Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method :
Document Research or
Ethnography or
Focus Groups or
Qualitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Structured Interview
& Data industry:
Photographic activities
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
A1: General Economics (2) ·
C13: Estimation: General (1) ·
D23: Organizational Behavior • Transaction Costs • Property Rights (1) ·
D61: Allocative Efficiency • Cost–Benefit Analysis (1) ·
K11: Property Law (2) ·
K39: Other (1) ·
K41: Litigation Process (2) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (3) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (2) ·
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (6) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (22) ·
O38: Government Policy (9) ·
O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights (1) ·
O57: Comparative Studies of Countries (1) ·
Z18: Public Policy (1) ·
Other (24) ·
None (1)
Copyright laws (1) ·
European Commission (1) ·
European Public Domain Calculators (1) ·
Industry (1) ·
Legislative review (1) ·
LexisNexis (1) ·
Literature review (1) ·
Lumen (2) ·
NESTA (1) ·
Office for National Statistics (1) ·
Policy Reports (1) ·
Pre-existing Academic Research (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (2) ·
SABIP (1) ·
Statutory exceptions (1) ·
Various (1) ·
WIPO (1) ·
Westlaw (1)
Cluster analysis (1) ·
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (1) ·
Correlation and Association (4) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (4) ·
Discourse Analysis (2) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (2) ·
Legal Analysis (12) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (13) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (4) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (9) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (9) ·
Regression Analysis (1) ·
Textual Content Analysis (13)
Australia (3) ·
Belgium (1) ·
Canada (3) ·
Czech Republic (1) ·
Denmark (1) ·
European Union (4) ·
France (3) ·
Germany (1) ·
Global (2) ·
Hungary (1) ·
India (2) ·
Israel (1) ·
Italy (2) ·
Japan (2) ·
Korea (1) ·
New Zealand (1) ·
Singapore (1) ·
Spain (1) ·
Sweden (1) ·
The Netherlands (1) ·
United Kingdom (8) ·
United States (9)
2001 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2008 (1) ·
2009 to 2011 (1) ·
2010 (2) ·
2010-2011
Pre-2011 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2012 (1) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (1) ·
2014-2015 (1) ·
2015 (1) ·
2016 (1) ·
January 2017 (1) ·
May - October 2013 (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
November 2009 (1) ·
October 2012 - December 2015 (1) ·
Pre-2006 (1)
Australian Government (1) ·
CREATe, Grant Number AH/K000179/1 (1) ·
Centennial scholarships (1) ·
European Commission (1) ·
Google (1) ·
HM Treasury (2) ·
Hadopi (1) ·
I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
International Postgraduate Research (1) ·
Israeli Internet Association (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Sloan Foundation (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (21) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (1) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (7) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (14) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (8)
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (5) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (14) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (13) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (8) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (2) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (7)
Case study (1) ·
Company (1) ·
Copyright Law Suits (1) ·
Country (4) ·
Cultural Heritage Institutions (4) ·
Cultural Institutions (1) ·
Individual (4) ·
Individual Staff (1) ·
Individuals (1) ·
Museums (1) ·
Responses to Call for Evidence (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Stakeholders (2) ·
Submissions (1) ·
Takedown Requests (1) ·
Wikipedia webpages (1) ·
authors (1) ·
composers and lyricists (1)
1990 to 2011 (1) ·
2001 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2006 (1) ·
2008 (1) ·
2009 (1) ·
2009 to 2011 (1) ·
2010 (2) ·
2012 (1) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (1) ·
2014-2015 (1) ·
2016 (1) ·
Not stated (1)
Showing below up to 25 results in range #1 to #25.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
C
- Canat, Guibault and Logeais (2015)
- Cooper and Burrow (2018)
- Corbett (2011)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
D
D cont.
E
F
G
H
H cont.
L
M
T
U
V