Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Participant Observation or
Quantitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Semi-Structured Interview or
Unstructured Interview
& Data industry:
Television programmes
:
Participant Observation or
Quantitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Semi-Structured Interview or
Unstructured Interview
& Data industry:
Television programmes Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (4) ·
Correlation and Association (13) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (33) ·
Discourse Analysis (7) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (3) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Grounded Theory (2) ·
Legal Analysis (11) ·
Meta-Analysis (2) ·
Multivariate Statistics (4) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (20) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (16) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (27) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (19) ·
Regression Analysis (9) ·
Social Network Analysis (1) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (3) ·
Textual Content Analysis (11)
Country:
Australia (7) ·
Brazil (3) ·
Canada (2) ·
China (2) ·
Cuba (1) ·
Europe (1) ·
European Union (8) ·
France (4) ·
Germany (3) ·
Global (15) ·
Hungary (1) ·
Italy (1) ·
New Zealand (1) ·
Poland (1) ·
Portugal (1) ·
South Korea (1) ·
Spain (2) ·
The Netherlands (2) ·
United Kingdom (20) ·
United States (28) ·
Unknown (1) ·
Vietnam (1)
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2) ·
Australian Copyright Council (2) ·
Australian Research Council (1) ·
Centel Foundation/Robert P. Reuss Faculty Research Fund (1) ·
Centre for Copyright and New Business Model in the Creative Economy (CREATe) (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
ESRC (UK) Grant No. RES–186–27–0012 (1) ·
European Commission (2) ·
European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (1) ·
Fulbright Senior Research grant (1) ·
Google Inc. (1) ·
HM Treasury (2) ·
Hadopi (1) ·
IPO (4) ·
Intellectual Property Office (8) ·
Mack Center (1) ·
NBC Universal (1) ·
National Science Foundation (2) ·
National Science Foundation (award #1216247) (1) ·
National University of Singapore through the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (1) ·
RCUK (1) ·
Research Councils UK (1) ·
SABIP (1) ·
The Sloan Foundation (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
This research was part of the multicountry research project 'Towards a Detente in Media Piracy' undertaken by the Association for Progressive Communications (ACP) and supported bu the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), New York (1) ·
University of East Anglia (1) ·
University of Queensland (1) ·
Vietnam National University in Ho Chi Minh City (Grant number C2017-20-41) (1) ·
WIPO (2) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (32) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (7) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (3) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (27) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (45)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (19) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (10) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (4) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (22) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (4) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (49)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Australian copyright industries (2) ·
Cases (2) ·
Company (2) ·
Competition agencies (1) ·
Copyright Law Suits (1) ·
Country (4) ·
Creative industries (1) ·
Creators (1) ·
Focus group (1) ·
Forum post (1) ·
Household (1) ·
Individual (15) ·
Individual Copyright Offences (1) ·
Individual data (1) ·
Internet user (1) ·
Links (1) ·
Market (1) ·
News articles (1) ·
Pages of Discussion (1) ·
Qualitative interviews (1) ·
Responses to Call for Evidence (1) ·
Responses to Calls for Evidence (1) ·
Responses to calls for evidence (1) ·
Stakeholders (1) ·
Studies (3) ·
TV Episodes (1) ·
Takedown Notices (1) ·
Takedown Rquests (1) ·
Takedown complaints (1) ·
Takedown requests (1) ·
Threads (1) ·
Tweets (1) ·
US Copyright Office Registrations (1) ·
University students (1) ·
Videos (1) ·
Websites (1)
Data material year:
1 January 2011 – 31 December 2015 (1) ·
1 October 2018 – 30 April 2019 (1) ·
1/03/2013-13/04/2013 (1) ·
1984 to 2013 (1) ·
1996-2007 (1) ·
1998 to 2013 (1) ·
1999 to 2015 (1) ·
2000 (1) ·
2001-2006 (1) ·
2002-2014 (1) ·
2003-2009 (2) ·
2003-2013 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2005-2007 (1) ·
2006 (3) ·
2006-2013 (1) ·
2007 (1) ·
2007-2008 (1) ·
2007-2009 (1) ·
2008-2009 (1) ·
2008-2012 (2) ·
2009-2014 (1) ·
2010 (1) ·
2010-2011 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2011-12 (2) ·
2011-2012 (2) ·
2012 (5) ·
2012-2013 (1) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (1) ·
2015 (1) ·
2019 (1) ·
31 December 2012 (1) ·
Non stated (2) ·
Not stated (1)
Data industry: (Click arrow to add another value)
Showing below up to 76 results in range #1 to #76.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
- BOP Consulting and DotEcon (2015)
- Batikas, Claussen and Peukert (2019)
- Beard, Ford and Stern (2018)
- Bechtold (2013)
- Borghi, Maggiolino, Montagnani and Nuccio (2012)
- Brassell and Goodyer (2015)
C
- Charles River Associates (2013)
- Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
- Cuntz and Bergquist (2020)
D
- Danahar, Smith and Teland (2015)
- Danaher, Dhanasobhon, Smith and Telang (2010)
- Depoorter (2019)
- Depoorter and Walker (2013)
- Dholakiya et al. (2014)
- Dootson and Suzor (2015)
E
F
G
H
- Hadopi (2011)
- Hargreaves (2011)
- Holt and Copes (2010)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012a)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012b)
I
- IHS Technology (2015)
- IP Crime Annual Report (2015-2016)
- IP Crime Annual Report (2016-2017)
- IP Crime Annual Report (2017-2018)
- Ibosiola et al. (2019)
- Intellectual Property Office, Kantar Media (2016)
K
L
M
- Mandel and Suessmuth (2012)
- Max Planck Institute (2013)
- Moreno and Sepúlveda (2021)
- Morris and Higgins (2009)
O
P
P cont.
R
S
- Sag and Haskell (2018)
- Sandvine (2018)
- Sarikakis, Krug and Rodriguez-Amat (2017)
- Schwind (2018)
- Seng (2015)
- Seng (2021)
- Silbey (2014b)
- Singh and Kretschmer (2012)
- Steinmetz and Tunnell (2013)
- Strzelecki (2018)
T
U
W
- Waldfogel (2009)
- Waldfogel (2017)
- Watson, Zizzo and Fleming (2014)
- Watson, Zizzo and Fleming (2015)
- World Intellectual Property Organization (2014)
X
Y
