Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
& Data industry :
Computer consultancy or
Computer programming or
Creative, arts and entertainment or
Programming and broadcasting
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
Discipline:
Secondary Data Source:
Archival Research (2) ·
Case Study (12) ·
Document Research (12) ·
Ethnography (3) ·
Experimental (Natural) (1) ·
Focus Groups (2) ·
Historical Methods (2) ·
Longitudinal Study (3) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (30) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (12) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (32) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (18) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (19) ·
Snowball sampling (1) ·
Structured Interview (3) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (21) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (24) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (8)
Cluster analysis (2) ·
Correlation and Association (9) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (24) ·
Discourse Analysis (5) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (3) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Grounded Theory (5) ·
Legal Analysis (16) ·
Meta-Analysis (3) ·
Multivariate Statistics (5) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (29) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (22) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (26) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (18) ·
Regression Analysis (13) ·
Social Network Analysis (1) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (2) ·
Textual Content Analysis (20) ·
Visual / Other Content Analysis (1)
Australia (7) ·
Belgium (1) ·
Brazil (1) ·
Canada (7) ·
Chile (1) ·
China (1) ·
Colombia (1) ·
Denmark (1) ·
European Union (17) ·
Finland (1) ·
France (5) ·
Germany (6) ·
Global (11) ·
Hungary (1) ·
Ireland (3) ·
Italy (2) ·
Japan (4) ·
Korea (1) ·
Netherlands (1) ·
New Zealand (1) ·
Singapore (1) ·
Switzerland (3) ·
The Netherlands (1) ·
US, EU (1) ·
USA (1) ·
United Kingdom (23) ·
United States (33) ·
Unknown (3)
Time period of data collection:
Australia Council for the Arts (1) ·
Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
Canadian Association of Research Libraries (1) ·
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) ·
European Commission (7) ·
German Institute for Economic Research (1) ·
Google (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Institute (1) ·
International Intellectual Property Alliance (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
Mack Center (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (2) ·
National Museum Directors’ Council (1) ·
National Research Foundation of Korea (2016R1A2A1A05005270) (1) ·
Naval Academy Research Council Grant (1) ·
None (1) ·
None stated (1) ·
Not stated (7) ·
PAI P4/04, Belgian State, Prime Minister’s Office, Science Policy Programming (1) ·
Pew Internet and American Life Project (1) ·
RCUK/CREATe (1) ·
SABIP (1) ·
The Finnish Academy (1) ·
The study was funded by the UK Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
U.K. Economic and Social Research Council grant number ES/K008137/1 (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
WIPO (1) ·
Wikipedia Free Knowledge Advocacy Group (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (57) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (24) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (10) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (38) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (26)
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Showing below up to 82 results in range #1 to #82.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
- Baker and Cunningham (2006)
- Ballon and Westermann (2006)
- Bechtold (2013)
- Belleflamme, Omrani and Peitz (2015)
- Bellégo and Nijs (2020)
- Borghi, Maggiolino, Montagnani and Nuccio (2012)
- Breyer (1970)
- Buxmann, Pohl, Johnscher and Strube (2005)
C
- Castañer and Campos (2002)
- Charles River Associates (2014)
- Cheliotis (2007)
- Collections Trust (2015)
- Commission of the European Communities (2005a)
D
- De Beer and Bouchard (2010)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014a)
- Denoyelle et al (2018)
- Depoorter and Walker (2013)
E
F
G
G cont.
- Giorcelli and Moser (2015)
- Goodridge, Haskel and Mitra-Kahn (2012)
- Gopal, Bhattacharjee and Sanders (2006)
- Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)
H
- Haefliger, Jäger and Von Krogh (2010)
- Handke and Towse (2007)
- Handke, Girard and Mattes (2015)
- Hausberg and Spaeth (2018)
- Hill (2013)
- Humphreys (2008)
I
J
K
- Kapsalis (2016)
- Karaganis and Urban (2015)
- Kelly (2013)
- Kheria (2012)
- Kheria (2013)
- Kim (2007)
- Korn (2009)
- Kretschmer (2011)
- Kretschmer and Hardwick (2007)
- Kretschmer, Bently, Singh and Cooper (2011)
- Kretschmer, Derclaye, Favale and Watt (2010)
- Kretschmer, Klimis, and Choi (1999)
- Krishnan and Sitaraman (2012)
L
L cont.
M
- Madden (2004)
- Max Planck Institute (2013)
- McRobbie, Strutt, Bandinelli and Springer (2016)
- Mustonen (2005)
N
O
P
S
T
U
V
W
Y
Z