Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Evidence Based Policies :
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) or
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
& Data industry :
Cultural education or
Film and motion pictures
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
Discipline:
Secondary Data Source:
Archival Research (2) ·
Case Study (13) ·
Document Research (11) ·
Ethnography (2) ·
Experimental (Field) (1) ·
Experimental (Laboratory) (1) ·
Experimental (Natural) (2) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Historical Methods (1) ·
Life History (1) ·
Longitudinal Study (6) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (36) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (11) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (47) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (31) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (15) ·
Structured Interview (3) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (23) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (38) ·
Unstructured Interview (3) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (15)
Cluster analysis (6) ·
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (2) ·
Correlation and Association (20) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (46) ·
Discourse Analysis (6) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (3) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Grounded Theory (4) ·
Legal Analysis (19) ·
Meta-Analysis (3) ·
Multivariate Statistics (12) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (32) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (19) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (49) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (29) ·
Regression Analysis (26) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (9) ·
Textual Content Analysis (26) ·
Triangulation (1) ·
Visual / Other Content Analysis (1)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (72) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (15) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (15) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (58) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (54)
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Showing below up to 114 results in range #1 to #114.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Akmon (2010)
- Astle and Muir (2002)
- Aufderheide and Sinnreich (2015)
- Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)
B
- Baghestan et al. (2019)
- Band (2013a)
- Band (2013b)
- Batikas, Claussen and Peukert (2019)
- Belleflamme and Peitz (2010)
- Belleflamme and Peitz (2014)
- Bellégo and Nijs (2020)
- Borghi, Maggiolino, Montagnani and Nuccio (2012)
- Bounie, Bourreau and Waelbroeck (2006)
C
- Camerani, Grassano, Chavarro and Tang (2013)
- Cameron (1988)
- Cameron and Bazelon (2013)
- Campagnolo et al. (2018)
- Cave, Deegan and Heinink (2000)
- Cenite, Wang, Peiwen and Chan (2009)
- Charles River Associates (2014)
- Cockrill and Goode (2012)
- Corbett (2011)
- Corporate Europe Observatory (2018)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
- Creative Content Australia (2015)
- Cuntz and Bergquist (2020)
D
- Danaher and Waldfogel (2012)
- Darling (2014)
- De Beer and Bouchard (2010)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014b)
- Dickson (2010)
- Dryden (2008)
E
F
G
- Garcia-Bardidia, Nau and Remy (2011)
- GfK Belgium (2015)
- Goodridge, Haskel and Mitra-Kahn (2012)
- Guadamuz and Cabell (2014)
- Guibault, Salamanca and van Gompel (2015)
- Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)
H
- Haefliger, Jäger and Von Krogh (2010)
- Handke, Girard and Mattes (2015)
- Haveman and Kluttz (2014)
- Heimstädt, Saunderson and Heath (2014)
- Hennig-Thurau, Henning and Sattler (2007)
- Herz and Kiljański (2016)
- Hill (2013)
- Hirsch (1972)
- Hong (2007)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012a)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012b)
- Hudson and Kenyon (2007)
- Huygen, Helberger, Poort, Rutten and Van Eijk (2009)
K
- Karaganis and Urban (2015)
- Korn (2009)
- Kretschmer, Klimis, and Choi (1999)
- Krishnan and Sitaraman (2012)
- Kuchma (2011)
L
M
- Mateus and Peha (2008)
- Max Planck Institute (2013)
- McCalman (2004)
- McCalman (2005)
- Monroy Rodríguez (2009)
- Moreno and Sepúlveda (2021)
- Morrison and Secker (2015)
- Mortimer (2007)
O
P
P cont.
- Papies and Clement (2008)
- Pascault et al. (2020)
- Perzanowski and Hoofnagle (2017)
- Peukert, Claussen and Kretschmer (2015)
- Picard, Toivonen and Grönlund (2003)
- Png and Wang (2006)
- Poort and Leenheer (2012)
- Poort et al (2018)
- PricewaterhouseCoopers (2016)
- Pénard, Dejean and Suire (2011)
R
S
- Sag (2014)
- Secker, Gadd and Morrison (2019)
- Seng (2015)
- Shmatkov (2020)
- Silbey (2014a)
- Sinnreich et al. (2020)
- Siwek (2009)
- Smith and Telang (2010)
- Smith and Telang (2012)
- Stratton (2011)
T
V
W
- Waelde and MacQueen (2004)
- Waldfogel (2017)
- Watt (2009)
- What the Online Piracy Data Tells Us About Copyright Policymaking
- World Intellectual Property Organization (2014)
X
Y
Z