Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method:
Qualitative content/text mining
& Government or policy study:
Yes
& Evidence Based Policies:
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) (1) ·
Barker (2013b) (1) ·
Bolye (2008) (1) ·
Deazley (2006) (1) ·
EIFL (2013) (1) ·
Ginsburg (2010) (1) ·
Handke and Towse (2007) (1) ·
Hargreaves (2011) (3) ·
Hess and Ostrom (2003) (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (2015a) (1) ·
Liebowitz and Watt (2006) (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015) (1) ·
Ricketson (2003) (1) ·
Rogers and Szamosszegi (2010) (1) ·
Stobo, Deazley and Anderson (2013) (1) ·
Vuopala (2010) (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (5) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (1) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (4)
Creative, arts and entertainment (5) ·
Cultural education (2) ·
Film and motion pictures (2) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (2) ·
Photographic activities (1) ·
Programming and broadcasting (1) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (3) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (2)
Showing below up to 5 results in range #1 to #5.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)