Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Experimental (Field) or
Focus Groups or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting)
& Data analysis method:
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)
:
Experimental (Field) or
Focus Groups or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting)
& Data analysis method:
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Alliance for IP (1) ·
Anti-Copying in Design (1) ·
Anti-Counterfeiting Group (1) ·
Artists’ Collecting Society (1) ·
Australian Society of Authors (1) ·
Big Innovation Centre (1) ·
Billboard Chart (1) ·
British Copyright Council (1) ·
British Library (1) ·
British Phonographic Industry (1) ·
British Screen Advisory Council (1) ·
CLA datasets (1) ·
Case law (2) ·
Copyright Licensing Agency (1) ·
Crown Prosecution Service (1) ·
Federation Against Copyright Theft (1) ·
Federation Against Software Theft (1) ·
Ministry of Justice (1) ·
Motion Picture Association (1) ·
Newspaper Licensing Association (1) ·
Open Data Institute (1) ·
Open Rights Group (1) ·
Open letter from Steve Jobs and response from Tim Amoroso from Macrovision (1) ·
PRS for Music (1) ·
Pew Internet Project (1) ·
Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (1) ·
Publishers Association (1) ·
RIAA (1) ·
RIAJ (1) ·
Recording Industry Association of America (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (1) ·
Trading Standards (1) ·
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (1) ·
U.S. Census Bureau (1) ·
UK Interactive Entertainment (1) ·
UK Music (1) ·
US Federal Court Decisions (1)
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Arts and Humanities Research Council (1) ·
Australia Council (1) ·
Australian Digital Alliance (Pappalardo et al.) (1) ·
Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship (project number DE160101542) (1) ·
British Phonographic Industry (1) ·
British Video Association (BVA) (1) ·
Business Software Alliance (1) ·
CREATe, AHRC Grant Number AH/K000179/1 (1) ·
Canadian Library Association (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Entertainment & Leisure Software Publishers Association (1) ·
European Commission (5) ·
Federation Against Copyright Theft (1) ·
Ford Foundation (1) ·
Fulbright Fellowship (1) ·
Google Inc. (1) ·
Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 870626 (1) ·
IPO (3) ·
IdeaLab Research Group (The Complutense University of Madrid) (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
International Development Research Centre (1) ·
International Intellectual Property Alliance (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (1) ·
National Science Foundation EAGER (1) ·
None stated (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Open Society Foundations (1) ·
Organised Crime Task Force (1) ·
RCUK Funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) (1) ·
The Patent Office (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The financial support for this project was given by the Leverholm Trust and the Herchel Smith Intellectual Property Research Fund, Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
This research was funded in part by a PSCCUNY grant #67792-00-36 and a Doctoral Student Research Grant from the CUNY Graduate Center. (1) ·
This work was partially supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme, project number 262762, and through the research project MASHED, project number 249817 (1) ·
UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC, ESRC-IAA Business Boost Award) (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (4) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (38) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (7) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (5) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (19) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (30)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (13) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (20) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (9) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (22) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (11) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (18)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Authors (1) ·
Case Study (1) ·
Chefs (1) ·
Company (2) ·
Consumer (1) ·
Copyright cases (1) ·
Country (1) ·
Creators (1) ·
Cultural Heritage Institutions (2) ·
Digital heritage practitioners (1) ·
Economic indicators (1) ·
Experts (1) ·
Federal Judgement Opinions (1) ·
Filmmakers (1) ·
Focus Groups (2) ·
Focus group (1) ·
Forum posts (1) ·
Individual (12) ·
Individual Copyright Offences (1) ·
Individual Staff (1) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Interviews (1) ·
Kickstarter projects (1) ·
Legal experts (1) ·
Museums (1) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Organisations (1) ·
Questionnaires (1) ·
Stakeholders (6) ·
Students (1) ·
Wikipedia pages (1)
Data material year:
1978 to 2005 (1) ·
2003-2004 (1) ·
2003-2007 (1) ·
2003-2013 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2006 (3) ·
2006-2013 (1) ·
2007 (1) ·
2009 (2) ·
2009-2014 (1) ·
2010-2013 (1) ·
2011 (2) ·
2012 (3) ·
2012-2013 (2) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (5) ·
2014-2015 (1) ·
2015 (3) ·
2015-2016 (1) ·
2016 (1) ·
2017 (1) ·
2021 (1) ·
January - April 2014 (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
November 2011 – May 2012 (1) ·
October 2014 - September 2015 (1) ·
Unknown (1)
Data industry:
Computer consultancy (1) ·
Computer programming (2) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (21) ·
Cultural education (11) ·
Film and motion pictures (17) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (10) ·
Photographic activities (5) ·
Programming and broadcasting (4) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (20) ·
Software publishing (12) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (23) ·
Specialised design (2) ·
Television programmes (9) ·
Video game publishing (1)
Showing below up to 55 results in range #1 to #55.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Akester (2009)
- Altschuller and Benbunan-Fich (2009)
- Asser Institute and IViR (2014)
- Aufderheide et al. (2018)
- Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)
B
- Beebe (2008)
- Bmrb Social Research (2009)
- Brassell and Goodyer (2015)
- Bryce and Rutter (2005)
- Brøvig-Hanssen and Jones (2021)
C
D
E
- Erickson, Heald, Homberg, Kretschmer and Mendis (2015)
- European Commission (2016)
- European Union Intellectual Property Office (2016)
F
F cont.
- Favale, Kretschmer and Torremans (2016)
- Favale, Kretschmer and Torremans (2018)
- Fiesler and Zacher (2021) 2
- Fiesler, Feuston and Bruckman (2015)
- Fiesler, Lampe, and Bruckman (2016)
- Flynn and Palmedo (2017)
G
H
I
K
L
M
P
R
S
- Secker, Gadd and Morrison (2019)
- Serrano et al. (2019)
- Shaheed (2014)
- Siwek (2009)
- Stobo, Deazley and Anderson (2013)
T
U
