Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Case Study or
Document Research or
Historical Methods or
Qualitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Structured Interview
& Evidence Based Policies:
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
:
Case Study or
Document Research or
Historical Methods or
Qualitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Structured Interview
& Evidence Based Policies:
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (1) ·
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (1) ·
Correlation and Association (9) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (13) ·
Discourse Analysis (4) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (6) ·
Grounded Theory (2) ·
Legal Analysis (19) ·
Meta-Analysis (1) ·
Multivariate Statistics (2) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (36) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (12) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (23) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (18) ·
Regression Analysis (8) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (2) ·
Textual Content Analysis (18)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
AHRC (1) ·
AHRC grant noAH/K001841 (1) ·
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1) ·
Arts and Humanities Research Council (2) ·
Australia Council (1) ·
Australia Council for the Arts (1) ·
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (1) ·
Australian Research Council (LP160100387/FT170100011) (1) ·
Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
Canadian Association of Research Libraries (1) ·
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (1) ·
Consumer Focus (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) ·
European Commission (3) ·
European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (1) ·
House of Commons (1) ·
Monash University (1) ·
National Science Foundation (1) ·
None (2) ·
Not Specified (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Pew Internet and American Life Project (1) ·
Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (1) ·
Queen Elizabeth Scholar programme (1) ·
The Creators’ Rights Alliance (1) ·
The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1820/17) (1) ·
The Leverhulme Trust (2) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
This Report was prepared for APRA AMCOS, PPCA, Copyright Agency│Viscopy, Foxtel, News Corp Australia and Screenrights. (1) ·
This research was funded in part by a PSCCUNY grant #67792-00-36 and a Doctoral Student Research Grant from the CUNY Graduate Center. (1) ·
Toulouse Network on Information Technology (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (3) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2) ·
de Thuiskopie (1) ·
openAir - African Innovation Research (1) ·
the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (1) ·
the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (41) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (34) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (15) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (26) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (16)
Evidence Based Policies: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Artists (3) ·
Authors (1) ·
Books (1) ·
Case study (3) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Company (2) ·
Concerts (1) ·
Copyright Law Suits (1) ·
Copyright legal system (1) ·
Digital Sales in 6 European Music Markets (1) ·
Economic model (3) ·
Firm (1) ·
Governmental Representatives (1) ·
Individual (11) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Law journals (1) ·
Legal experts (1) ·
Musicians and Songwriters (1) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Present value of additional compensation calculation (1) ·
Price observations (1) ·
Publications (1) ·
Recording Artists (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Stakeholders (4) ·
Subsidy policy (1) ·
Systems of fair use in copyright (1) ·
Work made for hire cases (1) ·
book contracts (1) ·
case study (1) ·
first performances (1) ·
year (1)
Data material year:
1667 (1) ·
1770-1900 (1) ·
1960-2014 (1) ·
1988 (1) ·
1989-2014 (1) ·
1993-2004 (1) ·
2 Months (1) ·
2000 to 2005 (1) ·
2001 to 2003 (1) ·
2002 to 2004 (1) ·
2002-2006 (1) ·
2003 (1) ·
2004 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2006 (2) ·
2007-2012 (1) ·
2008 (1) ·
2008-2011 (1) ·
2009 (2) ·
2010 (2) ·
2011 (2) ·
2011 to 2015 (1) ·
2012 (3) ·
2012-2013 (1) ·
2013 (2) ·
2014 (4) ·
2014-2016 (1) ·
2015 (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Not stated (5)
Data industry:
Advertising (2) ·
Architectural (1) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (32) ·
Cultural education (1) ·
Film and motion pictures (9) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (3) ·
Photographic activities (2) ·
Programming and broadcasting (5) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (20) ·
Software publishing (6) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (22) ·
Specialised design (2) ·
Television programmes (7) ·
Video game publishing (2)
Showing below up to 64 results in range #1 to #64.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Aguilar (2019)
- Aguilar (2019a)
- Akerlof, Hahn and Litan (2002)
- Altschuller and Benbunan-Fich (2009)
- Asser Institute and IViR (2014)
B
- Band (2013a)
- Banks and Humphreys (2008)
- Batikas, Claussen and Peukert (2019)
- Bellégo and Nijs (2020)
- Bently (2002)
- Bently et al. (2017)
C
D
- Danaher, Smith, Telang and Chen (2012)
- Deazley (2008)
- Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2021)
E
F
G
G cont.
H
I
J
K
L
M
O
P
R
R cont.
S
T
- Throsby and Petetskya (2017)
- Throsby and Zednik (2010)
- Tor and Oliar (2002)
- Towse (2015)
- Towse (2016)
- Towse (2018)
U
- United States Copyright Office (2013a)
- United States Copyright Office (2015a)
- United States Copyright Office (2015b)
V
W
- Waelde and Schlesinger (2011)
- What the Online Piracy Data Tells Us About Copyright Policymaking
- Wijmenga, Klomp, van der Jagt, Poort (2016)
X
Y
Z
