Semantic search

From Copyright EVIDENCE
Danaher and Waldfogel (2012)Danaher, B., & Waldfogel, J. (2012). Reel Piracy: The Effect of Online Film Piracy on International Box Office Sales. Available at SSRN 1986299.
Danaher et al. (2019)Danaher, Brett and Hersh, Jonathan Samuel and Smith, Michael D. and Telang, Rahul, The Effect of Piracy Website Blocking on Consumer Behavior (August 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: or
Danaher, Smith and Telang (2016)Danaher, B., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R. (2016) Website Blocking Revisited: The Effect of the UK November 2014 Blocks on Consumer Behavior. Report conducted as part of the Carnegie Mellon University’s Initiative for Digital Entertainment Analytics.
Danna, Martinelli and Nuvolari (2021)Danna, R.; Martinelli, A. and Nuvolari, A. (2021) D4.6. Interim report on negative space of EU creative industries <> (Zenodo 5 July 2021) last accessed 7 December 2021
Darling (2014)Darling, K. (2014) What drives IP without IP? A study of the online adult entertainment industry. 17 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 655
De Beer and Bouchard (2010)De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's' Orphan Works' Regime: Unlocatable Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215.
De Souza-Leão et al. (2019)de Souza-Leão, A.L.M., Moura, B.M., de Santana, I.R.C., Nunes, W.K.S. and Henrique, V.M.R. (2019) Fans Make Art: Authoring and Creativity in the Production of Fanvideos. Studies on Emerging Countries, 4(24) pp 22-36
De Wolf and Partners (2013)Triaille, J.P., Dusollier, S., Depreeuw, S., Hubin, J.B. and De Francquen, A., 2013. Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society. InfoSoc Directive.
De Wolf and Partners (2014b)Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-border Digital Transmissions, De Wolf & Partners (2014).
DeVany and Walls (2007)De Vany, A. S., & Walls, W. D. (2007). Estimating the effects of movie piracy on box-office revenue. Review of Industrial Organization, 30(4), 291-301.
Depoorter (2019)Depoorter, B. (2019) Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: When the Remedy is the Wrong. 66 UCLA L. Rev. 400
Depoorter and Vanneste (2006)Depoorter, B. and Vanneste, S., 2006. Norms and enforcement: The case against copyright litigation. Oregon Law Review, 84(4), p.1127.
Dholakiya et al. (2014)Dholakiya, K., Mustapha, N., Niu, B. And Yang, A. (2014) A Micro-Level Examination of Content Takedown’s Consequences. CSCW 14 February 15-19, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dobusch and Quack (2013)Dobusch, L., & Quack, S. (2013). Framing standards, mobilizing users: Copyright versus fair use in transnational regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 20(1), 52-88.
Dusollier (2010)Dusollier, S., WIPO (2010) CDIP/4/3/REV./STUDY/INF/1.
EPO and OHIM (2013)EPO and OHIM (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union.
EY (2014)EY (2014) Creating Growth: Measuring Cultural and Creative Markets in the EU,
Edwards, Klein, Lee, Moss and Philip (2015)Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G., & Philip, F. (2015). Discourse, justification and critique: towards a legitimate digital copyright regime?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(1), 60-77.
Ekiz (2019)Ekiz, O. (2019) Documenting the copyright sphere: can festivals solve the problem of copyright clearance for documentaries? Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 9 (4)
Engel and Kurschilgen (2010)Engel, C., & Kurschilgen, M. J. (2011). Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), pp682-708
Engstrom and Feamster (2017)Engstrom, E. And Feamster, N. (2017) The Limits of Filtering: A Look at the Functionality & Shortcomings of Content Detection Tools. Available: (last accessed 23 May 2019)
Envisional (2011)Envisional (2011), Technical report: An Estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet
Erickson (2014)Erickson, K. (2014) User Illusion: Ideological Construction of ‘User- Generated Content’ in the EC Consultation on Copyright. Internet Policy Review 4(3). DOI:10.14763/2014.4.331
Erickson and Kretschmer (2019)Erickson, K. And Kretschmer, M. (2019) Empirical Approaches to Intermediary Liability in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY ONLINE (ed. Giancarlo Frosio), Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
Erickson, Perez and Sinha (2017)Erickson, K., Perez, J.R. and Sinha, S. (2017) How Much Do Consumers Value Interoperability? Evidence from the Price of DVD Players. Available: (last accessed 12/03/2023)
European Commission (2016)European Commission (2016) Synopsis Report on the Public Consultation on the Regulatory Environment for Platforms, Online Intermediaries and the Collaborative Economy,
Farooqui, Goodridge and Haskel (2011)Farooqui, S., Goodridge, P., & Haskel, J. (2011). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the UK Market Sector. Intellectual Property, 2.
Favale (2011)Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323
Fetscherin (2005)Fetscherin, M. (2005). Movie piracy on peer-to-peer networks—the case of KaZaA. Telematics and Informatics, 22(1), 57-70.
Fetscherin and Schmid (2003)Fetscherin, M. and Schmid, M. (2003) Comparing the usage of digital rights management systems in the music, film and print industry. ICEC ’03 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic Commerce, 316-325
Fiesler and Bruckman (2019)Fiesler, C. and Bruckman, A. (2019) Creativity, Copyright, and Close-Knit Communities: A Case Study of Social Norm Formation and Enforcement. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3,
Fiesler and Zacher (2021) 2Fiesler, C. & Zacher, C. Copyright’s Chilling Tale of Content Moderation: Understanding the Impact of Takedowns on Non-Infringing Content Creators. Available: (last accessed: 3 June 2021)
Fiesler, Feuston and Bruckman (2015)Fiesler, C., Feuston, J. L., & Bruckman, A. S. (2015, February). Understanding Copyright Law in Online Creative Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 116-129). ACM.
Fiesler, Lampe, and Bruckman (2016)Fiesler, C, Lampe, C, Bruckman, A (2016) “Reality and Perception of Copyright Terms of Service for Online Content Creation” CSCW ’16 Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp1450-1461
Filiciak, Hofmokl and Tarkowski (2012)Filiciak, M., Hofmokl, J., & Tarkowski, A. (2012). The Circulations of Culture-On Social Distribution of Content. Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities: September 1st, 2012. Available at SSRN 2246508.
Flynn and Palmedo (2017)Flynn, S. and Palmedo, M. (2017) The User Rights Database: Measuring the Impact of Copyright Balance. Available at SSRN: or
Frank N. Magid Associates (2009)Frank, N. Magid Associates. 2009. Introducing Hollywood’s best customers: Vuze user vs. general internet: Comparative data.
Garcia-Bardidia, Nau and Remy (2011)Garcia-Bardidia, R., Nau, J. P., & Rémy, E. (2011). Consumer Resistance and Anti-Consumption: Insights from the Deviant Careers of French Illegal Downloaders. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1789-1798.
Gecer and Topal (2019)Gecer, A.K. and Topal, A.D. (2019) Academic and postgraduate student awareness of digital product copyright issues. Information Development.
Gerhardt (2011)Gerhardt, D. R. (2011). Copyright publication: an empirical study. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1).
GfK Belgium (2015)GfK Belgium, Provision of two online consumer surveys as support and evidence base to a Commission study: Identifying the main cross-border obstacles to the Digital Single Market and where they matter most
Goel, Miesing and Chandra (2010)Goel, S., Miesing, P., & Chandra, U. (2010). The impact of illegal peer-to-peer file sharing on the media industry. California Management Review, 52(3), 6-33.
Gomez and Martens (2015)Gómez, Estrella and Martens, Bertin, Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital Single Market for Music and Film (May 6, 2015). JRC/IPTS Digital Economy working paper 2015-04.
Goodridge, Haskel and Mitra-Kahn (2012)Goodridge, P., Haskel, J. & Mitra-Kahn, B. (2012) Updating the value of UK copyright investment, IPO, 2012
Gordon (1982)Gordon, W. J. (1982). Fair use as market failure: a structural and economic analysis of the" Betamax" case and its predecessors. Columbia Law Review, 82(8), 1600-1657.
Gowers (2006)Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office.
Guibault, Salamanca and van Gompel (2015)Guibault, L., Salamanca, O. and van Gompel, S. (2015) Remuneration of authors and performers for the use of their works and the fixations of their performances. A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by Europe Economics and IVIR.
Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)Guibault et al., Study on the Implementation and Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (2007)
Gunter (2009)Gunter, W.D. (2009) Internet Scallywags: A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Forms and Measurements of Digital Piracy. Western Criminology Review10(1):15-28
Hadopi (2011)HADOPI. 2011. Hadopi, cultural assets and internet use: practices and perceptions of French internet users (Online). Available: