Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Year :
1998 or
2013
& Discipline:
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
& Comparative study:
Yes
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Australian Law Reform Commission (1) ·
Bechtold, S. (1) ·
Buccafusco, C. (1) ·
Dobusch, L. (1) ·
EIFL (1) ·
Erickson, K. (1) ·
Favale, M. (1) ·
Fromer, J. C. (1) ·
Hansen, D. R. (1) ·
Hinze, G. (1) ·
Homberg, F. (1) ·
Kantar (1) ·
Kretschmer, M. (2) ·
Latonero, M. (1) ·
Lemley, M. A. (1) ·
Masur, J. S. (1) ·
Max Planck Institute (1) ·
Mendis, D. (2) ·
Ofcom (1) ·
Public and Corporate Economic Consultants (1) ·
Quack, S. (1) ·
Secchi, D. (1) ·
Sinnreich, A. (1) ·
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2) ·
Urban, J. M. (1)
Alter and Meunier (2009) (1) ·
Aufderheide and Jaszi (2011) (1) ·
Beebe (2004) (1) ·
Beisner (2010) (1) ·
Büthe and Mattli (2011) (1) ·
Copyright Law Review Committee (2000) (1) ·
De Beer and Bouchard (2010) (1) ·
Deazley (2010) (1) ·
Economics and Statistics Administration (2012) (1) ·
Eisenberg (2004) (1) ·
Froschauer (2008) (1) ·
Gottlieb (2011) (1) ·
Gowers (2006) (2) ·
Graz and Nölke (2008) (1) ·
Handke (2011) (1) ·
Hargreaves (2011) (4) ·
Hargreaves (2012) (1) ·
Hobson and Seabrooke (2009) (1) ·
Hovenkamp (2012) (1) ·
Janis and Holbrook (2012) (1) ·
Landes and Posner (2003) (2) ·
Lemley (2004) (1) ·
Lund (2011) (1) ·
May and Sell (2006) (1) ·
McCarthy (2013) (1) ·
Nimmer (2013) (1) ·
Ofcom (2011) (1) ·
Perlmutter (1991-1992) (1) ·
Raustiala and Sprigman (2011) (1) ·
Raustiala and Sprigman (2013) (1) ·
Rogers, Tomalin and Corrigan (2009) (1) ·
Samuelson and Wheatland (2009) (1) ·
Singh and Kretschmer (2012) (1) ·
Stratton (2011) (1) ·
Towse (2011) (1) ·
US Register of Copyrights (2006) (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (1992) (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2015) (1)
Case Study (2) ·
Document Research (4) ·
Focus Groups (2) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (9) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (2) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (4) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (4) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (2) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (9) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (3) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (1)
Cluster analysis (2) ·
Correlation and Association (2) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (4) ·
Legal Analysis (9) ·
Multivariate Statistics (1) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (7) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (4) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (6) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (3) ·
Regression Analysis (1) ·
Textual Content Analysis (7)
Australia (4) ·
Canada (6) ·
Czech Republic (1) ·
Denmark (3) ·
European Union (5) ·
Finland (1) ·
France (1) ·
Germany (1) ·
Global (1) ·
Hungary (3) ·
Iceland (1) ·
India (4) ·
Japan (3) ·
Korea (1) ·
Mexico (1) ·
New Zealand (1) ·
Norway (1) ·
Philippines (1) ·
South Africa (1) ·
South Korea (1) ·
Sweden (1) ·
The Netherlands (1) ·
Turkey (1) ·
United Kingdom (7) ·
United States (10)
1998 to 2012 (1) ·
2004 to 2011 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2012-2013 (5) ·
2013 (2) ·
July 2006 and 2010 (1) ·
Non stated (1) ·
Non-stated (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
September to December 2012 (1) ·
The data cover the period May-October 2012, mainly by combining two waves of data: May-July and August-October 2012. (1)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
EIFL (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Ofcom (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (2) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (9) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (6) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (2) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (6) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (9)
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (2) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (5) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (5) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (5) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (1) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (6)
Cases (1) ·
Competition agencies (1) ·
Copyright enforcement systems (1) ·
Country (1) ·
Focus group (1) ·
IP rights (1) ·
IPR-intensive industries (1) ·
Individual (2) ·
Model for orphan works (1) ·
Organisations (1) ·
Provision (1) ·
Publications (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Stakeholders (3) ·
user-generated music video parodies (1)
Creative, arts and entertainment (8) ·
Film and motion pictures (5) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (2) ·
Photographic activities (1) ·
Programming and broadcasting (2) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (10) ·
Software publishing (7) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (8) ·
Television programmes (5)
Showing below up to 16 results in range #1 to #16.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
D
E
E cont.
F
H
M
O
P
S
U