Property:Has full citation

From Copyright EVIDENCE

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 500 pages using this property.
A
Acılar, A. (2010). Demographic Factors Affecting Freshman Students' Attitudes towards Software Piracy: An Empirical Study. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 7, 321-328.  +
Acilar, A., & Aydemir, M. (2010). Students' Attitudes Towards Software Piracy-The Gender Factor: A Case of a Public University in an Emerging Country. In The Eleventh ETHICOMP International Conference on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Information and Communication Technology.  +
Adermon, Adrian, Che-Yuan Liang. 2014. Piracy and Music Sales: The Effects of an Anti-Piracy Law. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 105, 90-106.  +
Adum, A.N., Ekwenchi, O., Odogwu, E., and Umeh, K. (2019) Awareness of Copyright Laws among Select Nigerian University Students. 86 Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 183  +
Aguiar, L., & Martens, B. (2013). Digital music consumption on the internet: Evidence from clickstream data. Working Paper No. JRC79605. Available at SSRN 2265299  +
Aguiar, Luis, and Joel Waldfogel. Digitization, Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade. Copyright, and the Welfare Effects of Music Trade (December 3, 2014) (2014).  +
Aguiar, L., Claussen, J. And Peukert, C. (2018) Catch Me if You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement. Information Systems Research, 29(3), pp 656-678  +
Aguilar, A. (2017) Distributed Ownership in Music: Between Authorship and Performance. Social & Legal Studies, 27(6), pp776-798  +
Aguilar, A. (2019) We want Artists to be Fully and Fairly Paid for their Work’: Discourses on Fairness in the Neoliberal European Copyright Reform. JIPITEC 9 (2)  +
Aguilar, A. (2019) The collective management of performers’ rights in the UK: a story of competing interests. Scripted 16(1) DOI: 10.2966/scrip.160119.4  +
Ahlert, C., Marsden, C., & Yung, C. (2004). How ‘Liberty’ Disappeared from Cyberspace: The Mystery Shopper Tests Internet Content Self-Regulation. Retrieved from http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/sites/pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/files/liberty.pdf  +
Ahn, Illtae, and Kiho Yoon. On the impact of digital music distribution. CESifo Economic Studies 55.2 (2009): 306-325.  +
Akbulut, Y. and Donmez, O. (2018) Predictors of digital piracy among Turkish undergraduate students. Telematics and Informatics, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp1324-1334  +
Akerlof, G. A., Arrow, K. J., Bresnahan, T., Buchanan, J. M., Coase, R., Cohen, L. R. & Hemphill, C. S. (2002). The copyright term extension act of 1998: An economic analysis. Washington DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.  +
Akester, P. (2009). Technological accommodation of conflicts between freedom of expression and DRM: the first empirical assessment. Available at SSRN 1469412.  +
Akmon, D. (2010). Only with your permission: how rights holders respond (or don’t respond) to requests to display archival materials online. Archival Science, 10(1), 45-64.  +
Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. P. (2006). Digital Piracy: Factors That Influence Attitude Toward Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 237-259.  +
Al-Rafee, S., & Dashti, A. E. (2012). A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Extended TPB: The Case of Digital Piracy. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 15(1), 5-24.  +
Al-Rafee, S., & Rouibah, K. (2010). The fight against digital piracy: An experiment. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 283-292.  +
Albinsson, S. (2013) Swings and roundabouts: Swedish music copyrights 1980 - 2009. Journal of Cultural Economics 37, 175 - 184  +
Aleassa, H., Pearson, J. M., & McClurg, S. (2011). Investigating software piracy in Jordan: An extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 663-676.  +
Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2009). Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 49-56.  +
Andembubtob, D.R., Apuru, J.I. and Ezra, S.D. (2020) Software Piracy in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science 6(1)  +
Andersen, B., & Frenz, M. (2008). The impact of music downloads and P2P file-sharing on the purchase of music in Canada.  +
Andersen, B. and Frenz, M. 2010. Don't Blame the P2P File-Sharers: The Impact of Free Music Downloads on the Purchase of Music CDs in Canada. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 715-740.  +
Andrés, A. R. (2006). The relationship between copyright software protection and piracy: Evidence from Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics, 21(1), 29-51.  +
Andrés, A. R. (2006). Software piracy and income inequality. Applied Economics Letters, 13(2), 101-105.  +
Angelopoulos, C. (2012). The myth of European term harmonisation: 27 public domains for the 27 member states. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2012) Vol, 43, 567-594.  +
Antelman, K. (2004) Do Open Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? College & Research Libraries News, vol. 65, n. 5, pp. 372-382.  +
Arai, Y. and Kinukawa, S., 2014. Copyright infringement as user innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), pp.131-144.  +
Arendt, J., Peacemaker, B. And Miller, H. (2018) Same Question, Different World: Replicating an Open Access Research Impact Study. College and Research Libraries (Preprint)  +
Arnold M. A., Darmon E., Dejean S. and Penard T., Graduated Response Policy and the Behaviour of Digital Pirates: Evidence from the French Three-Strike (Hadopi) Law (2014)  +
Simplice Asongu, (2014) "Software piracy, inequality and the poor: evidence from Africa", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 41 Issue: 4, pp.526-553, available under: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2012-0141.  +
T.M.C. Asser Instituut/Asser International Sports Law Centre and the Institute for Information Law - University of Amsterdam (2014) Study on Sports Organisers' Rights in the European Union, EAC/18/2012  +
Astle, P.J. and Muir, A., 2002. Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 34(2), pp.67-79.  +
Athey, S., Mobius, M. M., & Pál, J. (2017). The Impact of Aggregators on Internet News Consumption.  +
Attorney-General's Department (Australia), 2008, Review of copyright exceptions for private copying of photographs and films - final report, Attorney-General's Department (Australia)  +
Aufderheide, P., & Jaszi, P. (2004). Untold stories: Creative consequences of the rights clearance culture for documentary filmmakers.  +
Aufderheide, P., & Sinnreich, A. (2015). Documentarians, fair use, and free expression: changes in copyright attitudes and actions with access to best practices. Information, Communication & Society, (ahead-of-print), 1-10.  +
Aufderheide, P., Jaszi, P., Bieze, K. and Boyles, J. (2013) Copyright, Free Speech, and the Public's Right to Know: How Journalists Think About Fair Use. Journalism Studies, 14(6)  +
Aufderheide, P., Pappalardo, K., Suzor, N. And Stevens, J. (2018) Calculating the consequences of narrow Australian copyright exceptions: Measurable, hidden and incalculable costs to creators. Poetics, 69, pp15-26.  +
ALRC Report 122 (2013), available at http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/final_report_alrc_122_2nd_december_2013_.pdf.  +
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Manso, G. (2011). Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 527-554.  +
B
BOP Consulting, DotEcon (2015). International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement: Final Report, commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office.  +
Bae, Sang Hoo, and Jay Pil Choi. A model of piracy. Information Economics and Policy 18.3 (2006): 303-320.  +
Abbas Ghanbari Baghestan, Hadi Khaniki, Abdolhosein Kalantari, Mehrnoosh Akhtari-Zavare, Elaheh Farahmand, Ezhar Tamam, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Havva Sabani and Mahmoud Danaee (2019) A Crisis in “Open Access”: Should Communication Scholarly Outputs Take 77 Years to Become Open Access? SAGE Open 9(3)  +
Bahanovich, D., & Colloy, D. (2009). Music experience and behaviour in young people: 2009 National Survey. UK Music.  +
Bai, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2012). Movie piracy and sales displacement in two samples of Chinese consumers. Information Economics and Policy, 24(3), 187-196.  +
Baker, M., & Cunningham, B. (2006). Court decisions and equity markets: Estimating the value of copyright protection. Journal of Law and Economics 49(2), 567-596.  +
Balducci, F. (2009). Music or hi-tech lovers? Inferring into the determinants of music consumption. Rivista italiana degli economisti, 14(2), 361-0.  +
Balganesh, S., Manta, I., & Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2014). Judging similarity. 100 Iowa Law Review 267; University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-15; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-09. Available at SSRN 2409811.  +
Band, J. (2013). CEO compensation in copyright-intensive industries. Bandwidth. Available at SSRN 2333854.  +
Band, J. (2013). Profitability of firms in copyright-intensive industries. Bandwidth. Available at SSRN 2333844  +
Band, J. & Gerafi, J. (2013). Foreign ownership of firms in IP intensive industries. Policy Bandwidth. Available at SSRN 2333839.  +
Banerjee, Dyuti S., and Ajitava Raychaudhuri. OPTIMAL ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI‐COPYING STRATEGIES TO COUNTER COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Japanese Economic Review 59.4 (2008): 519-535.  +
Banerjee, D., Khalid, A. M., & Sturm, J. E. (2005). Socio-economic development and software piracy. An empirical assessment. Applied Economics, 37(18), 2091-2097.  +
Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The Labour of User Co-Creators Emergent Social Network Markets?. Convergence: the International Journal of research into New Media technologies, 14(4), 401-418.  +
Bar-Ziv, S. and Elkin-Koren, N. (2018) Behind the Scenes of Online Copyright Enforcement: Empirical Evidence on Notice & Takedown. Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 50(2).  +
Barker, G. R. (2012). Assessing the Economic Impact of Copyright Law: Evidence of the Effect of Free Music Downloads on the Purchase of Music CDs. Available at SSRN 1990153.  +
Barker, George Robert, 'Estimating the Economic Effects of Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: A Critique of Recent Research in Australia, US, Europe and Singapore' (November 26, 2012).  +
Barker, G. R. (2012). Evidence of the effect of free music downloads on the purchase of music CDs in Canada. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 9(2), 55-78.  +
Barker, G. R., & Maloney, T. J. (2012). The impact of free music downloads on the purchase of music CDs in Canada. ANU College of Law Research Paper, (4).  +
Beard, T.R., Ford, G.S., and Stern, M. (2018) Safe Harbours and the Evolution of Online Platform Markets: An Economic Analysis. 36 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 309  +
Bechtold, S., 2013. The fashion of TV show formats.  +
Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C. And Sprigman, J.C. (2016) Innovation Heuristics: Experiments on Sequential Creativity in Intellectual Property. Indiana Law Journal, 2016, Forthcoming.  +
Beebe, B. (2008). An empirical study of US copyright fair use opinions, 1978-2005. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 549-624.  +
Beekhuyzen, J., Von Hellens, L. and Nielsen, S. 2011. Underground online music communities: exploring rules for membership. Online Information Review, 35, 699-715.  +
Belleflamme, Paul. Pricing information goods in the presence of copying. U of London Queen Mary Economics Working Paper 463 (2002).  +
Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2010). Digital piracy: Theory. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3222. Available at SSRN 1698618.  +
Belleflammea, Paul, and Martin Peitzb. Digital piracy. (2014).  +
Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N. and Peitz, M., 2015. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, pp.11-28.  +
Bellemare, M. F., & Holmberg, A. M. (2010). The determinants of music piracy in a sample of college students. Available at SSRN 1481272.  +
Benkler, Y. (1999). Free as the air to common use: First amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain. NyuL Rev., 74, 354.  +
Benson, S.R. (2018) ncreasing Librarian Confidence and Comprehension in a Fair Use Training Session. Libraries and the Academy, Vol 18(4), pp 781-804 (preprint)  +
Benson, S.R. and Stitzlein, H. (2019) Copyright and Digital Collections: A Data Driven Roadmap for Rights Statement Success. ACRL 2019 Proceedings.  +
Bently, L. (2002). Between a rock and a hard place: The problems facing freelance creators in the UK media market–place. London: Institute of Employment Rights. ii. Canada.  +
Bently, L., Kretschmer, M., Dudenbostel, T., Moreno, M. and Radauer, A. (2017) Strengthening the Position of Press Publishers and Authors and Performers in the Copyright Directive. Project Report. European Parliament, Brussels.  +
Bessen, J. E. (2005). Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods. Boston University. Available at SSRN 588763.  +
Bezmen, T. L., & Depken, C. A. (2006). Influences on software piracy: Evidence from the various United States. Economic Letters, 90(3), 356-361.  +
BHAL, K. T. and LEEKHA, N. D. 2008. Exploring cognitive moral logics using grounded theory: The case of software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 635-646.  +
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., & Sanders, G. L. (2003). Digital music and online sharing: Software piracy 2.0?. Communications of the ACM, 46(7), 107-111.  +
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R., Lertwachara, K. and Marsden, J. R. 2006a. Whatever Happened to payola? An Empirical Analysis of Online Music Sharing. Decision Support Systems, 42, 104-120.  +
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., Lertwachara, K., & Marsden, J. R. (2006). Impact of Legal Threats on Online Music Sharing Activity: An Analysis of Music Industry Legal Actions*. Journal of law and economics, 49(1), 91-114.  +
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., Lertwachara, K., Marsden, J. R., & Telang, R. (2007). The effect of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Science, 53(9), 1359-1374.  +
Biasi, B. and Moser, P. (2018) Effects of Copyrights on Science. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics  +
Björk, B.C., The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles–a Failed Experiment?.  +
Blackburn, D . (2004). A study of online piracy and recorded music sales. Harvard University, Working Paper.  +
BMRB Social Research. (2009). Future copyright development. Intellectual Property Office, UK.  +
Bockstedt, J., Kauffman, R. J., & Riggins, F. J. (2004). The move to artist-led online music distribution: Explaining structural changes in the digital music market. Paper accepted at the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.  +
Bodo, B., Antal, D. and Puha, Z. (2020) Open access is not a panacea, even if it’s radical – an empirical study on the role of shadow libraries in closing the inequality of knowledge access. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-39  +
Bohannon, J. (2016). Who is downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science, 352 (6285), 508-512. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6285.508  +
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2005). Intellectual property and the efficient allocation of social surplus from creation. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2(1), 45-67.  +
Bonner, S., & O'Higgins, E. (2010). Music piracy: ethical perspectives. Management Decision, 48(9), 1341-1354.  +
Boorstin, E. S. Music Sales in the Age of File Sharing (Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University).  +
Borghi, M., Maggiolino, M., Montagnani, M.L. & Nuccio, M. (2012). Determinants in the online distribution of digital content: An exploratory analysis. European Journal for Law and Technology, 3(2), 1-29.  +
Bounie, D., Bourreau, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy and the demand for films: Analysis of piracy behavior in French universities. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 3(2), 15-27.  +
Bounie, D., Bourreau, M., & Waelbroeck, P. 2007. Pirates or explorers? Analysis of music consumption in French graduate schools. Brussels Economic Review, 50(2), 167-192.  +
Branstetter, L.G., Fisman, R., & Foley, C. F. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321-349.  +
Brassell, M. & Goodyer, I. (2015) Penalty Fair? Study of criminal sanctions for copyright infringement available under the CDPA 1988. IPO, 2015  +
Brauneis, R. and Olliar, D. (2016) Copyright’s Race, Gender and Age: A First Quantitative Look at Registrations. GWU Law School Public Law Research paper No. 2016-48  +
Breyer, S., 1970. The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, pp.281-351.  +
Brooks, T. (2005). Survey of reissues of US recordings. Council on Library and Information Resources.  +
Bryce, J., & Rutter, J. (2005). Fake Nation? A study into an everyday crime. The Intellectual Property Theft and Organised Crime research project, UK.  +
Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000). Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46(4), 563-585.  +
Brøvig-Hanssen, R., & Jones, E. (2021). Remix’s retreat? Content moderation, copyright law and mashup music. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211026059  +
Buccafusco, C. J. (2012). Making Sense of Intellectual Property Law. Cornell Law Review, 97, 501.  +
Buccafusco, C. and Garcia, K. (2021) Pay-to-Playlist: The Commerce of Music Streaming. 12 UC Irvine L. Rev (forthcoming 2021)  +
Buccafusco, C., & Heald, P. J. (2012). Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 28, 1.  +
Buccafusco, Christopher, and Jonathan S. Masur. Innovation and Incarceration: An Economic Analysis of Criminal Intellectual Property Law. S. Cal. L. Rev. 87 (2013): 275.  +
Buccafusco, C. J., & Sprigman, C. J. (2010). Valuing Intellectual Property: An Experiment. Cornell Law Review.  +
Buccafusco, C. J., Burns, Z. C., Fromer, J. C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2014). Experimental Tests of Intellectual Property Laws’ Creativity Thresholds. Texas Law Review, 93, 1921.  +
Burgess, M. and De Rosa, M. (2017) The Remuneration of Canadian Writers for Literary Works: A Benchmarking Study. A Report prepared for The Writers’ Union of Canada. Avaialble: https://www.writersunion.ca/sites/all/files/attachments/Study%20on%20Remuneration%20of%20Writers%20September%202017_0.pdf (last accessed: 3 June 2019)  +
Buss, P., & Peukert, C. (2015). R&D outsourcing and intellectual property infringement. Research Policy, 44(4), 977-989.  +
Buxmann, P., Pohl, G., Johnscher, & P., Strube, J. (2005). Strategies for digital music markets: Pricing and the effectiveness of measures against pirate copies. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 47(2), 118-125.  +
C
Calzada, J., & Gil, R. (2016). What Do News Aggregators Do? Evidence from Google News in Spain and Germany.  +
Camerani, R., Grassano, N., Chavarro, D. & Tang, P. (2013) Private Copying, IPO, 2013  +
Cameron, S. (1988). The impact of video recorders on cinema attendance. Journal of Cultural Economics, 12(1), 73-80.  +
Cameron, L., & Bazelon, C. (2013). The impact of digitization on business models in copyright driven industries: a review of economic issues. Brattle Groupe paper prepared for the US National Research Council, available at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_063398.pdf.  +
Campagnolo, G.M., Giannatou, E., Franklin, M., Stewart, J., and Williams, R. (2018) Revolution remixed? The emergence of Open Content Film-making as a viable component within the mainstream film industry. Information, Communication and Society, pp1-18. ISSN 1369-118X  +
Canat, J., Guibault, L. and Logeais, E., Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums, World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) SCCR/30/2.  +
Smith, J., & Jones, S. (2015). On the matter of copyright evidence. The Journal of Foobar 1(1).  +
http://is.muni.cz/el/1456/jaro2014/BPV_CMME/46836843/The_Production_and_Consumption_of_the_Arts_30.pdf  +
Andrés, A. R. (2006). Software piracy and income inequality. Applied Economics Letters, 13(2), 101-105.  +
http://infojustice.org/gc-research-survey/gc-research-survey-results From Karaganis  +
test test  +
https://hackpad.com/PhD-Reading-List-for-Economics-of-Digitization-nbNSwjRb9mA From Waldfogel  +
test  +
International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/404429/International_Comparison_of_Approaches_to_Online_Copyright_Infringement.pdf  +
Kimberlee K. Kovach, ‘Mediation Principles and Practice’, 2004. I cannot find the pdf! But it might be relevant.  +
Update this study: Adermon and Liang (2011) It has been published as: Adermon, Adrian, Che-Yuan Liang. 2014. Piracy and Music Sales: The Effects of an Anti-Piracy Law. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 105, 90-106.  +
Aguiar, Luis, Jorg Claussen, Christian Peukert. 2015. Online Copyright Enforcement, Consumer Behavior, and Market Structure. Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark (available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2604197).  +
Danaher, Brett, Michael D. Smith, Rahul Telang. 2015(a). The Effect of Piracy Website Blocking on Consumer Behavior. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2612063).  +
Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S. M., & Tucker, C. E. (Eds.). (2015). Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. University of Chicago Press.  +
Kerr, W. R., Lerner, J., & Stern, S. (2015). Innovation Policy and the Economy 2014.  +
Include all these volumes: http://papers.nber.org/booksbyseries/IP.html  +
Liebowitz, Stan. 2014. The Impacts of Internet Piracy. Chapter 13, The Economics of Copyright: A Handbook for Students and Teachers, Watt, ed; Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 225-240. Ma, Liye, Alan Montgomery, Michael D. Smith, Param Singh. 2014. The Effect of Pre-Release Movie Piracy on Box Office Revenue. Information Systems Research. 25(3) 590-603.  +
Sivan, Liron, Michael D. Smith, Rahul Telang. 2015. Do Search Engines Influence Media Piracy? Evidence from a Randomized Field Study. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2495591).  +
Smith, Michael D., Rahul Telang. 2015. Windows of Opportunity: The Impact of Piracy and Delayed International Availability on DVD Sales. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.  +
add these papers: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2008/si2008/ippiprg.html  +
add these studies: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2008/si2008/ippiprg.html  +
add these studies: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2007/si2007/prlprg.html  +
add these studies: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2006/si2006/prlprg.html  +
add these studies: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2005/si2005/prlprg.html  +
add these studies: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2004/si2004/prlprg.html  +
add of these studies: http://users.nber.org/~confer/2003/si2003/prlprg.html  +
Landes, W., & Lichtman, D. (2003). Indirect liability for copyright infringement: Napster and beyond. Journal of economic perspectives, 113-124.  +
Varian, H. R. (2005). Copying and copyright. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 121-138.  +
Kimberlee Weatherall, Elizabeth Webster and Lionel Bently, IP Enforcement in the UK and Beyond: A Literature Review, 2009.  +
file:///Users/tk59s/Downloads/Survey%2520of%2520Intellectual%2520Property%2520Management%2520%2528SIPM%2529.htm http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3Instr.pl?Function=getInstrumentList&Item_Id=117739&UL=1V&  +
Understanding the costs and benefits ofintroducing a 'fair use' exception. https://www.screenrights.org/sites/default/files/uploads/PwC_Fair_Dealing_CBA_Final.pdf  +
A Counterfactual Impact Analysis of Fair Use Policy on Copyright Related Industries in Singapore https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwijq9a3zY3LAhXBlg8KHR-vBlEQFggsMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2075-471X%2F3%2F2%2F327%2Fpdf&usg=AFQjCNFHo2KQgYKOdCFrm34fWraCBlLKYw&sig2=dn2myKGn3Src9G9xYPTI0g  +
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/404429/International_Comparison_of_Approaches_to_Online_Copyright_Infringement.pdf  +
Collopy, Dennis, Vanessa Bastian, Tim Drye, Florian Koempel, Davis Lewis, and Peter Jenner. "Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights." (2014).  +
Muthoo, A. (2006). Bargaining theory and royalty contract negotiations. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 3(1), 19-27.  +
http://www.nber.org/chapters/c13586.pdf  +
Throsby, C. D. (1990). Perception of Quality in Demand for the Theatre. Journal of cultural economics, 14(1), 65-82.  +
https://australiacouncil.gov.au/workspace/uploads/files/research/do_you_really_expect_to_get_pa-54325a3748d81.pdf  +
Intellectual Property and Youth Website https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/ip-youth-scoreboard PDF https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/IP_youth_scoreboard_study/IP_youth_scoreboard_study_en.pdf  +
http://www.prsformusic.com/aboutus/policyandresearch/researchandeconomics/Documents/TheSixBusinessModelsofCopyrightInfringement.pdf  +
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changing-business-models-in-the-creative-industries  +
Cohen, Lauren and Gurun, Umit G. and Kominers, Scott Duke, Patent Trolls: Evidence from Targeted Firms (April 24, 2016). Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 15-002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2464303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464303 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2464303  +
Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone John Bohannon Science 29 Apr 2016: Vol. 352, Issue 6285, pp. 508-512 DOI: 10.1126/science.352.6285.508 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6285/508  +
The growing problem of patent trolling Lauren Cohen, Umit G. Gurun, Scott Duke Kominers Science 29 Apr 2016: Vol. 352, Issue 6285, pp. 521-522 DOI: 10.1126/science.aad2686 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6285/521  +
OECD and EUIPO (2016). Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods. Mapping the economic impact. <http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/trade-in-counterfeit-and-pirated-goods_9789264252653-en#page1>  +
COMMISSION STAFF (2011). WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights  +
European Commission (2016). Public consultation on the protection against misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential business information - Appendix 6 Country Specific Questionnaires- IP & Commerecial Law - Ref. Ares(2016)165284 - 12/01/2016  +
European Commission (2016). Public consultation on the protection against misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential business information - Appendix 1 Intellectual Property and Commercial Law – Country Report - Ref. Ares(2016)165284 - 12/01/2016  +
Trade Secrets & Innovation Coalition (2011). Comments for the consultation on the commission report on the enforcement of intellectual property rights.  +
Technopolis (2014). Study: “Effects of counterfeiting on EU SMEs and a review of various public and private IPR enforcement initiatives and resources”. Final report  +
European Commission (2013). Public consultation on the protection against misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential business information. Summary of responses  +
Radauer, A., et al. (2007). Benchmarking National and Regional Support Services for SMEs in the field of intellectual and industrial property.  +
CSES (2014). Making IPR work for SMEs. Expert group final report  +
European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses "Civil enforcement of intllectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures”  +
Szychowska, K. (2006) Taking of Evidence in Intellectual Property Matters under Regulations 44/01 and 1206/2001, I.R.D.I. (Intellectuele rechten / Droits intellectuels) 111  +
De Wolf and Crids (2013). Study on the application of directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society (the "Infosoc Directive").  +
Hess, B., et al. (2007). Report on the Application of Regulation Brussels I in the Member States.  +
IPO (2014). Artist’s Resale Right - Summary of IPO survey findings  +
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2015). Review of the enforcement provisions of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in respect of copycat packaging.  +
Her Majesty's Government (2015). Proposed changes to the Registered Designs Act 1949 Government response to the call for evidence: Proposal to introduce an option for design owners to mark their products with a relevant website address as a way of providing public notice of their intellectual property rights  +
Her Majesty's Government (2015). Government response to the consultation on reducing the duration of copyright in certain unpublished works.  +
Kretschmer, M. (2011). Private copying and fair compens. An empirical study of copyright levies in Europe.  +
Mitra-Kahn, B., et al. (2013). Patent backlogs, inventories and pendency: An international framework.  +
IPO (2016). Gender profiles in UK patenting: An analysis of female inventorship  +
Her Majesty's Goverment (2016). Criminal sanctions for online copyright infringement. Government consultation response.  +
Goodridge, P., et al. (2012). Updating the value of UK copyright investment  +
Kaldos, P., and Miranda, D. (2013). Expert Group Report on Intellectual Property Valuation.  +
WIPO (2011). How the Private and the Public Sectors Use Intellectual Property to Enhance Agricultural Productivity.  +
Mendis, D., et al. (2015). A Legal and Empirical Study into the Intellectual Property Implications of 3D Printing.  +
BPI (2009). The impact of illegal downloading on music purchasing.  +
EUIPO (2016). Infringement of protected geographical indications for wine, spirits, agricultural products and foodstuffs in the European Union.  +
EUIPO (2016). Intellectual Property and Youth.  +
EUIPO (2016). The economic cost of IPRs infringement in jewellery and watches.  +
EUIPO (2016). The economic cost of IPRs infringement in handbags and luggage.  +
EPO and OHIM (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union.  +
OHIM (2015). Intellectual property rights and firm performance in Europe: an economic analysis.  +
Oxford Economics. Consultation on copyright. Comments on economic impacts.  +
Alliance for IP. Proving the connection. Links between intellectual property theft and organised crime.  +
Sepetys, K., & Cox, A. (2009). Intellectual property rights protection in China: Trends in litigation and economic damages. NERA Economic Consulting.  +
Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., & Heath, C. (2007). On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed”. Research Policy, 36(1), 134-154.  +
Starr, I. C. (Clifford Chance) (1987), ‘Great Britain’, in Boujou, A. (ed), Patent Infringement Litigation Costs: A Practical Worldwide Survey; London: Longman, pp. 75-86.  +
CJA (2003). Litigation Insurance. A study for the European Commission on possible insurance schemes against patent litigation risks.  +
CJA (2006). Patent litigation insurance. A Study for the European Commission on the feasibility of possible insurance schemes against patent litigation risks.  +
European Commission (2007). Summary report of replies to the public consultation on the follow-up study on patent litigation insurance, carried out by CJA Consultants, Ltd  +
Bessen, J. E., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). The private costs of patent litigation. Boston University School of Law Working Paper, (07-08).  +
Bebchuk, L. A. (1984) ‘Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information’, RAND Journal of Economics, 15(3), 405-415.  +
IPO (2013) Guide to Evidence for Policy Update 2013  +
Kretschmer, M., Towse, R., Bakhshi, H., Derclaye, E., Edwards, L., Erickson, K., ... & Humphries, L. (2013). What Constitutes Evidence for Copyright Policy?.  +
Time.lex-Siemens (2010).Study on rapid information exchange on counterfeiting and piracy for European Commission IDABC.  +
IFPI (2013). Digital Music report 2013. Engine of a digital world.  +
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs. Observatory update on Cost and Damages.  +
European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010). Damages in Intellectual Property Rights.  +
European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights (2016). The economic cost of IPR infringements in sport goods.  +
European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights (2016).The economic cost of IPR infringement in the toys and games sector.  +
European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights (2016). Digital Advertising on Suspected Infringing Websites  +
Novos, I.E. and Waldman, M., 1984. The effects of increased copyright protection: An analytic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, pp.236-246.  +
Kretschmer, M. and Hardwick, P., 2007. Authors’ earnings from copyright and non-copyright sources: A survey of 25,000 British and German writers. Report published by Bournemouth University, UK.  +
Lessig, L., 2004. Free (ing) culture for remix. Utah L. Rev., p.961.  +
Lessig, L., 2004. Free (ing) culture for remix. Utah L. Rev., p.961.  +
Ferreira, F. and Waldfogel, J., 2013. Pop internationalism: has half a century of world music trade displaced local culture?. The Economic Journal, 123(569), pp.634-664.  +
Gomez-Herrera, E., Martens, B. and Turlea, G., 2014. The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 28, pp.83-96.  +
Björk, B.C., 2012. The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), pp.1496-1504.  +
Reichman, J.H. and Okediji, R.L., 2012. When copyright law and science collide: empowering digitally integrated research methods on a global scale. Minnesota law review, 96(4), p.1362.  +
Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., Maskus, K.E., Okediji, R.L., Reichman, J.H. and Stiglitz, J.E., 2014. The role of intellectual property rights in developing countries: Some conclusions. Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Economic Challenges for Development, pp.503-513.  +
Lemley, M.A., 2004. Ex ante versus ex post justifications for intellectual property. The University of Chicago law review, pp.129-149.  +
Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A., 1989. An economic analysis of copyright law. The Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), pp.325-363.  +
Cohen, J.E., 2006. Copyright, commodification, and culture: Locating the public domain.  +
Peitz, M. and Waelbroeck, P., 2006. Why the music industry may gain from free downloading—the role of sampling. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), pp.907-913.  +
Banerjee, D.S., 2003. Software piracy: a strategic analysis and policy instruments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(1), pp.97-127.  +
Belleflamme, P., Omrani, N. and Peitz, M., 2015. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Information Economics and Policy, 33, pp.11-28.  +
Png, I.P. and Wang, Q.H., 2009. Copyright law and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies. Manuscript, National University of Singapore.  +
Buccafusco, C. and Sprigman, C.J., 2011. The creativity effect. University of Chicago Law Review, 78, p.31.  +
Coombe, R.J. and Herman, A., 2001. Culture wars on the net: Intellectual property and corporate propriety in digital environments.  +
Kheria, S., 2012. Copyright and Digital Art: Through the Looking Glass. Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper, (2012/19).  +
Bechtold, S., 2013. The Fashion of TV Show Formats.  +
Arai, Y. and Kinukawa, S., 2014. Copyright infringement as user innovation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(2), pp.131-144.  +
Lee, H.K., 2011. Participatory media fandom: A case study of anime fansubbing. Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), pp.1131-1147.  +
Shavell, S. and Van Ypersele, T., 1999. Rewards versus intellectual property rights (No. w6956). National Bureau of Economic Research.  +
Heald, P.J., 2009. Does the song remain the same-an empirical study of bestselling musical compositions (1913-1932) and their use in cinema (1968-2007). Case W. Res. L. Rev., 60, p.1.  +
Salzberger, E., 2006. Economic Analysis of the Public Domain.  +
Bourreau, M., Gensollen, M. and Moreau, F., 2012. The impact of a radical innovation on business models: Incremental adjustments or big bang?. Industry and Innovation, 19(5), pp.415-435.  +
Smith, M.D. and Telang, R., 2012. Assessing the academic literature regarding the impact of media piracy on sales. Available at SSRN 2132153.  +
Strumpf, K. and Oberholzer-Gee, F., 2010. The Impact of File Sharing on Movies. Working Paper, Northwestern.  +
Peukert, C., Claussen, J. and Kretschmer, T., 2015. Piracy and Box Office Movie Revenues: Evidence from Megaupload. Available at SSRN 2176246.  +
Danaher, B., Smith, M.D., Telang, R. and Chen, S., 2014. The Effect of Graduated Response Anti‐Piracy Laws on Music Sales: Evidence from an Event Study in France. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(3), pp.541-553.  +
Arnold, M.A., Darmon, E., Dejean, S. and Penard, T., 2014. Graduated response policy and the behavior of digital pirates: Evidence from the french three-strike (hadopi) law. Available at SSRN 2380522.  +
Lemley, M.A. and Shafir, Z., 2011. Who Chooses Open-Source Software?. The University of Chicago Law Review, pp.139-164.  +
Searle, N., 2011. Changing Business Models in the Creative Industries: The cases of Television, Computer Games and Music. Computer Games and Music (August 5, 2011).  +
Handke, C., 2012. A Taxonomy of Empirical Research on Copyright-How Do We Inform Policy?. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 9(1), pp.47-92.  +
Gordon, W.J., 2004. Render copyright unto Caesar: On taking incentives seriously. U. Chi. L. Rev., 71, p.75.  +
Png, I. and Wang, Q.H., 2006. Copyright duration and the supply of creative work: Evidence from the movies. National University of Singapore working paper, pp.1-35.  +
Pollock, R., 2007, August. Forever minus a day? Some theory and empirics of optimal copyright. In Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues Annual Congress. Humboldt-UniversitÃd’t Berlijn: Cambridge University.  +
Rob, R. and Waldfogel, J., 2004. Piracy on the high C's: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students (No. w10874). National Bureau of Economic Research.  +
Ghose, A., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R., 2006. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Information Systems Research, 17(1), pp.3-19.  +
Fromer, J.C., 2012. Expressive Incentives in Intellectual Property. Virginia Law Review, pp.1745-1824.  +
Depoorter, B. and Walker, R.K., 2013. Copyright false positives.  +
Suh, D. and Oh, D.H., 2015. The role of software intellectual property rights in strengthening industry performance: Evidence from South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, pp.140-154.  +
Liu, J., 2014. Copyright for Blockheads: An Empirical Study of Market Incentive and Intrinsic Motivation. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 38.  +
Cohen, J.E., 2011. Copyright as Property in the Post-Industrial Economy: A Research Agenda. Wis. L. Rev., p.141.  +
Mandel, G.N., 2014. Public Perception of Intellectual Property, The. Fla. L. Rev., 66, p.261.  +
Johnson, E.E., 2011. Intellectual property and the incentive fallacy.  +
DiCola, P.C. and Touve, D., 2014. Licensing in the Shadow of Copyright.  +
Humphreys, S., Fitzgerald, B., Banks, J. and Suzor, N., 2005. Fan-based production for computer games: User-led innovation, the ‘Drift of Value’and intellectual property rights. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 114(1), pp.16-29.  +
Castañer, X. and Campos, L., 2002. The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(1), pp.29-52.  +
Hugenholtz, P.B. and Okediji, R., 2012. Conceiving an international instrument on limitations and exceptions to copyright. Study supported by the Open Society Institute (OSI), March, 6(2008).  +
IPO (2013). IP Crime. Annual report 2012-2013.  +
IPO (2014). IP Crime Report 2013/2014.  +
IPO (2015). IP Crime Report 2014-2015.  +
IPO (2016). Intellectual Property Awareness Survey.  +
Envisional (2011). An estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet.  +
Kochhar, S. (2011). Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges in IPR and Agriculture in the Indian Context. J. Intell. Prop. Rights, 16, 69-73.  +
Merz, J. F. (2005). Intellectual Property and Product Development Public/Private Partnerships. Intellectual Property and Product Development Public/Private Partnerships. Chicago  +
IPO (2016). Government Response to the further consultation and technical review on changes to Section 72 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (which permits the free public showing or playing of a film contained in a broadcast).  +
IPO (2016). Consultation on new transitional provisions for the repeal of section 52 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988: Government Response and Summary of Responses.  +
IPO (2016). Collective rights management in the Digital Single Market.  +
Her Majesty's Government (2015). Unjustified threats on intellectual property rights: Government Response.  +
IPO (2015). Fast facts 2015.  +
Robinson, M.D. and Montgomery, S.S., 2000. The time allocation and earnings of artists. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 39(3), pp.525-534.  +
Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G.M. and Wallis, R., 2001. Music in Electronic Markets An Empirical Study. New Media & Society, 3(4), pp.417-441.  +
Hagedoorn, J. and Ridder, A.K., 2012. Open innovation, contracts, and intellectual property rights: an exploratory empirical study.  +
Rietveld, J., 2015. Value Creation from Complements in Platform Markets: Studies on the Video Game Industry (Doctoral dissertation, City University London).  +
Quiring, O., Von Walter, B. and Atterer, R., 2008. Can filesharers be triggered by economic incentives? Results of an experiment. New Media & Society, 10(3), pp.433-453.  +
Throsby, C.D., 2008. Creative Australia: The arts and culture in Australian work and leisure. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.  +
Waelde, C., Kheria, S. and Levin, N., 2015. Copyright and Publicly-Funded Arts and Humanities Research: Identifying and Developing Sustainable Exploitation Models in the Digital Economy. This paper was prepared as a report for the Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK (2015).  +
Buss, P. and Peukert, C., 2015. R&D outsourcing and intellectual property infringement. Research Policy, 44(4), pp.977-989.  +
Frye, B.L., Ryan, C.J. and Runge, F.L., 2016. An Empirical Study of Law Journal Copyright Practices. Available at SSRN 2767875.  +
Heald, P.J., 2007. Property rights and the efficient exploitation of copyrighted works: an empirical analysis of public domain and copyrighted fiction best sellers. UGA Legal Studies Research Paper, (07-003).  +
Handke, C., Girard, Y. and Mattes, A., 2015. Copyright and innovation: Fit for digitization?. DIW Economic Bulletin, 5(16), pp.223-230.  +
Handke, C., 2015. Digitization and Competition in Copyright Industries: One Step Forward and Two Steps Back?. Homo Oeconomicus, 32.  +
Mortimer, J. H. (2007). Price Discrimination, Copyright Law, and Technological Innovation: Evidence from the Introduction of DVDs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1307-1350.  +
Hong Luo and Julie Holland Mortimer, "Copyright Enforcement: Evidence from Two Field Experiments", 2016.  +
Legros, P., & Ginsburgh, V. A. (2013). The economics of copyright levies on hardware. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 10(1), 20-35.  +
Journal on the topic: http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/qmjip/qmjip-overview.xml  +
Throsby, D. (1994). The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(1), 1-29.  +
Filer, R. (1986). The" Starving Artist"-Myth or Reality? Earnings of Artists in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 94(1), 56-75.  +
Filer, R. K. (1990). Arts and academe: The effect of education on earnings of artists. Journal of Cultural Economics, 14(2), 15-40.  +
CREMA - Series of papers: http://www.crema-research.ch/papers/papers10.htm  +
Poort, J., Leenheer, J., van der Ham, J., & Dumitru, C. (2014). Baywatch: Two approaches to measure the effects of blocking access to The Pirate Bay. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 383-392.  +
Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2015). Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(3), 223-262. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10887-015-9114-3  +
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2296095  +
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312002132  +
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015136  +
Lemley, M. A., & Reese, R. A. (2004). Reducing digital copyright infringement without restricting innovation. Stanford Law Review, 1345-1434.  +
Lemley, M. A. (1995). Convergence in the Law of Software Copyright?. High Technology Law Journal, 10(1), 1-34.  +
Lemley, M. A., & Reese, R. A. (2005). Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Peer-to-Peer Copyright Disputes, A. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 23, 1.  +
Lemley, M. A. (2009). Our Bizarre System for Proving Copyright Infringement. J. Copyright Soc'y USA, 57, 719.  +
http://copyright.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/CentreCopyrightStudies_Benefits-Costs-Copyright.pdf  +
IDEA wp series: http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/ SOS: http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/digital-piracy-and-its-impact-on-legal-sales-3/ http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/how-anti-piracy-efforts-influence-consumer-behavior/ http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/market-based-strategies-to-fight-piracy/ http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/changing-marketing-strategies-for-entertainment/ http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/consumer-responses-to-long-tail-content/ http://idea.heinz.cmu.edu/measuring-promotion-and-information-discovery-online/  +
Joseph, M. (2019). Commercialising on Copyrights: The Emergence of the Victorian Literary Agent. In Victorian Literary Businesses (pp. 83-116). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.  +
Cantatore, F. (2014). From vault to honesty box: Australian authors and the changing face of copyright. Bond Law Review, 25(1), 5.  +
Carpou, Z. (2016) Robots, Pirates and the Rise of the Automated Takedown Regime: Using the DMCA to Fight Piracy and Protect End-Users. 39 Colum J.L. & Arts 551.  +
Carrier, M. A. (2012). Copyright and innovation: The untold story. Wisconsin Law Review 891. Available at SSRN 2099876  +
Castañer, X. and Campos, L., 2002. The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(1), pp.29-52.  +
Cave, M., Deegan, M. and Heinink, L., 2000. Copyright clearance in the refugee studies centre digital library project. RLG DigiNews, 4(5).  +
Cenite, M., Wang, M. W., Peiwen, C., & Chan, G. S. (2009). More Than Just Free Content Motivations of Peer-to-Peer File Sharers. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33(3), 206-221.  +
Center for Social Media. (2010). Clipping Our Own Wings: Copyright and Creativity in Communication Research. American University.  +
Centre for intellectual property and information law. (2006). Review of the Economic Evidence Relating to an Extension of the Term of Copyright in Sound Recordings. University of Cambridge  +
Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (2016), Response to Article 11 of the Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, entitled ‘Protection of press publications concerning digital uses’ on behalf of thirty seven professors and leading scholars of Intellectual Property, Information Law and Digital Economy  +
Chan, R. Y. K. and Lai, J. W. M. 2011. Does Ethical Ideology Affect Software Piracy Attitude and Behaviour? An Empirical Investigation of Computer Users in China European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 659-673.  +
Assessing the Economic Impacts of Adapting Certain Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights in the EU, Charles River Assoc., (2013), available at  +
Charles River Associates, Economic Analysis of the Territoriality of the Making Available Right in the EU (2014).  +
Charness, G., & Grieco, D. (2014). Creativity and Financial Incentives.  +
Cheliotis, G. (2007). Remix culture: an empirical analysis of creative reuse and the licensing of digital media in online communities.  +
Chen, Yeh-ning, and Ivan Png. Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Information Systems Research 14.1 (2003): 107-123.  +
Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474-493.  +
Chen, M. F. and Yen, Y. H. 2011. Costs and Utilities Perspective of Consumers' Intentions to Engage in Online Music Sharing: Consumers' Knowledge Matters. Ethics & Behavior, 21(4), 283-300.  +
Chen, M. F., Pan, C. T., & Pan, M. C. (2009). The joint moderating impact of moral intensity and moral judgment on consumer’s use intention of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 361-373.  +
Chen, Y. C., Shang, R. A., & Lin, A. K. (2008). The intention to download music files in a P2P environment: Consumption value, fashion, and ethical decision perspectives. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 411-422.  +
Cheng, H. K., Sims, R. R., & Teegen, H. (1997). To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 49-60.  +
Chiang, E., & Assane, D. (2002). Software copyright infringement among college students. Applied Economics, 34(2), 157-166.  +
Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2007). Determinants of Music Copyright Violations on the University Campus. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31(3), 187-204.  +
Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2008). Music piracy among students on the university campus: Do males and females react differently?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1371-1380.  +
Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2009). Estimating the willingness to pay for digital music. Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(4), 512-522.  +
Chiou, Lesley and Tucker, Catherine, Copyright, Digitization, and Aggregation (December 13, 2011). NET Institute Working Paper No. 11-18.  +
Chiou, J. S., Cheng, H. I., & Huang, C. Y. (2011). The effects of artist adoration and perceived risk of getting caught on attitude and intention to pirate music in the United States and Taiwan. Ethics & Behavior, 21(3), 182-196.  +
Chiou, J. S., Huang, C. Y., & Lee, H. H. (2005). The antecedents of music piracy attitudes and intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 161-174.  +
Chiu, H. C., Hsieh, Y. C. and Wang, M. C. 2008. How to Encourage Customers to use Legal Software. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 583-595.  +
Chullasang, N., & Wongpinunwatana, N. (2009). Individual Factors Impact on Pirating Digital Media in Thailand. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Warfare and Security (p. 35). Academic Conferences Limited.  +
Cockrill, A., & Goode, M. M. (2012). DVD Pirating Intentions: Angels, Devils, Chancers and Receivers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 1-10.  +
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J.P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent(or not). National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No.7552.  +
Collopy, D., Bastian, V., Drye, T., Koempel, F., Lewis, D., & Jenner, P. (2014). Measuring Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights.  +
DG Internal Market and Services Working Paper, Commission of the European Communities (2005)  +
Study on a Community Initiative on the Cross-border Collective Management of Copyright, Commission of the European Communities (2005), available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/management/study-collectivemgmt_en.pdf.  +
Condry, I. (2004). Cultures of music piracy An ethnographic comparison of the US and Japan. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(3), 343-363.  +
Cooper, E. and Burrow, S. (2018) Photographic Copyright and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Historical Perspective. CREATe Working Paper Series DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1246559.  +
Corbett, S., 2011. Archiving Our Culture in a Digital Environment: Copyright Law and Digitisation Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions. New Zealand Law Foundation Report.  +
Cornwell, J. (2017) Intellectual Property Litigation at the Court of Session: A First Empirical Investigation. Edinburgh Law Review, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp192-216.  +
Corporate Europe Observatory (2018) Copyright Directive: how competing big business lobbies drowned out critical voices. Available via: https://corporateeurope.org/en/2018/12/copyright-directive-how-competing-big-business-lobbies-drowned-out-critical-voices (last accessed: 7 June 2019)  +
Cotropia, C. A., & Gibson, J. (2014). Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation. Texas Law Review, 92(7).  +
Cotropia, C. And Gibson, J. (2016) Commentary to the U.S. Copyright Office Regarding the Section 512 Study: Higher Education and the DMCA Safe Harbors  +
Cox, J., Collins, A. and Drinkwater, S. 2010. Seeders, Leechers and Social Norms: Evidence From the Market for Illicit Digital Downloading. Information Economics and Policy, 22, 299-305.  +
Coyle, J. R., Gould, S. J., Gupta, P., & Gupta, R. (2009). “To buy or to pirate”: The matrix of music consumers' acquisition-mode decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1031-1037.  +
Creative Content Australia (2015). Australian Piracy Behaviours. 2015 Wave 7 Adults.  +
Crews, K., Study on Copyright Limitations and Related Rights, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Thirtieth Session, SCCR/30/3 (2015).  +
Cronan, T. P., & Al-Rafee, S. (2008). Factors that influence the intention to pirate software and media. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 527-545.  +
Cuntz, A. (, 2018). Creator’s Income Situation in the Digital Age. LIS Working Papers 755, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.  +
Cuntz, A. (2020) Grand rights and opera reuse today. WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No.62  +
D
d’Astous, A., Colbert, F., & Montpetit, D. (2005). Music piracy on the web–how effective are anti-piracy arguments? Evidence from the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 289-310.  +
Danaher, B., Smith, M., Teland, R.,'Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence and Conclusions', WIPO/ACE/10/20, 2015  +
Danaher, B., & Smith, M. D. (2014). Gone in 60 seconds: the impact of the Megaupload shutdown on movie sales. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 33, 1-8.  +
Danaher, B., & Waldfogel, J. (2012). Reel Piracy: The Effect of Online Film Piracy on International Box Office Sales. Available at SSRN 1986299.  +
Danaher, Brett and Hersh, Jonathan Samuel and Smith, Michael D. and Telang, Rahul, The Effect of Piracy Website Blocking on Consumer Behavior (August 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2612063 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2612063  +
Danaher, B., Dhanasobhon, S., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2010). Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: the impact of digital distribution on physical sales and internet piracy. Marketing science, 29(6), 1138-1151.  +
Danaher, B., Smith, M. D., Telang, R., & Chen, S. (2014). The Effect of Graduated Response Anti‐Piracy Laws on Music Sales: Evidence from an Event Study in France. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(3), 541-553.  +
Danbury, R. (2016). Is an EU publishers’ right a good idea? Final report on the AHRC project: Evaluating potential legal responses to threats to the production of news in a digital era, https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/sites/www.law.cam.ac.uk/files/images/www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/documents/copyright_and_news/danbury_publishers_right_report.pdf  +
Dang Nguyen, G., Dejean, S., & Moreau, F. (2012). Are streaming and other music consumption modes substitutes or complements?.  +
David, P. A. 1993. “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’ s Thumb: Patents , Copyrights and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History”, in M. Wallerstein, M. Mogee and R. Schoen (eds .), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology . Washington DC: National Academy Press; 19-61.  +
De Beer, J., & Bouchard, M. (2010). Canada's' Orphan Works' Regime: Unlocatable Owners and the Copyright Board. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 10(2), 215.  +
de Souza-Leão, A.L.M., Moura, B.M., de Santana, I.R.C., Nunes, W.K.S. and Henrique, V.M.R. (2019) Fans Make Art: Authoring and Creativity in the Production of Fanvideos. Studies on Emerging Countries, 4(24) pp 22-36  +
Triaille, J.P., Dusollier, S., Depreeuw, S., Hubin, J.B. and De Francquen, A., 2013. Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society. InfoSoc Directive.  +
De Wolf & Partners, Study on the Legal Framework of Text and Data Mining (TDM) (2014).  +
Study on the Making Available Right and its Relationship with the Reproduction Right in Cross-border Digital Transmissions, De Wolf & Partners (2014).  +
De Vany, A. S., & Walls, W. D. (2007). Estimating the effects of movie piracy on box-office revenue. Review of Industrial Organization, 30(4), 291-301.  +
Deazley, R. (2008) ‘Commentary on Milton's Contract 1667', in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org  +
Deloitte (2016) The impact of web traffic on revenues of traditional newspaper publishers A study for France, Germany, Spain, and the UK.  +
Denegri‐Knott, J. (2004). Sinking the online “music pirates:” Foucault, power and deviance on the web. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 9(4), 00-00.  +
C. A. Depken II & L. C. Simmons (2004) Social construct and the propensity for software piracy, Applied Economics Letters, 11:2, 97-100.  +
Depoorter, B. (2019) Copyright Enforcement in the Digital Age: When the Remedy is the Wrong. 66 UCLA L. Rev. 400  +
Depoorter, B. and Vanneste, S., 2006. Norms and enforcement: The case against copyright litigation. Oregon Law Review, 84(4), p.1127.  +
Depoorter, B. and Walker, R.K., 2013. Copyright false positives.  +
Depoorter, B., Vanneste, S., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Copyright Backlash. Southern California Law Review, 84.  +
Derclaye, E. (2014). Do patents, trademarks and designs foster happiness in developed countries? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 357-368.  +
Dholakiya, K., Mustapha, N., Niu, B. And Yang, A. (2014) A Micro-Level Examination of Content Takedown’s Consequences. CSCW 14 February 15-19, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.  +
DiCola, P. (2013). Money from Music: Survey Evidence on Musicians' Revenue and Lessons About Copyright Incentives. Ariz. L. Rev., 55, 301.  +
DiCola, P. C., & Touve, D. (2014). Licensing in the Shadow of Copyright.  +
Dickson, M., 2010. Due diligence, futile effort: Copyright and the digitization of the Thomas E. Watson papers. The American Archivist, 73(2), pp.626-636.  +
DCMS (2021) Economics of Music Streaming. House of Commons  +
DJEKIC, P. and LOEBBECKE, C. 2005. Software piracy prevention through digital rights management systems. In: MULLER, G. and LIN, K. J. (eds.) CEC 2005: Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology, Proceedings. Munich, Germany.  +
Dobusch, L., & Quack, S. (2013). Framing standards, mobilizing users: Copyright versus fair use in transnational regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 20(1), 52-88.  +
Domon, K., Melcarne, A. And Ramello, B. (2019) Digital piracy in Asian countries. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(1), pp. 117 - 135  +
Dootson, P. and Suzor, N. (2015) The Game of Clones and the Australia Tax: Divergent Views about Copyright Business Models and the Willingness of Australian Consumers to Infringe. University of New South Wales Law Journal 38.  +
Dryden, J.E., 2008. Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).  +
Dulong de Rosnay, M. and Langlais, P. (2017) <i>Public artworks and the freedom of panorama controversy: a case of Wikimedia influence</i>. Internet Policy Review Vol. 6(1)  +
Durham, Yvonne, Jack Hirshleifer, and Vernon L. Smith. Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? Experimental tests of a model of power. The American Economic Review 88.4 (1998): 970-983.  +
Dusollier, S., WIPO (2010) CDIP/4/3/REV./STUDY/INF/1.  +
E
Electronic Information For Libraries - The European Orphan Works Directive An EIFL Guide (2013)  +
EPO and OHIM (2013). Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union.  +
EY (2014) Creating Growth: Measuring Cultural and Creative Markets in the EU,  +
Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G., & Philip, F. (2015). Discourse, justification and critique: towards a legitimate digital copyright regime?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(1), 60-77.  +
Eger, T., Scheuen, M., and Meierreks, D. (2015) The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany. Eur J Law Econ, 39, p475-503  +
Ekiz, O. (2019) Documenting the copyright sphere: can festivals solve the problem of copyright clearance for documentaries? Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 9 (4)  +
Elkin-Koren, N., Nahmias, Y. And Perel, M. (2019) Is It Time to Abolish Safe Harbor? When Rhetoric Clouds Policy Goals. Stanford Law & Policy Review, Forthcoming  +
Engel, C., & Kurschilgen, M. J. (2011). Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), pp682-708  +
Engstrom, E. And Feamster, N. (2017) The Limits of Filtering: A Look at the Functionality & Shortcomings of Content Detection Tools. Available: https://www.engine.is/the-limits-of-filtering (last accessed 23 May 2019)  +
Envisional (2011), Technical report: An Estimate of Infringing Use of the Internet  +
Erickson, K. (2014) User Illusion: Ideological Construction of ‘User- Generated Content’ in the EC Consultation on Copyright. Internet Policy Review 4(3). DOI:10.14763/2014.4.331  +
Erickson, K. (2018) Can creative firms thrive without copyright? Value generation and capture from private-collection innovation. Business Horizons, 61:5, pp699-709  +
Erickson, K. and Kretschmer, M. (2018) “This Video is Unavailable”: Analysing Copyright Takedown of User-Generated Content on YouTube. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law (JIPITEC), 9(1)  +
Erickson, K. And Kretschmer, M. (2019) Empirical Approaches to Intermediary Liability in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY ONLINE (ed. Giancarlo Frosio), Oxford University Press, Forthcoming  +
Erickson, K., Heald, P. J., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the Value of the Public Domain: An Empirical Assessment. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper.  +
Erickson, K., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2013). Copyright and the Economic Effects of Parody: An Empirical Study of Music Videos on the YouTube Platform and an Assessment of the Regulatory Options. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, (2013/24).  +
Erickson, K., Kretschmer, M. and Mendis, D. (2019) “An Empirical Approach to the Public Domain” in Drexl, J. and Kamperman, J. Sanders (Eds.) The Innovation Society and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar  +
Erickson, K, Rodriguez Perez, F and Rodriguez Perez, J (2018) What is the Commons Worth? Estimating the Value of Wikimedia Imagery by Observing Downstream Use. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration. OpenSym ’18: The 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 22-24 Aug 2018, Paris, France. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). ISBN 978-1-4503-59 36-8  +
Report on the Implementation and Effect of the Resale Right Directive (2001/84/EC), European Commission (2011), available at  +
European Commission Impact assessment on the cross-border online access to orphan works (Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2011) 615 (final)  +
European Commission (2013). Synthesis of the responses: Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: Public consultation on efficiency of proceedings and accessibility measures  +
Guidelines on Recommended Standard Licences, Datasets and Charging for the Reuse of Documents, European Commission 2014/C 240/01, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=6421.  +
European Commission (2016) Synopsis Report on the Public Consultation on the Regulatory Environment for Platforms, Online Intermediaries and the Collaborative Economy,  +
European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010). Damages in Intellectual Property Rights.  +
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs.  +
Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries: Contribution to Economic Performance and Employment in the European Union, The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and the European Patent Office (2013) available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/intellectual-property/docs/joint-report-epo-ohim-final-version_en.pdf.  +
European Union Intellectual Property Office (2016). Intellectual Property and Youth.  +
F
Fagundes, D. And Perzanowski, A. (2019) Clown Eggs. Notre Dame Law Review, 94(3).  +
Faklaris, C. and Hook, S.A. (2017) Attitudes About ‘Fair Use’ and Content Sharing in Social Media Applications. CSCW 2017, February 25-March 1, 2017, Portland, OR, USA  +
Farooqui, S., Goodridge, P., & Haskel, J. (2011). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the UK Market Sector. Intellectual Property, 2.  +
Fauchart, E., & Von Hippel, E. (2008). Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organization Science, 19(2), 187-201.  +
Favale, M. (2011). Approximation and DRM: can digital locks respect copyright exceptions?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 19(4), 306-323  +
Favale, M. (2021). "The Role of the Court of Justice in the Development of EU Copyright Law: an Empirical Experience". In EU Copyright Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437808.00039  +
Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D., & Secchi, D. (2015). Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation. Available at SSRN 2613498.  +
Favale, M., Krestschmer, M., and Torremans, P.C. (2016) Is there an EU copyright jurisprudence? An empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice. Modern Law Review, 79(1): 31-75 (January 2016)  +
Favale, M., Kretschmer, M., and Torremans, P.L.C. (2018) Who Is Steering the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice? The Influence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3116703 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116703  +
Fetscherin, M. (2005). Movie piracy on peer-to-peer networks—the case of KaZaA. Telematics and Informatics, 22(1), 57-70.  +
Fetscherin, M. (2009). Importance of Cultural and Risk Aspects in Music Piracy: A Cross-National Comparison Among University Students. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 10(1), 42-55.  +
Fetscherin, M., & Lattemann, C. (2007, November). Motives and Willingness to Pay For Digital Music. In Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution, 2007. AXMEDIS'07. Third International Conference on (pp. 189-196). IEEE..  +
Fiala, L. and Husovec, M. (2018) Using Experimental Evidence to Design Optimal Notice and Takedown Process (July 23, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3218286  +
Fiesler, C. (2018) Everything I Needed to Know: Empirical Investigations of Copyright Norms in Fandom. IDEA - The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Centre for Intellectual Property. 59(1), pp 65 - 87  +
Fiesler, C. (2020) Lawful Users: Copyright Circumvention and Legal Constraints on Technology Use. Available: https://cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/CHI2020_DMCA_Fiesler.pdf (last accessed: 17 February 2020)  +
Fiesler, C. and Bruckman, A. (2019) Creativity, Copyright, and Close-Knit Communities: A Case Study of Social Norm Formation and Enforcement. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3,  +
Fiesler, C. & Zacher, C. Copyright’s Chilling Tale of Content Moderation: Understanding the Impact of Takedowns on Non-Infringing Content Creators. Available: https://www.kristelia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Fiesler-Zacher_Copyrights-Chilling-Tale.pdf (last accessed: 3 June 2021)  +
Fiesler, C., Feuston, J. L., & Bruckman, A. S. (2015, February). Understanding Copyright Law in Online Creative Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 116-129). ACM.  +
Fiesler, C, Lampe, C, Bruckman, A (2016) “Reality and Perception of Copyright Terms of Service for Online Content Creation” CSCW ’16 Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp1450-1461  +
Fietkiewicz K.J. (2020) The Law of Live Streaming: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of German Legal Framework. In: Meiselwitz G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Ethics, User Behavior, and Social Network Analysis. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12194. Springer, Cham. pp. 227-242  +
Filiciak, M., Hofmokl, J., & Tarkowski, A. (2012). The Circulations of Culture-On Social Distribution of Content. Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities: September 1st, 2012. Available at SSRN 2246508.  +
Flaherty, R. (2020) "Benefits of Quantitative and Doctrinal Methodological Approaches to Fan Studies Research." In "Fan Studies Methodologies," edited by Largent, J.E. Popova, M., and Vist, E. special issue, Transformative Works and Cultures, no. 33.  +
Fleming, P., Watson, S.J., Patouris, E., Bartholomew, K.J., and Zizzo, D.J. (2017) Why do people file share unlawfully? A systematic review, meta-analysis and panel study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, pp535-548  +
Fleming, P., Parravano, M., & Zizzo, D. J. (2016). To Pay or Not to Pay? Determinants of Unlawful Product Acquisition. CREATe Working Paper No 1 (January 2016).  +
Flynn, S. and Palmedo, M. (2017) The User Rights Database: Measuring the Impact of Copyright Balance. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3082371 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082371  +
Flynn, J., Giblin, R. And Petitjean, F. (2019) What Happens When Books Enter the Public Domain? Testing Copyright’s Underuse Hypothesis Across Australia, New Zealand, the United States and Canada. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42 (4)  +
Ford, G. S. (2014). What is the effect of file sharing on the creation of new music? A critical review of 'A case study of file sharing and music output'. Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies. Available at SSRN 2407145.  +
Forman, A. E. (2009). An exploratory study on the factors associated with ethical intention of digital piracy (Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University).  +
Frank, N. Magid Associates. 2009. Introducing Hollywood’s best customers: Vuze user vs. general internet: Comparative data.  +
Fromer, Jeanne C., and Mark A. Lemley. "Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement, The." Mich. L. Rev. 112 (2013): 1251.  +
Frosio, Giancarlo F. Open access publishing: a literature review. (2014).  +
Frosio, G. F. (2017). Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy.  +
Frye, B. L., Ryan, C. J., & Runge, F. L. (2016). An Empirical Study of Law Journal Copyright Practices. Available at SSRN 2767875.  +
Fukugawa, N. (2011). How Serious is Piracy in the Videogame Industry?. Empirical Economics Letters, 10(3), 225-233.  +
Fuller, P.B and Abdenour, J (2018) It’s Bigger Than Hip-Hop: Sampling and the Emergence of the Market Enhancement Model in Fair Use Case Law. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1 - 25.  +
Fyfe, A. (2020) The production, circulation, consumption and ownership of scientific knowledge: historical perspectives. CREATe Working Paper 2020/4  +
G
Gallagher, W. T. (2012). Trademark and copyright enforcement in the shadow of IP law. Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, 28.  +
Gan, L. L., & Koh, H. C. (2006). An empirical study of software piracy among tertiary institutions in Singapore. Information & Management, 43(5), 640-649.  +
Gani, M.W. (2020) An Empirical Analysis of the Status of Performing Authors’ Creative Autonomy in <i>Creative Autonomy, Copyright and Popular Music in Nigeria</i> Palgrave Macmillan Cambridge, pp 97-137  +
Garcia, Kristelia (2020) Contracts & Copyright: Contemporary Musician Income Streams. The Oxford Handbook of Music Law and Policy, Forthcoming, U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-32, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3620401 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3620401  +
Garcia, K. and McCrary, J. (2019) A Reconsideration of Copyright’s Term. Alabama Law Review, 71(2)  +
Garcia, K., Hicks, J. and McCrary, J. (2020) Copyright and Economic Viability: Evidence from the Music Industry. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (forthcoming 2020)  +
Garcia-Bardidia, R., Nau, J. P., & Rémy, E. (2011). Consumer Resistance and Anti-Consumption: Insights from the Deviant Careers of French Illegal Downloaders. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1789-1798.  +
García‐Álvarez, E., López‐Sintas, J., & Zerva, K. (2009). A contextual theory of accessing music: Consumer behavior and ethical arguments. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 12(3), 243-264.  +
Gasser, U. (2004) iTunes: How Copyright, Contract, and Technology Shape the Business of Digital Media – a Case Study. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publication No. 2004-07  +
Gecer, A.K. and Topal, A.D. (2019) Academic and postgraduate student awareness of digital product copyright issues. Information Development.  +
George, C. A. (2005). Testing the barriers to digital libraries: A study seeking copyright permission to digitize published works. New Library World, 106(7/8), 332-342.  +
Geradin, Damien. Access to content by new media platforms: a review of the competition law problems. European Law Review, February (2005).  +
Gerhardt, D. R. (2011). Copyright publication: an empirical study. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1).  +
Gerhardt, D. R. (2014). Copyright at the Museum: Using the Publication Doctrine to Free Art and History. Available at SSRN 2505041.  +
GfK Belgium, Provision of two online consumer surveys as support and evidence base to a Commission study: Identifying the main cross-border obstacles to the Digital Single Market and where they matter most  +
Ghose, A., Smith, M.D. and Telang, R., 2006. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Information Systems Research, 17(1), pp.3-19.  +
Gi-Kuen Jacob Li (2018) How copyright shaped the music industry: a comparative and empirical assessment on copyright enforcement in the PRC and the ROC, Voice and Speech Review, 11:2, 196-215, DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2017.1383485  +
Giannoumis, G.A. and Beyene, W.M. (2020) Cultural Inclusion and Access to Technology: Bottom-Up Perspectives on Copyright Law and Policy in Norway  +
Giblin, R., Kennedy, J., Weatherall, K., Gilbert, D., Thomas, J. and Petitjean, F. (expected June 2019) Available – but not accessible? Investigating publisher e-lending licensing practices. Forthcoming, Information Research; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 19/20.  +
Giblin, R., Kennedy, J., Pelletier, C., Thomas, J., Weatherall, K.G., and Petitjean, F. (2019) What Can 100,000 Books Tell Us about the International Public Library e-lending Landscape? Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 19/21  +
Gibson, J., Johnson, P. And Dimita, G. (2015) The Business of Being an Author: A Survey of Author’s Earnings and Contracts. Available: https://orca.cf.ac.uk/72431/1/Final%20Report%20-%20For%20Web%20Publication.pdf (last accessed: 23 May 2019)  +
Giletti, T., Why Pay if it’s Free? Streaming, Downloading and Digital Music Consumption in the “iTunes Era”, (2012)  +
Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research policy, 26(3), 283-301.  +
Giorcelli, M., & Moser, P. (2014). Copyright and Creativity: Evidence from Italian Operas. Available at SSRN 2505776.  +
Givon, M. , Mahajan, V. & Muller, E. (1995). Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 29-37.  +
Goel, S., Miesing, P., & Chandra, U. (2010). The impact of illegal peer-to-peer file sharing on the media industry. California Management Review, 52(3), 6-33.  +
Goles, T., Jayatilaka, B., George, B., Parsons, L., Chambers, V., Taylor, D., & Brune, R. (2008). Softlifting: Exploring determinants of attitude. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 481-499.  +
Gómez, Estrella and Martens, Bertin, Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital Single Market for Music and Film (May 6, 2015). JRC/IPTS Digital Economy working paper 2015-04.  +
Goodridge, P., Haskel, J. & Mitra-Kahn, B. (2012) Updating the value of UK copyright investment, IPO, 2012  +
Goolsbee, A., & Petrin, A. (2004). The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable TV. Econometrica, 72(2), 351-381.  +
Gopal, R. D., & Sanders, G. L. (1997). Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29-47.  +
Gopal, R. D., Bhattacharjee, S., & Sanders, G. L. (2006). Do Artists Benefit from Online Music Sharing?*. The Journal of Business, 79(3), 1503-1533.  +
Gordon, W. J. (1982). Fair use as market failure: a structural and economic analysis of the" Betamax" case and its predecessors. Columbia Law Review, 82(8), 1600-1657.  +
Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. The Stationery Office.  +
Rumi Graham,'An Evidence-Informed Picture of Course-Related Copying', College & Research Libraries, Vol 77, No 3 (2016), p.335-358. Available under: https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16513.  +
Graham, R. and Winter, C. (2017) What Happened After the 2012 Shift in Canadian Copyright Law? An Updated Survey on How Copyright is Managed across Canadian Universities. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12:3  +
Greenhalgh, C., Philips, J., Pitkethly, R., Rogers, M., & Tomalin, J. (2010). Intellectual Property Enforcement in Smaller UK Firms. Report for the Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP).  +
Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N., & Sutan, A. (2008). Please do not pirate it, you will rob the poor! An experimental investigation on the effect of charitable donations on piracy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2417-2426.  +
Grøndal, L. (2006) DRM and contract terms. Available at http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=177 (last accessed 19/01/2018)  +
Guadamuz, A. and Cabell, D. (2014) Data Mining in UK Higher Education Institutions: Law and Policy. Queen Mary Intellectual Property Review 4:1 pp. 3-29  +
Guibault, L. And Salamanca, O. (2016) Remuneration of authors of books and scientific journals, translators, journalists and visual artists for the use of their works. A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, Final Report. IViR.  +
Guibault, L., Salamanca, O. and van Gompel, S. (2015) Remuneration of authors and performers for the use of their works and the fixations of their performances. A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by Europe Economics and IVIR.  +
Guibault et al., Study on the Implementation and Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (2007)  +