Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Document Research or
Focus Groups or
Historical Methods or
Snowball sampling
& Data unit of assessment:
Stakeholders
:
Document Research or
Focus Groups or
Historical Methods or
Snowball sampling
& Data unit of assessment:
Stakeholders Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
Beisner (2010) (1) ·
Broussard (2009) (1) ·
Copyright Law Review Committee (2000) (1) ·
Crews (2014) (1) ·
Froschauer (2008) (1) ·
Ginsburg (2014) (1) ·
Guibault (2014) (1) ·
Hansen (2012) (1) ·
Hargreaves (2011) (2) ·
Hargreaves (2012) (1) ·
Hugenholtz and Okedji (2008) (1) ·
Katz (2005) (1) ·
Kohn (2010) (1) ·
Litman (2010) (1) ·
McCarthy (2013) (1) ·
Nimmer (2013) (1) ·
Passman (2013) (1) ·
Perlmutter (1991-1992) (1) ·
Peters (2005) (1) ·
Raustiala and Sprigman (2011) (1) ·
Ricketson and Ginsburg (2006) (1) ·
Samuelson (2011) (1) ·
Samuelson and Wheatland (2009) (1) ·
Towse (2011) (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (1992) (1)
Discipline:
K23: Regulated Industries and Administrative Law (1) ·
K40: General (1) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (1) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (2) ·
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives (2) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (1) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (7) ·
O38: Government Policy (7) ·
Z11: Economics of the Arts and Literature (2) ·
Other (7)
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Country:
Literature review:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (4) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (3) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (5) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (3)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (2) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (2) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (3) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (4) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (3) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (1)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data material year:
Data industry:
Creative, arts and entertainment (4) ·
Cultural education (1) ·
Film and motion pictures (1) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (2) ·
Photographic activities (2) ·
Programming and broadcasting (1) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (2) ·
Software publishing (1) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (2) ·
Television programmes (1)
Showing below up to 7 results in range #1 to #7.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
