Difference between revisions of "Banerjee, Banerjee and Raychaudhuri (2008)"
From Copyright EVIDENCE
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|Country=India; | |Country=India; | ||
|Cross-country=No | |Cross-country=No | ||
− | |Comparative= | + | |Comparative=Yes |
|Government or policy=No | |Government or policy=No | ||
|Literature review=No | |Literature review=No |
Revision as of 07:27, 8 April 2016
Contents
Source Details
Banerjee, Banerjee and Raychaudhuri (2008) | |
Title: | Optimal Enforcement and Anti-Copying Strategies to Counter Copyright Infringement |
Author(s): | Dyuti Banerjee, Tanmoyee Banerjee and Ajitava Raychaudhuri |
Year: | 2008 |
Citation: | Banerjee, Dyuti S., and Ajitava Raychaudhuri. OPTIMAL ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI‐COPYING STRATEGIES TO COUNTER COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Japanese Economic Review 59.4 (2008): 519-535. |
Link(s): | Definitive |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | |
Data Type: | |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | No |
Comparative Study?: | Yes |
Literature review?: | No |
Government or policy study?: | No |
Time Period(s) of Collection: | |
Funder(s): |
Abstract
In this paper we study the mix of anti-copying investment strategies by an incumbent firm and the enforcement policies of a government that consists of monitoring and penalizing the copier to address the issue of commercial piracy. If monitoring is socially optimal then the subgame perfect equilibrium anti-copying investment does not guarantee the prevention of copying. If not monitoring is socially optimal then the subgame perfect equilibrium anti-copying investment may guarantee the prevention of copying.
Main Results of the Study
Policy Implications as Stated By Author