Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method :
Quantitative data/text mining or
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting)
& Data analysis method:
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining)
& Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
Discipline:
Secondary Data Source:
Australia (7) ·
Brazil (3) ·
Bulgaria (1) ·
Canada (5) ·
Chile (1) ·
Colombia (1) ·
European Union (17) ·
Finland (1) ·
Germany (2) ·
Global (8) ·
Japan (1) ·
New Zealand (2) ·
Norway (1) ·
Portugal (1) ·
Switzerland (4) ·
Thailand (1) ·
The Netherlands (2) ·
Turkey (1) ·
United Kingdom (12) ·
United States (25)
Time period of data collection:
Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
Comissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board, Library of Congress (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Creative Content Australia (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) ·
European Commision (1) ·
European Commission (5) ·
European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
None (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (1) ·
Robert William University Research Foundation (1) ·
The Finnish Academy (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
WIPO (1) ·
We
thank
the
National
Human
Genome
Research
Initiative
for
a
generous
grant
supporting
this
work (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2) ·
∗Support for this research by NBER’s Economics of Digitization and Copyright Initiative is gratefully acknowledged. (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (41) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (11) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (16) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (41) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (16)
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Computer programming (1) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (10) ·
Cultural education (9) ·
Film and motion pictures (13) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (8) ·
Photographic activities (5) ·
Programming and broadcasting (4) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (20) ·
Software publishing (14) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (17) ·
Specialised design (2) ·
Television programmes (10)
Showing below up to 51 results in range #1 to #51.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Aguiar and Waldfogel (2014)
- Antelman (2004)
- Arendt, Peacemaker and Miller (2018)
- Astle and Muir (2002)
- Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)
B
C
D
E
E cont.
G
H
- Haefliger, Jäger and Von Krogh (2010)
- Heald (2014a)
- Heald (2017a)
- Hudson and Kenyon (2007)
- Humphreys (2008)
I
J
K
L
M
M cont.
- Mendis, Secchi and Reeves (2015)
- Moreno and Sepúlveda (2021)
- Morrison and Secker (2015)
- Mustonen (2005)
O
P
S
T
V
W
Y