Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method:
Quantitative data/text mining
& Government or policy study:
Yes
& Evidence Based Policies :
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) or
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) (1) ·
Barker (2013b) (1) ·
EIFL (2013) (1) ·
Handke and Towse (2007) (1) ·
Hargreaves (2011) (2) ·
Liebowitz and Watt (2006) (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015) (1) ·
Rogers and Szamosszegi (2010) (1) ·
Stobo, Deazley and Anderson (2013) (1) ·
Vuopala (2010) (1)
Australia (1) ·
Austria (1) ·
Belgium (1) ·
Burkina Faso (1) ·
Canada (2) ·
Caribbean Netherlands (1) ·
Croatia (1) ·
Czech Republic (1) ·
Denmark (1) ·
Estonia (1) ·
European Union (1) ·
Finland (1) ·
France (1) ·
Germany (1) ·
Greece (1) ·
Hungary (1) ·
Italy (1) ·
Japan (1) ·
Latvia (1) ·
Lithuania (1) ·
Norway (1) ·
Paraguay (1) ·
Poland (1) ·
Portugal (1) ·
Russian Federation (1) ·
Singapore (1) ·
Slovakia (1) ·
Slovenia (1) ·
Sweden (1) ·
Switzerland (1) ·
Turkey (1) ·
Ukraine (1) ·
United Kingdom (2) ·
United States (2)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (4) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (1) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (3)
Showing below up to 4 results in range #1 to #4.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)