Difference between revisions of "Danahar, Smith and Teland (2015)"
(Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MainSource | {{MainSource | ||
|Source={{Source | |Source={{Source | ||
− | |Name of Study= | + | |Name of Study=World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) |
|Author=Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R. | |Author=Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R. | ||
|Title='Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Emprical Evidence and Conclusions’ | |Title='Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Emprical Evidence and Conclusions’ | ||
|Year=2015 | |Year=2015 | ||
− | |Cross-country= | + | |Full Citation=Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R.,'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence and Conclusions', WIPO/ACE/10/20, 2015 |
− | |Comparative= | + | |Abstract=The digitization of media goods weakened the effective strength of copyright policy by allowing widespread sharing of media files over the Internet, forcing governments to consider how to reform copyright policy to reflect the digital era and forcing firms to consider new strategies in order to compete with online piracy. This paper reviews the economic evidence on the effectiveness of various government antipiracy interventions as well as firm strategies aimed at mitigating piracy’s impact. By synthesizing the results of various studies, we provide insights on the principles that drive the degree of success or failure of various antipiracy policies. This study should be of value to policymakers and rightsholders considering copyright reform initiatives, and also to researchers looking for guidance toward what questions remain important but unanswered by current academic literature. |
− | |Government or policy= | + | |Link=http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/enforcement/en/wipo_ace_10/wipo_ace_10_20.pdf |
− | |Literature review= | + | |FundamentalIssue=5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media), 1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare, |
+ | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness), | ||
+ | |Discipline=O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights, O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes, O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital, O38: Government Policy | ||
+ | |Data Type=Secondary data | ||
+ | |Industry=Film and motion pictures; Television programmes; Sound recording and music publishing; Software publishing (including video games); | ||
+ | |Cross-country=Yes | ||
+ | |Comparative=Yes | ||
+ | |Government or policy=Yes | ||
+ | |Literature review=Yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
|Dataset= | |Dataset= | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:01, 12 March 2016
Contents
Source Details
World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) | |
Title: | 'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Emprical Evidence and Conclusions’ |
Author(s): | Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R. |
Year: | 2015 |
Citation: | Danahar, B., Smith, M., Teland, R.,'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence and Conclusions', WIPO/ACE/10/20, 2015 |
Link(s): | , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | |
Data Type: | Secondary data |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | Yes |
Comparative Study?: | Yes |
Literature review?: | Yes |
Government or policy study?: | Yes |
Time Period(s) of Collection: | |
Funder(s): |
Abstract
The digitization of media goods weakened the effective strength of copyright policy by allowing widespread sharing of media files over the Internet, forcing governments to consider how to reform copyright policy to reflect the digital era and forcing firms to consider new strategies in order to compete with online piracy. This paper reviews the economic evidence on the effectiveness of various government antipiracy interventions as well as firm strategies aimed at mitigating piracy’s impact. By synthesizing the results of various studies, we provide insights on the principles that drive the degree of success or failure of various antipiracy policies. This study should be of value to policymakers and rightsholders considering copyright reform initiatives, and also to researchers looking for guidance toward what questions remain important but unanswered by current academic literature.
Main Results of the Study
Policy Implications as Stated By Author