Difference between revisions of "Copyright Evidence"

From Copyright EVIDENCE
Line 72: Line 72:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
|  {{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=A._Nature_and_Scope_of_exclusive_rights_%28hyperlinking%2Fbrowsing%3B_reproduction_right%29 | link text=A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (186)}} || This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the types of works that are eligible for copyright protection and the extent of the protection offered by exclusive rights and moral rights. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on the originality threshold, derivative works, hyperlinking, news aggregation, resale and community norms (including negative space).
+
|  {{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=A._Nature_and_Scope_of_exclusive_rights_%28hyperlinking%2Fbrowsing%3B_reproduction_right%29 | link text=A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (186)}}  
 +
|| This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the types of works that are eligible for copyright protection and the extent of the protection offered by exclusive rights and moral rights. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on the originality threshold, derivative works, hyperlinking, news aggregation, resale and community norms (including negative space).
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|
 
|
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=B._Exceptions_%28distinguish_innovation_and_public_policy_purposes%3B_open-ended%2Fclosed_list%3B_commercial%2Fnon-commercial_distinction%29 | link text=B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (120)}} || This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to whether materials which otherwise are subject to exclusive copyright protection should be available for justifiable use without seeking permission and whether existing exceptions and limitations facilitate creative and scientific progress. Among others, the papers included under this category distinguish exceptions and limitations for the purposes of innovation or public policy, open-ended provisions from closed lists, and commercial and non-commercial uses.
+
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=B._Exceptions_%28distinguish_innovation_and_public_policy_purposes%3B_open-ended%2Fclosed_list%3B_commercial%2Fnon-commercial_distinction%29 | link text=B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (120)}}  
 +
|| This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to whether materials which otherwise are subject to exclusive copyright protection should be available for justifiable use without seeking permission and whether existing exceptions and limitations facilitate creative and scientific progress. Among others, the papers included under this category distinguish exceptions and limitations for the purposes of innovation or public policy, open-ended provisions from closed lists, and commercial and non-commercial uses.
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|
 
|
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=C._Mass_digitisation%2Forphan_works_%28non-use%3B_extended_collective_licensing%29 | link text=C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (65)}} || This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the process that enable mass digitisation of copyright protected content. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on potential solutions for orphan works and non-use of cultural works, including licensing schemes and extended collective licensing, and the application of copyright in cultural heritage institutions.
+
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=C._Mass_digitisation%2Forphan_works_%28non-use%3B_extended_collective_licensing%29 | link text=C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (65)}}  
 +
|| This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the process that enable mass digitisation of copyright protected content. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on potential solutions for orphan works and non-use of cultural works, including licensing schemes and extended collective licensing, and the application of copyright in cultural heritage institutions.
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|
 
|
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=D._Licensing_and_Business_models_%28collecting_societies%3B_meta_data%3B_exchanges%2Fhubs%3B_windowing%3B_crossborder_availability%29 | link text=D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (238)}}
+
{{#drilldownlink:category=Studies|filters=Evidence_Based_Policies=D._Licensing_and_Business_models_%28collecting_societies%3B_meta_data%3B_exchanges%2Fhubs%3B_windowing%3B_crossborder_availability%29 | link text=D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (238)}}  
 +
||This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to strategies and licensing solutions in the exploitation of copyright protected materials, and how legal markets attempt to match production to consumption. Among others, the papers included under this category examine collecting societies, metadata, copyright exchanges and hubs, windowing, crossborder access, open access/open science and end-user licensing.
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|- style="text-align:left;"
 
|
 
|

Revision as of 15:30, 22 October 2019

Welcome to the Copyright Evidence Wiki
The open platform that collects evidence about copyright's role in society
909 studies have been fully catalogued

Introducing Copyright Evidence

Copyright Evidence is a digital resource developed by the CREATe Centre at the University of Glasgow. The aim of the Wiki is to construct a complete catalogue of existing empirical evidence relevant to copyright policy in order to inform public debate. The evidence is coded by many categories, including country, industry, funder and research method, offering an in-depth view of existing findings. The codes can be explored using the semantic drilldown function.

Editorial Board
Prof. Martin Kretschmer (chair), University of Glasgow
Assoc. Prof. Kristofer Erickson (co-chair), University of Leeds
Dr Kenneth Barr, University of Glasgow
Dr Heather Ford, University of Leeds
Assoc. Prof. Rebecca Giblin, Monash University
Prof. Paul Heald, University of Illinois
Dr Thomas Margoni, University of Glasgow
Dr Theo Koutmeridis University of Glasgow
Assoc. Prof. Joost Poort, University of Amsterdam
Fred Saunderson, National Library of Scotland
Prof. Ruth Towse, Bournemouth University & CREATe
Amy Thomas (sub-editor), University of Glasgow

More information can be found on the About page and in the FAQs.

Browse by Industry:
Book on.png Books Broadcasting on.png Broadcasting Education on.png Education Film on.png Films

Blue square.png All industries

Music on.png Music Photography on.png Photography Software on.png Software Television on.png Television
Browse by year:

1970, 1972, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019

Browse by policy issue:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (186) This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the types of works that are eligible for copyright protection and the extent of the protection offered by exclusive rights and moral rights. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on the originality threshold, derivative works, hyperlinking, news aggregation, resale and community norms (including negative space).

B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (120)

This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to whether materials which otherwise are subject to exclusive copyright protection should be available for justifiable use without seeking permission and whether existing exceptions and limitations facilitate creative and scientific progress. Among others, the papers included under this category distinguish exceptions and limitations for the purposes of innovation or public policy, open-ended provisions from closed lists, and commercial and non-commercial uses.

C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (65)

This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to the process that enable mass digitisation of copyright protected content. Among others, the papers included under this category focus on potential solutions for orphan works and non-use of cultural works, including licensing schemes and extended collective licensing, and the application of copyright in cultural heritage institutions.

D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (238)

This field includes papers that examine policy issues related to strategies and licensing solutions in the exploitation of copyright protected materials, and how legal markets attempt to match production to consumption. Among others, the papers included under this category examine collecting societies, metadata, copyright exchanges and hubs, windowing, crossborder access, open access/open science and end-user licensing.

E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (105)

F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (404)

[View more browsing options]
Propose a Study User Guide