Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) or
Web analytic (online user trace data)
& Data analysis method:
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining)
:
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) or
Web analytic (online user trace data)
& Data analysis method:
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
ALCS survey 2007 (1) ·
ALCS survey 2015 (1) ·
Akami Stream Analyzer (1) ·
Alexa (1) ·
Artnet (1) ·
BigChampagne (1) ·
Billboard Chart (1) ·
Bowker Annual (1) ·
Boxofficemojo.com (2) ·
College and Research Libraries (1) ·
Digital Citizen Project (1) ·
Evidon (1) ·
Google (1) ·
HTTPArchive (1) ·
IMDb (2) ·
Literature review (1) ·
Lumen (2) ·
Movie2k.to (1) ·
National studies (1) ·
Nielsen SoundScan (1) ·
Open letter from Steve Jobs and response from Tim Amoroso from Macrovision (1) ·
Pollstar (1) ·
Quantitative Survey Data (1) ·
RIAA (1) ·
RIAA (2007) (1) ·
Recording Industry Association of America (1) ·
Revenue data (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (1) ·
Twitter (1) ·
US Statistical Abstracts (1) ·
Vcdquality.com (1) ·
Whotracks.me (1) ·
WinMX (1) ·
Xerox (1) ·
Yahoo movies (1) ·
YouTube (1)
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
Boston Consulting Group (1) ·
Center for Research in Government Policy and Business at the University of Rochester (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Creative Content Australia (1) ·
Deloitte (1) ·
EUIPO (1) ·
European Commission (5) ·
GE Endowed Professor Fund (1) ·
Google Inc. (1) ·
I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Israeli Internet Association (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
NBC Universal (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (1) ·
Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (1) ·
RCUK Funded Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) (1) ·
Shenkman Family Endowed Chair fund (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The financial support for this project was given by the Leverholm Trust and the Herchel Smith Intellectual Property Research Fund, Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
This research was funded in part by a PSCCUNY grant #67792-00-36 and a Doctoral Student Research Grant from the CUNY Graduate Center. (1) ·
Treibick Electronic Commerce Initiative (1) ·
WIPO (1) ·
We
thank
the
National
Human
Genome
Research
Initiative
for
a
generous
grant
supporting
this
work (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (3) ·
de Thuiskopie (1) ·
the Sloan Foundation (1) ·
∗Support for this research by NBER’s Economics of Digitization and Copyright Initiative is gratefully acknowledged. (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (31) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (10) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (9) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (26) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (26)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (10) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (12) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (8) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (27) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (12) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (28)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Academic Journals (1) ·
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Authors (1) ·
Case Study (1) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Consumer (1) ·
Country (3) ·
Cultural Heritage Institutions (3) ·
Cultural Institution Staff (1) ·
Cultural Institutions (1) ·
Film (2) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Focus group (1) ·
Hour (1) ·
Individual (11) ·
Individual Responses (1) ·
Individual Staff (1) ·
Individuals (1) ·
Interviews (1) ·
Links (1) ·
Music albums (1) ·
News articles (1) ·
Open Source Software (1) ·
P2P communication events (1) ·
P2P users (1) ·
Publications (1) ·
Questionnaires (1) ·
Software Users (1) ·
Stakeholders (2) ·
Studies (1) ·
Takedown notices (1) ·
Torrent swarms (1) ·
Tweets (1) ·
University students (2) ·
Videos (1) ·
Views (1)
Data material year:
1 October 2018 – 30 April 2019 (1) ·
10 days (1) ·
1959-1982 (1) ·
1999 to 2015 (1) ·
1999-2000 (1) ·
2001 (1) ·
2002 (1) ·
2003 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2006 (2) ·
2006-2009 (1) ·
2007 (2) ·
2007 to 2008 (1) ·
2008 (1) ·
2008 to 2009 (1) ·
2009 (2) ·
2009-2014 (1) ·
2010 (1) ·
2010-2011 (1) ·
2010-2013 (1) ·
2011 (2) ·
2011 September and October. (1) ·
2011 to 2012 (1) ·
2012 (3) ·
2012 to 2013 (1) ·
2013 (3) ·
2014 (2) ·
2014-2015 (1) ·
2015 (1) ·
April 2007 (1) ·
Not stated (1)
Data industry:
Advertising (1) ·
Computer programming (1) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (8) ·
Cultural education (8) ·
Film and motion pictures (19) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (9) ·
Photographic activities (6) ·
Programming and broadcasting (5) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (17) ·
Software publishing (15) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (21) ·
Specialised design (1) ·
Television programmes (13)
Showing below up to 50 results in range #1 to #50.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Akester (2009)
- Al-Rafee and Cronan (2006)
- Altschuller and Benbunan-Fich (2009)
- Antelman (2004)
- Arnold, Darmon, Dejean and Penard (2014)
- Astle and Muir (2002)
- Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)
B
- Bar-Ziv and Elkin-Koren (2018)
- Batikas, Claussen and Peukert (2019)
- Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara and Marsden (2006a)
- Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara and Marsden (2006b)
C
D
E
- EUIPO (2017)
- Envisional (2011)
- European Commission (2011a)
- European Commission (2013)
- European Union Intellectual Property Office (2016)
G
H
I
J
K
L
L cont.
M
- Ma, Montgomery, Singh and Smith (2011)
- Mateus and Peha (2008)
- Mateus and Peha (2011)
- Moreno and Sepúlveda (2021)
- Morrison and Secker (2015)
O
P
S
U
V
W
