Difference between revisions of "European Commission (2013)"
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
PeteBennett (talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Source={{Source | |Source={{Source | ||
|Name of Study=European Commission (2013) | |Name of Study=European Commission (2013) | ||
− | |Author=European Commission | + | |Author=European Commission |
|Title=Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures | |Title=Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Authentic Link=http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf | |Authentic Link=http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf | ||
|Link=http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf | |Link=http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf | ||
− | |Reference=Cook (2014); Hargreaves (2011); Liebowitz (2014); | + | |Reference=Cook (2014);Hargreaves (2011);Liebowitz (2014); |
|Plain Text Proposition=This study provides a synthesis of the responses to an online survey about the civil enforcement of copyright and other intellectual property rights within the European Union. About half of the respondents identified themselves as rights holders. The survey did not test a particular proposition, but was designed to provide information for a future Communication from the European Union on Intellectual Property enforcement. | |Plain Text Proposition=This study provides a synthesis of the responses to an online survey about the civil enforcement of copyright and other intellectual property rights within the European Union. About half of the respondents identified themselves as rights holders. The survey did not test a particular proposition, but was designed to provide information for a future Communication from the European Union on Intellectual Property enforcement. | ||
− | |FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare, 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?, 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) | + | |FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare,2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?,5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) |
− | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness), D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability), A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) | + | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness),D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability),A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) |
|Discipline=K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law, O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital, O38: Government Policy | |Discipline=K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law, O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital, O38: Government Policy | ||
|Intervention-Response=No policy implications are made in this report. | |Intervention-Response=No policy implications are made in this report. | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|Method of Collection=Quantitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting), Quantitative data/text mining, Qualitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences), Qualitative content/text mining | |Method of Collection=Quantitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting), Quantitative data/text mining, Qualitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences), Qualitative content/text mining | ||
|Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining), Qualitative Analysis Methods, Textual Content Analysis | |Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining), Qualitative Analysis Methods, Textual Content Analysis | ||
− | + | |Country=European Union | |
− | |Country=European Union | ||
|Cross-country=Yes | |Cross-country=Yes | ||
|Comparative=No | |Comparative=No | ||
Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
|Dataset={{Dataset | |Dataset={{Dataset | ||
|Sample Size=300 | |Sample Size=300 | ||
− | |Level of Aggregation=Individual Responses | + | |Level of Aggregation=Individual Responses |
|Data Material Year=2012 to 2013 | |Data Material Year=2012 to 2013 | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 19:47, 21 November 2020
Contents
Source Details
European Commission (2013) | |
Title: | Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures |
Author(s): | European Commission |
Year: | 2013 |
Citation: | European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: | Erickson (2014) |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | An online survey was made available to Member States in multiple languages. 282 responses were received and several more accepted by post after the deadline. Some of the contributors contributed more than once. The purpose was to collect statistical data and qualitative information on experience. |
Data Type: | Primary data |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | Yes |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | No |
Government or policy study?: | Yes |
Time Period(s) of Collection: |
|
Funder(s): |
|
Abstract
An online public consultation on the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures for the civil enforcement of intellectual property rights was launched on 30 November 2012 and closed on 30 March 2013. The questionnaire was made available in English, German and French but responses were accepted in all official languages of the Union. This survey was part of a more general consultation process that has lasted for over two years and from which conclusions will be drawn in a future Communication from the Commission.
Main Results of the Study
This study provides a synthesis of the responses to an online survey about the civil enforcement of copyright and other intellectual property rights within the European Union. About half of the respondents identified themselves as rights holders. The survey did not test a particular proposition, but was designed to provide information for a future Communication from the European Union on Intellectual Property enforcement.
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
No policy implications are made in this report.
Coverage of Study
Datasets
Sample size: | 300 |
Level of aggregation: | Individual Responses |
Period of material under study: | 2012 to 2013 |