Difference between revisions of "Joseph (2019)"
(Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MainSource | {{MainSource | ||
|Source={{Source | |Source={{Source | ||
− | |Name of Study=Joseph, M. (2019). Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent. In Victorian Literary Businesses (pp. 83-116). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. | + | |Name of Study=Joseph (2019) |
+ | |Author=Joseph, M. | ||
+ | |Title=Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent | ||
+ | |Year=2019 | ||
+ | |Full Citation=Joseph, M. (2019). Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent. In Victorian Literary Businesses (pp. 83-116). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. | ||
+ | |Abstract=The rise of the literary agent has been widely chronicled in research. However, studies concentrate on what literary agents did once they were established, but ignore how this literary business developed, and why it changed the dynamic of how literature was sold between the author and publisher. The study fills this gap by exploring Alexander Pollock Watt (A. P. Watt), one of Britain’s earliest literary agents. The author answers several questions: (1) Origins of a literary middleman; (2) Why did the literary agent emerge? (3) How did A. P. Watt become the most notable Victorian agent; and (4) How did A. P. Watt develop the professionalisation of the literary agency. At the end, the author also describes how A. P. Watt, through The Bookman interview, strategically delivered a self-image which is inconsistent with documents in the archive. The author points out it is problematic that researchers consider the narrative of The Bookman interview as fact without questioning. | ||
+ | |Authentic Link=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-28592-0_4 | ||
+ | |Link=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-28592-0_4 | ||
+ | |Reference=Heinemann (1893);Gillies (2007);Hepburn(1968) | ||
+ | |Plain Text Proposition=The literary agent in a relatively short span of time became an instrumental part of publishing, progressing from being an outsider and in some cases despised by publishers, to becoming a gatekeeper, as all communications, agreements and negotiations went through the office of the agent. Although not the first, it can be argued that A. P. Watt was the most influential due to how he professionalised the service utilising contractual law, so he could negotiate with publishers effectively and ensure that agreements would be legally binding. The Bookman interview was Watt’s opportunity to portray himself to the public as a confident businessman who had created a role within the industry that was regarded as a vital service to authors and publishers. However, this interview has highlighted how important it is for researchers to be critical of their sources, as numerous researchers have relied upon this article drawing on the narrative as fact without question, leading to misconceptions. | ||
+ | |FundamentalIssue=3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors),4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) | ||
+ | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) | ||
+ | |Discipline=N: Economic History, N7: Transport; Trade; Energy; Technology; and Other Services, N73: Europe: Pre-1913, O: Economic Development; Technological Change; and Growth, O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights, O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital | ||
+ | |Industry=Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing | ||
+ | |Country=UK | ||
|Cross-country=No | |Cross-country=No | ||
|Comparative=No | |Comparative=No |
Revision as of 17:16, 18 December 2020
Contents
Source Details
Joseph (2019) | |
Title: | Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent |
Author(s): | Joseph, M. |
Year: | 2019 |
Citation: | Joseph, M. (2019). Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent. In Victorian Literary Businesses (pp. 83-116). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | |
Data Type: | |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | No |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | No |
Government or policy study?: | No |
Time Period(s) of Collection: | |
Funder(s): |
Abstract
The rise of the literary agent has been widely chronicled in research. However, studies concentrate on what literary agents did once they were established, but ignore how this literary business developed, and why it changed the dynamic of how literature was sold between the author and publisher. The study fills this gap by exploring Alexander Pollock Watt (A. P. Watt), one of Britain’s earliest literary agents. The author answers several questions: (1) Origins of a literary middleman; (2) Why did the literary agent emerge? (3) How did A. P. Watt become the most notable Victorian agent; and (4) How did A. P. Watt develop the professionalisation of the literary agency. At the end, the author also describes how A. P. Watt, through The Bookman interview, strategically delivered a self-image which is inconsistent with documents in the archive. The author points out it is problematic that researchers consider the narrative of The Bookman interview as fact without questioning.
Main Results of the Study
The literary agent in a relatively short span of time became an instrumental part of publishing, progressing from being an outsider and in some cases despised by publishers, to becoming a gatekeeper, as all communications, agreements and negotiations went through the office of the agent. Although not the first, it can be argued that A. P. Watt was the most influential due to how he professionalised the service utilising contractual law, so he could negotiate with publishers effectively and ensure that agreements would be legally binding. The Bookman interview was Watt’s opportunity to portray himself to the public as a confident businessman who had created a role within the industry that was regarded as a vital service to authors and publishers. However, this interview has highlighted how important it is for researchers to be critical of their sources, as numerous researchers have relied upon this article drawing on the narrative as fact without question, leading to misconceptions.
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
Coverage of Study
Datasets
{{{Dataset}}}