Difference between revisions of "Frosio (2014)"
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Source={{Source | |Source={{Source | ||
|Name of Study=Frosio (2014) | |Name of Study=Frosio (2014) | ||
− | |Author=Frosio, G. | + | |Author=Frosio, G. F. ; Derclaye, E.; |
|Title=Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review | |Title=Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
|Full Citation=Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014). | |Full Citation=Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014). | ||
− | |Abstract=Within the context of the Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) research scope, this literature review investigates the current trends, advantages, disadvantages, problems and solutions, opportunities and barriers in Open Access Publishing (OAP), and in particular Open Access (OA) academic publishing. This study is intended to scope and evaluate current theory and practice concerning models for OAP and engage with intellectual, legal and economic perspectives on OAP. It is also aimed at mapping the field of academic publishing in the UK and abroad, drawing specifically upon the experiences of CREATe industry partners as well as other initiatives such as SSRN, open source software, and Creative Commons. As a final critical goal, this scoping study will identify any meaningful gaps in the relevant literature with a view to developing further research questions. The results of this scoping exercise will then be presented to relevant | + | |Abstract=Within the context of the Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) research scope, this literature review investigates the current trends, advantages, disadvantages, problems and solutions, opportunities and barriers in Open Access Publishing (OAP), and in particular Open Access (OA) academic publishing. This study is intended to scope and evaluate current theory and practice concerning models for OAP and engage with intellectual, legal and economic perspectives on OAP. It is also aimed at mapping the field of academic publishing in the UK and abroad, drawing specifically upon the experiences of CREATe industry partners as well as other initiatives such as SSRN, open source software, and Creative Commons. As a final critical goal, this scoping study will identify any meaningful gaps in the relevant literature with a view to developing further research questions. The results of this scoping exercise will then be presented to relevant industry and academic partners at a workshop intended to assist in further developing the critical research questions pertinent to OAP. |
− | industry and academic partners at a workshop intended to assist in further developing the critical research questions pertinent to OAP. | + | |Authentic Link=http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CREATe-Working-Paper-2014-01.pdf |
|Link=http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CREATe-Working-Paper-2014-01.pdf | |Link=http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CREATe-Working-Paper-2014-01.pdf | ||
− | |Reference=Willinsky (2006 | + | |Reference=Willinsky (2006);Boulton et al. (2012);Reichmann and Okediji (2012);Bjork (2004); |
− | |Plain Text Proposition=* The current economic crisis in academic publishing, caused by the increase in price of academic journals, has led to the increasing use of new and more open models of publishing, and the de-commodification of academic publishing. | + | |Plain Text Proposition=* The current economic crisis in academic publishing, caused by the increase in price of academic journals, has led to the increasing use of new and more open models of publishing, and the de-commodification of academic publishing. * Open Access and Open Access Publishing have the potential to relieve, at least in part, both these aspects of the unresolved and recently heightened tension between access and protection. * Copyright protects the rights of the publisher and is not predominately a factor in the motivation of the author of published research. Motivation will principally be reputation based.* Universities and government research bodies are increasingly moving to an Open Access Mandate for published research. This should eventually lead to an environment where the predominate model is Open Access. In order to make sure that similar problems of economic imbalance between authors and publishers arise in the future, policy makers should carefully assess the Green and Gold models to ensure continued academic freedom and equitable access |
− | * Open Access and Open Access Publishing have the potential to relieve, at least in part, both these aspects of the unresolved and recently heightened tension between access and protection. | + | |FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare,3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors),4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) |
− | * Copyright protects the rights of the publisher and is not predominately a factor in the motivation of the author of published research. Motivation will principally be reputation based. | + | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right),D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability),E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) |
− | * Universities and government research bodies are increasingly moving to an Open Access Mandate for published research. This should eventually lead to an environment where the predominate model is Open Access. In order to make sure that similar problems of economic imbalance between authors and publishers arise in the future, policy makers should carefully assess the Green and Gold models to ensure continued academic freedom and equitable access | + | |Discipline=L17: Open Source Products and Markets, O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
− | |FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare, 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors), 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) | ||
− | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right), D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability), E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) | ||
− | |Discipline= | ||
|Intervention-Response=Open Access Mandates are increasingly adopted by universities and research bodies producing research studies. In order to ensure academic freedom is maintained, careful analysis is needed of the Green and Gold models of Open Access. | |Intervention-Response=Open Access Mandates are increasingly adopted by universities and research bodies producing research studies. In order to ensure academic freedom is maintained, careful analysis is needed of the Green and Gold models of Open Access. | ||
− | |Description of Data= | + | |Description of Data=This study is intended to scope and evaluate current theory and practice concerning models for Open Access Publishing and engage with intellectual, legal and economic perspectives on OAP. |
|Data Year=2004 to 2014 | |Data Year=2004 to 2014 | ||
|Data Type=Secondary data | |Data Type=Secondary data | ||
Line 24: | Line 21: | ||
|Method of Collection=Quantitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting), Quantitative data/text mining, Qualitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences), Case Study, Semi-Structured Interview, Archival Research | |Method of Collection=Quantitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting), Quantitative data/text mining, Qualitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences), Case Study, Semi-Structured Interview, Archival Research | ||
|Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Correlation and Association | |Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Correlation and Association | ||
− | |Industry= | + | |Industry=Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing; |
− | |Country=European Union | + | |Country=United States;European Union |
− | |Cross-country= | + | |Cross-country=Yes |
|Comparative=No | |Comparative=No | ||
− | |Government or policy= | + | |Government or policy=No |
|Literature review=Yes | |Literature review=Yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
|Dataset={{Dataset | |Dataset={{Dataset | ||
− | |Sample Size= | + | |Sample Size=1 |
− | |Level of Aggregation= | + | |Level of Aggregation=Case study |
− | |Data Material Year= | + | |Data Material Year=2014 |
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 07:52, 4 June 2020
Contents
Source Details
Frosio (2014) | |
Title: | Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review |
Author(s): | Frosio, G. F., Derclaye, E. |
Year: | 2014 |
Citation: | Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014). |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | This study is intended to scope and evaluate current theory and practice concerning models for Open Access Publishing and engage with intellectual, legal and economic perspectives on OAP. |
Data Type: | Secondary data |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | Yes |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | Yes |
Government or policy study?: | No |
Time Period(s) of Collection: |
|
Funder(s): |
Abstract
Within the context of the Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy (CREATe) research scope, this literature review investigates the current trends, advantages, disadvantages, problems and solutions, opportunities and barriers in Open Access Publishing (OAP), and in particular Open Access (OA) academic publishing. This study is intended to scope and evaluate current theory and practice concerning models for OAP and engage with intellectual, legal and economic perspectives on OAP. It is also aimed at mapping the field of academic publishing in the UK and abroad, drawing specifically upon the experiences of CREATe industry partners as well as other initiatives such as SSRN, open source software, and Creative Commons. As a final critical goal, this scoping study will identify any meaningful gaps in the relevant literature with a view to developing further research questions. The results of this scoping exercise will then be presented to relevant industry and academic partners at a workshop intended to assist in further developing the critical research questions pertinent to OAP.
Main Results of the Study
- The current economic crisis in academic publishing, caused by the increase in price of academic journals, has led to the increasing use of new and more open models of publishing, and the de-commodification of academic publishing. * Open Access and Open Access Publishing have the potential to relieve, at least in part, both these aspects of the unresolved and recently heightened tension between access and protection. * Copyright protects the rights of the publisher and is not predominately a factor in the motivation of the author of published research. Motivation will principally be reputation based.* Universities and government research bodies are increasingly moving to an Open Access Mandate for published research. This should eventually lead to an environment where the predominate model is Open Access. In order to make sure that similar problems of economic imbalance between authors and publishers arise in the future, policy makers should carefully assess the Green and Gold models to ensure continued academic freedom and equitable access
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
Open Access Mandates are increasingly adopted by universities and research bodies producing research studies. In order to ensure academic freedom is maintained, careful analysis is needed of the Green and Gold models of Open Access.
Coverage of Study
Datasets
Sample size: | 1 |
Level of aggregation: | Case study |
Period of material under study: | 2014 |