Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (894)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year: (Click arrow to add another value)
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method:
Archival Research (3) ·
Case Study (9) ·
Document Research (11) ·
Experimental (Field) (1) ·
Experimental (Laboratory) (2) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Longitudinal Study (2) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (15) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (6) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (25) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (15) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (10) ·
Snowball sampling (1) ·
Structured Interview (2) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (11) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (21) ·
Unstructured Interview (3) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (5)
Data analysis method:
Correlation and Association (6) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (19) ·
Discourse Analysis (3) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (2) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Legal Analysis (11) ·
Meta-Analysis (3) ·
Multivariate Statistics (4) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (12) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (9) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (27) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (13) ·
Regression Analysis (11) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (2) ·
Textual Content Analysis (12)
Country:
Australia (3) ·
Canada (2) ·
China (1) ·
Europe (1) ·
European Union (12) ·
France (2) ·
Germany (1) ·
Global (5) ·
Hungary (2) ·
India (1) ·
Ireland (1) ·
Israel (1) ·
Japan (2) ·
Norway (1) ·
OECD (1) ·
Poland (1) ·
Singapore (1) ·
Spain (1) ·
Sweden (1) ·
Switzerland (1) ·
The Netherlands (1) ·
United Kingdom (9) ·
United States (30) ·
Unknown (1)
Time period of data collection:
1929 - 2010 (1) ·
1960-1985 (1) ·
1985-2000 (1) ·
1999-2010 (1) ·
2003-2013 (1) ·
2004 to 2014 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2005-2012 (1) ·
2006 (1) ·
2006 to 2011 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2012 (1) ·
2012-2013 (2) ·
2013 (3) ·
2013-2014 (2) ·
2014 (10) ·
5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
April 2012 – February 2013 (1) ·
First week of every month from 1985 - 2013 (1) ·
From 1 April 2014 to 30 April 2014 (1) ·
July 2012 (1) ·
March 2 to May 31, 2009 (1) ·
May 2012 – February 2013 (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Not specified (1) ·
Not stated (7) ·
Not stated. The study focuses, with a few exceptions, on the literature of the last decade. (1) ·
September 2010 – September 2012 (1) ·
Summer 2013 (1) ·
Unstated. (1)
Funder:
CAIW (1) ·
CREATe (1) ·
DELTA (1) ·
European Commision (1) ·
European Commission (6) ·
European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (1) ·
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 611988 (1) ·
Google (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (2) ·
KPN (1) ·
Motion Picture Association of America (1) ·
None (1) ·
Not Stated (1) ·
Not stated (5) ·
OpenDataMonitor Project (1) ·
Research Councils UK (1) ·
SOS Internet (1) ·
The Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 23243042, 24730212. (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1) ·
XS4ALL (1) ·
Ziggo (1) ·
the Royal Dutch Book Trade Association (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (38) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (15) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (5) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (25) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (19)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (22) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (11) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (26) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (10) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (23)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Academic article (1) ·
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Authorities (1) ·
Case study (2) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Copyright Law Suits (1) ·
Copyright cases filed in US District Courts (1) ·
Country (3) ·
Creative industries (1) ·
Creators (2) ·
DVD sales (1) ·
Experts (1) ·
Individual (9) ·
Individual data (1) ·
Internet Platforms (1) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Legal experts (1) ·
Magazines (1) ·
Music services (1) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Organisations (1) ·
Out-of-print books (1) ·
PSI re-users (1) ·
Preregistrations (1) ·
Price units (1) ·
Publication (1) ·
Songs (1) ·
Studies (1) ·
Takedown notices (1) ·
Takedown requests (1) ·
US Copyright Office Registrations (1) ·
University students (1) ·
Work made for hire cases (1) ·
book titles (1) ·
economic models (1) ·
judicial opinion (1) ·
songs (1)
Data material year:
1741-1860 (1) ·
1930-2009 (1) ·
1985-2013 (1) ·
1989-2014 (1) ·
2001-2012 (1) ·
2001-2014 (1) ·
2003-2013 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2005-2012 (1) ·
2006 to 2011 (1) ·
2008-2012 (1) ·
2009 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2011-2012 (1) ·
2012 (2) ·
2012-2013 (1) ·
2013 (5) ·
2014 (9) ·
5 December 2013 - 5 March 2014 (1) ·
January 2012 - April 2012 (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Not stated (4) ·
The empirical dataset consists of 446 federal copyright publication opinions decided before 2011. (1)
Data industry:
Advertising (2) ·
Architectural (1) ·
Computer consultancy (2) ·
Computer programming (5) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (18) ·
Cultural education (7) ·
Film and motion pictures (24) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (2) ·
PR and communication (1) ·
Photographic activities (3) ·
Programming and broadcasting (5) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (20) ·
Software publishing (17) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (25) ·
Specialised design (2) ·
Television programmes (17)
Showing below up to 58 results in range #1 to #58.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Aguiar and Waldfogel (2014)
- Arai and Kinukawa (2014)
- Arnold, Darmon, Dejean and Penard (2014)
- Asser Institute and IViR (2014)
B
- Balganesh, Manta and Wilkinson-Ryan (2014)
- Belleflamme and Peitz (2014)
- Buccafusco, Burns, Fromer and Sprigman (2014)
C
- Cantatore (2014)
- Charles River Associates (2014)
- Charness and Daniela (2014)
- Collopy, Bastian, Drye, Koempel, Lewis, Jenner (2014)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
D
- Darling (2014)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014a)
- De Wolf and Partners (2014b)
- Derclaye (2014)
- Dholakiya et al. (2014)
- DiCola and Touve (2014)
E
E cont.
F
G
H
- Hall, Helmers, Rogers, and Sena (2014)
- Haveman and Kluttz (2014)
- Heald (2014a)
- Heald (2014b)
- Heimstädt, Saunderson and Heath (2014)
I
K
L
M
M cont.
O
P
S
- Sag (2014)
- Sarid (2014)
- Seng (2014)
- Shaheed (2014)
- Silbey (2014a)
- Silbey (2014b)
- Sivan, Smith and Telang (2014)
- Soloveichik (2014)
T
V
W
