Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data analysis method:
Legal Analysis 
& Evidence Based Policies :
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) or
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)
& Evidence Based Policies :
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) or
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
CJEU website (1) ·
CLA datasets (1) ·
CNC (1) ·
CPA (2002) (1) ·
Case law (3) ·
Center for Research in Security Prices (1) ·
Clarivate Web of Science (1) ·
Collecting societies (1) ·
Copyright Levies Reform Alliance (1) ·
Data.gov.uk (1) ·
ECJ (1) ·
European Commission (1) ·
German Legal Database "beck-online" (1) ·
Google Scholar (1) ·
Infosoc Directive (2) ·
Internet Archive Wayback Machine (1) ·
Legislative review (1) ·
Literature review (1) ·
Miller, P (2012) Thinking about Open Data, With a Little Help from the Data Hub. Cloud of Data (1) ·
Music Publishers Association (2014) (1) ·
Médiamétrie (1) ·
NACE classification (1) ·
National studies (1) ·
Nokia (1) ·
PRODCOM (1) ·
PRS for Music (1) ·
Rentrak (1) ·
Revenue data (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (3) ·
SHERPA institutional repository list (1) ·
ScreenDaily.com (1) ·
The Directory of Open Access Repositories (1) ·
The United States Supreme Court Judicial Database (1) ·
US Federal Court Decisions (1) ·
Various (1) ·
Westlaw (1) ·
While Scopus (1) ·
YOUNISON (1)
Data collection method:
Archival Research (2) ·
Case Study (21) ·
Document Research (30) ·
Experimental (Natural) (1) ·
Focus Groups (5) ·
Historical Methods (3) ·
Longitudinal Study (2) ·
Participant Observation (2) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (40) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (22) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (20) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (24) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (15) ·
Structured Interview (5) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (21) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (17) ·
Unstructured Interview (3) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (1)
Data analysis method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Arts and Humanities Research Council (2) ·
CREATe (1) ·
Centennial scholarships (1) ·
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (1) ·
Comissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board, Library of Congress (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) ·
European Commission (9) ·
European Parliament (1) ·
European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs (1) ·
Flemish Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology (1) ·
Golden Gate University School of Law (1) ·
Google (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (3) ·
International Postgraduate Research (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
None (1) ·
None stated (1) ·
Not stated (6) ·
Office of the United States Trade Representative (1) ·
PAI P4/04, Belgian State, Prime Minister’s Office, Science Policy Programming (1) ·
Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (grant PD/BD/105903/2014) (1) ·
SABIP (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
UNC Arts and Humanities Research Grant (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (3) ·
Western New England College School of Law (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (3) ·
de Thuiskopie (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (59) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (12) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (12) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (43) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (30)
Evidence Based Policies: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Data industry:
Advertising (3) ·
Architectural (4) ·
Computer consultancy (2) ·
Computer programming (4) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (27) ·
Cultural education (13) ·
Film and motion pictures (18) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (5) ·
PR and communication (1) ·
Photographic activities (7) ·
Programming and broadcasting (9) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (27) ·
Software publishing (19) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (32) ·
Specialised design (3) ·
Television programmes (19) ·
Translation and interpretation (1) ·
Video game publishing (2)
Showing below up to 81 results in range #1 to #81.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
- Bechtold (2013)
- Beebe (2008)
- Belleflamme and Peitz (2010)
- Bellégo and Nijs (2020)
- Bently et al. (2017)
- Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara and Marsden (2006b)
- Brooks (2005)
C
- Carpou (2016)
- Commission of the European Communities (2005b)
- Corbett (2011)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
- Coyle, Gould, Gupta and Gupta (2009)
D
- Danbury (2016)
- De Beer and Bouchard (2010)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014a)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014b)
- Depoorter (2019)
- Depoorter and Walker (2013)
- Depoorter, Van Hiel and Vanneste (2011)
- Dickson (2010)
- Doseva, Schmid-Petri, Schillmöller, Heckmann (2022)
- Dowthwaite et al (2016)
- Dryden (2008)
E
E cont.
F
- Favale (2020)
- Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013)
- Fietkiewicz (2020)
- Fromer and Lemley (2013)
G
- Gallagher (2012)
- Gasser (2004)
- Geradin (2005)
- Gerhardt (2011)
- Goel, Miesing and Chandra (2010)
- Gordon (1982)
- Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010)
- Grøndal (2006)
- Guadamuz and Cabell (2014)
- Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)
H
I
J
K
- Kheria (2012)
- Kheria (2013)
- Korn (2009)
- Kretschmer (2011)
- Kretschmer, Deazley, Edwards, Erickson, Schafer and Zizzo (2014)
L
L cont.
M
- Marsoof and Gupta (2019)
- Max Planck Institute (2013)
- Mendis, Secchi and Reeves (2015)
- Morrison and Secker (2017)
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
- United States Copyright Office (2013b)
- United States Copyright Office (2015a)
- United States Copyright Office (2015b)
V
W
X
