2011. Archiving Our Culture in a Digital Environment: Copyright Law and Digitisation Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions. New Zealand Law Foundation Report. |
| Cotropia and Gibson (2014) | Cotropia, C. A., & Gibson, J. (2014). Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation. Texas Law Review, 92(7). |
| Denoyelle et al (2018) | Denoyelle, M., Durand, K., Daniel, J. and Doulkaridou-Ramantani, E. (2018) Image rights, art history and society. Report presented to the Foundation de France <https://www.inha.fr/fr/recherche/le-departement-des-etudes-et-de-la-recherche/domaines-de-recherche/programmes-en-cours/images-usages.html> (accessed 7 January 2022) |
| Dryden (2008) | Dryden, J.E., 2008. Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto). |
| Dulong de Rosnay and Langlais (2017) | Dulong de Rosnay, M. and Langlais, P. (2017) Public artworks and the freedom of panorama controversy: a case of Wikimedia influence. Internet Policy Review Vol. 6(1) |
| Dusollier (2010) | Dusollier, S., WIPO (2010) CDIP/4/3/REV./STUDY/INF/1. |
| EUIPO (2017) | EUIPO (2017) European Citizens and intellectual Property: Perception, awareness and behaviour. A survey commissioned to Deloitte. |
| Ehlinger et al. (2024b) | Ehlinger, A., Thomas, A., Kretschmer, M., Battisti, M., and Saenz de Juano Ribes, H. (2024) UK Visual Artists: A survey of earnings and contracts. CREATe Report. |
| Elkin-Koren and Netanel (2020) | Elkin-Koren, N. & Netanel, N. W. (2020) Transplanting Fair Use Across the Globe: A Case Study Testing the Credibility of US Opposition, Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series. 50. |
| Engstrom and Feamster (2017) | Engstrom, E. And Feamster, N. (2017) The Limits of Filtering: A Look at the Functionality & Shortcomings of Content Detection Tools. Available: https://www.engine.is/the-limits-of-filtering (last accessed 23 May 2019) |
| Envisional (2011) | Envisional (2011), Technical report: An Estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet |
| Erickson (2024) | Erickson, K. (2024) AI and work in the creative industries: digital continuity or discontinuity? Creative Industries Journal. |
| Erickson, Rodriguez Perez and Rodriguez Perez (2018) | Erickson, K, Rodriguez Perez, F and Rodriguez Perez, J (2018) What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. OpenSym ’18: The 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 22-24 Aug 2018, Paris, France. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). ISBN 978-1-4503-59 36-8 |
| Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013) | Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498. |
| Fortney and Hansen (2023) | Fortney, K. and Hansen, D. (2023) ‘Assessing the Copyright Small Claims Court After One Year’ 70 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. |
| Gaustad, Eidsvold-Toien and Viken (2019) | Gaustad, T., Eidsvold-Toien, I. and Viken, M. (2019) ‘Enforcing Copyright Online in Scandinavia: Economic Consequences of Nuances in National Implementations of International Law’, B1 Norwegian Business School. |
| Gecer and Topal (2019) | Gecer, A.K. and Topal, A.D. (2019) Academic and postgraduate student awareness of digital product copyright issues. Information Development. |
| Gowers (2006) | Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office. |
| Green (2021) | Green, D. (2021). Learning to Let Go: Ownership, Rights, Fees, and Permissions of Readers’ Photographs. Anglia, 139(1), 59-70. |
| Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010) | Greenhalgh, C., Philips, J., Pitkethly, R., Rogers, M., & Tomalin, J. (2010). Intellectual Property Enforcement in Smaller UK Firms. Report for the Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP). |
| Hadopi (2011) | HADOPI. 2011. Hadopi, cultural assets and internet use: practices and perceptions of French internet users (Online). Available: http://www.hadopi.fr/download/HADOPI_T0_version_long.pdf. |
| Hansen, Hashimoto, Hinze, Samuelson and Urban (2013) | Hansen, D. R., Hashimoto, K., Hinze, G., Samuelson, P., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Solving the orphan works problem for the united states. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 37(1). |
| Hargreaves (2011) | Hargreaves, I. (2011). Digital Opportunity. A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, |
| Heald, Erickson and Kretschmer (2015) | Heald, P. J., Kretschmer, M., & Erickson, K. (2015). The Valuation of Unprotected Works: A Case Study of Public Domain Photographs on Wikipedia. Available at SSRN. |
| Hooper and Lynch (2012a) | Hooper, R., & Lynch, R. (2012). Rights and wrongs: Is copyright licensing fit for purpose for the digital age? The first report of the Digital Copyright Exchange feasibility study, IPO. |
| Hooper and Lynch (2012b) | Hooper, R., & Lynch, R. (2012). Copyright works: Streamlining copyright licensing for the digital age. Intellectual Property Office: Newport. |
| Hudson and Kenyon (2007) | Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A.T., 2007. Digital Access: The Impact of Copyright on Digitisation Practices in Australian Museums, Galleries, Libraries, and Archives. UNSWLJ, 30, p.12. |
| Kelly (2013) | Kelly, K. (2013) Images of Works of Art in Museum Collections: The Experience of Open Access. Mellon Foundation Study <https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub157/> (accessed 6 January 2022) |
| Kelly (2019) | Kelly, E.J. (2019) Digital Cultural Heritage and Wikimedia Commons Licenses: Copyright or Copywrong? Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship, 3(3) |
| Landes and Posner (2003a) | Landes, W. and Posner, R.A. (2003) Indefinitely Renewable Copyright. 70 University of Chicago Law School Review 471 |
| Liu (2019) | Liu, J. (2019) An Empirical Study of Transformative Use in Copyright Law. Stan. Tech. L.Rev. 22(1) pp. 164 - 241 |
| Luo and Mortimer (2018) | Luo, H. And Mortimer, J.H. (2019) Infringing Use as a Path to Legal Consumption: Evidence from a Field Experiment . NBER Working paper No. 25453. |
| Maguire (2025) | Maguire, R. (2025) Copyright and Anonymity in the Creative User-Generated World. Hart Publishing First Edition. |
| Marshall and Shipman (2019) | Marshall, C.C. & Shipman, F.M. (2019) The Ownership and Control of Online Photos and Game Data: Patterns, Trends, and Keeping Pace with Evolving Circumstances. 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries |
| ... further results | |
