Browse data: Studies

From Copyright EVIDENCE

Choose a category:

  • Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method : Archival Research or Document Research or Qualitative Collection Methods or Quantitative Collection Methods or Quantitative data/text mining or Structured Interview & Evidence Based Policies: B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Author:
Year:
1982 (1) · 1984 (1) · 1993 (1) · 1997 (1) · 1999 (1) · 2000 (2) · 2002 (2) · 2003 (1) · 2004 (1) · 2005 (1) · 2006 (3) · 2007 (4) · 2008 (4) · 2009 (4) · 2010 (6) · 2011 (7) · 2012 (4) · 2013 (9) · 2014 (8) · 2015 (19) · 2016 (4) · 2017 (3) · 2018 (4) · 2019 (4) · 2020 (3) · 2021 (3) · 2022 (3)
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Primary and Secondary data (26) · Primary data (46) · Secondary data (32)
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (4) · Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (1) · Correlation and Association (8) · Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (21) · Discourse Analysis (6) · Ethnographic/narrative analysis (2) · Factor Analysis (2) · Grounded Theory (1) · Legal Analysis (37) · Multivariate Statistics (6) · Qualitative Analysis Methods (57) · Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (17) · Quantitative Analysis Methods (49) · Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (31) · Regression Analysis (10) · Social Network Analysis (1) · Structural Equation Modeling (1) · Textual Content Analysis (39) · Triangulation (1) · Visual / Other Content Analysis (2)
Country:
Cross country study:
No (66) · Yes (38)
Comparative study:
No (75) · Yes (29)
Literature review:
No (87) · Yes (15)
Government or policy study:
No (78) · Yes (24)
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1) · Arts and Humanities Research Council (1) · Australian Digital Alliance (1) · Australian Government (1) · Canadian Association of Research Libraries (1) · Commonwealth of Australia (1) · Consumer Focus (1) · Economic and Social Research Council (1) · Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) · European Commission (4) · European Parliament (1) · German Institute for Economic Research (1) · Google (1) · Groupement Européen des Sociétés d’Auteurs et Compositeurs (1) · H2020 reCreating Europe (1) · HM Treasury (2) · IPO (2) · Intellectual Property Office (2) · JISC (1) · National Science Foundation (award #1216247) (1) · Not Stated (1) · Not stated (2) · RCUK Funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) (1) · South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant No 98405) (1) · The American Council on Consumer Interests (1) · The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) · The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) · This Report was prepared for APRA AMCOS, PPCA, Copyright Agency│Viscopy, Foxtel, News Corp Australia and Screenrights. (1) · This work was partially supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme, project number 262762, and through the research project MASHED, project number 249817 (1) · UK Economic and Social Research Council (1) · United Nations (1) · WIPO (3) · We 
thank 
the
 National
 Human 
Genome 
Research
 Initiative 
for 
a 
generous 
grant 
supporting 
this
 work (1) · Western New England College School of Law (1) · World Intellectual Property Organization (6)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (80) · 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (29) · 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (20) · 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (39) · 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (37)
Evidence Based Policies: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data sample size:
1 - 4 (16) · 4 - 12 (18) · 12 - 50 (19) · 50 - 200 (18) · 200 - 1,000 (15) · 1,000 - 200,000 (19)
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Data industry:
Advertising (2) · Architectural (1) · Computer consultancy (5) · Computer programming (6) · Creative, arts and entertainment (36) · Cultural education (28) · Film and motion pictures (26) · Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (19) · PR and communication (1) · Photographic activities (14) · Programming and broadcasting (7) · Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (46) · Software publishing (19) · Sound recording and music publishing (31) · Specialised design (3) · Television programmes (15) · Translation and interpretation (4) · Video game publishing (1)

Showing below up to 104 results in range #1 to #104.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
L cont.
M
N
P
R
S
T
V
W
X
Z


View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "https://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php/Special:BrowseData/Studies"