Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Year :
1970 or
1984 or
2016
& Government or policy study:
Yes
& Evidence Based Policies :
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) or
Other
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Danbury, R. (1) ·
European Commission (1) ·
European Union Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Guibault, L. (1) ·
Hester Wijminga (1) ·
IViR (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (2) ·
Joost Poort (1) ·
Kantar Media (1) ·
Marije van der Jagt (1) ·
Office of Harmonization in the Internal Market (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (1) ·
Salamanca, O. (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Wouter Klomp (1)
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) (1) ·
BASCAP (2011) (1) ·
Barker (2013b) (1) ·
Dusollier et al. (2014) (1) ·
European Economics and IViR (2015) (1) ·
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs (2015) (1) ·
IPO Online Copyright Infringement Tracker 1-5 (1) ·
OHIM (2013b) (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015) (1) ·
Rogers and Szamosszegi (2010) (1)
Case Study (2) ·
Document Research (1) ·
Focus Groups (2) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (5) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (2) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (4) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (4) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (3) ·
Structured Interview (1) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (3) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (6)
Correlation and Association (1) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (3) ·
Legal Analysis (4) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (4) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (4) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (3) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (4) ·
Regression Analysis (2) ·
Textual Content Analysis (2) ·
Visual / Other Content Analysis (1)
Australia (2) ·
Austria (1) ·
Belgium (2) ·
Burkina Faso (1) ·
Canada (2) ·
Caribbean Netherlands (1) ·
Croatia (1) ·
Czech Republic (1) ·
Denmark (3) ·
Estonia (1) ·
European Union (5) ·
Finland (2) ·
France (2) ·
Germany (3) ·
Greece (1) ·
Hungary (2) ·
Ireland (1) ·
Italy (2) ·
Japan (1) ·
Latvia (1) ·
Lithuania (1) ·
Norway (1) ·
Paraguay (1) ·
Poland (2) ·
Portugal (1) ·
Russian Federation (1) ·
Singapore (1) ·
Slovakia (1) ·
Slovenia (1) ·
Spain (2) ·
Sweden (1) ·
Switzerland (1) ·
The Netherlands (1) ·
Turkey (1) ·
Ukraine (1) ·
United Kingdom (6) ·
United States (3)
Arts and Humanities Research Council (1) ·
EU Commission’s Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (1) ·
European Commission (2) ·
Intellectual Property Office (3) ·
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal market (1) ·
This Report was prepared for APRA AMCOS, PPCA, Copyright Agency│Viscopy, Foxtel, News Corp Australia and Screenrights. (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1) ·
de Thuiskopie (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (7) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (1) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (5) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (6)
Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)