https://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&feed=atom&action=historyStobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018) - Revision history2024-03-28T22:54:27ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.2https://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=14952&oldid=prevDietmar at 05:26, 3 November 20222022-11-03T05:26:09Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 05:26, 3 November 2022</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l20" >Line 20:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 20:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Description of Data=Interviews were conducted with 15 cultural heritage institutions across the UK, Netherlands and Italy. The sample was a selection of the largest cultural heritage institutions In each country, institutions that did/did not use the EUIPO database, and other institutions that were representative of their sector. Interviews focussed on a multitude of areas, including copyright knowledge generally, rights clearances, dealing with orphan works, extended collective licensing schemes, staffing and specialised staff availability, etc. <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">TK GLAM</del></div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Description of Data=Interviews were conducted with 15 cultural heritage institutions across the UK, Netherlands and Italy. The sample was a selection of the largest cultural heritage institutions In each country, institutions that did/did not use the EUIPO database, and other institutions that were representative of their sector. Interviews focussed on a multitude of areas, including copyright knowledge generally, rights clearances, dealing with orphan works, extended collective licensing schemes, staffing and specialised staff availability, etc.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Data Type=Primary data</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Data Type=Primary data</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Collection=Semi-Structured Interview</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Collection=Semi-Structured Interview</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=Italy;The Netherlands;United Kingdom</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=Italy;The Netherlands;United Kingdom</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td></tr>
</table>Dietmarhttps://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=14617&oldid=prevNatacha at 08:48, 13 January 20212021-01-13T08:48:07Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:48, 13 January 2021</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l20" >Line 20:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 20:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Description of Data=Interviews were conducted with 15 cultural heritage institutions across the UK, Netherlands and Italy. The sample was a selection of the largest cultural heritage institutions In each country, institutions that did/did not use the EUIPO database, and other institutions that were representative of their sector. Interviews focussed on a multitude of areas, including copyright knowledge generally, rights clearances, dealing with orphan works, extended collective licensing schemes, staffing and specialised staff availability, etc.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Description of Data=Interviews were conducted with 15 cultural heritage institutions across the UK, Netherlands and Italy. The sample was a selection of the largest cultural heritage institutions In each country, institutions that did/did not use the EUIPO database, and other institutions that were representative of their sector. Interviews focussed on a multitude of areas, including copyright knowledge generally, rights clearances, dealing with orphan works, extended collective licensing schemes, staffing and specialised staff availability, etc. <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">TK GLAM</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Data Type=Primary data</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Data Type=Primary data</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Collection=Semi-Structured Interview</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Collection=Semi-Structured Interview</div></td></tr>
</table>Natachahttps://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=12767&oldid=prevAThomas at 13:59, 20 April 20202020-04-20T13:59:04Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:59, 20 April 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2" >Line 2:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Source={{Source</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Source={{Source</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Name of Study=Stobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Name of Study=Stobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Author=<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Victoria </del>Stobo; <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Kristofer </del>Erickson; <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Aura </del>Bertoni; <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Flavia </del>Guerrieri;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Author=Stobo<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, V.</ins>; Erickson<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, K.</ins>; Bertoni<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, A.</ins>; Guerrieri<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, F.</ins>;</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Title=Current Best Practices among Cultural Heritage Institutions when Dealing with Copyright Orphan Works and Analysis of Crowdsourcing Options</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Title=Current Best Practices among Cultural Heritage Institutions when Dealing with Copyright Orphan Works and Analysis of Crowdsourcing Options</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Year=2018</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Year=2018</div></td></tr>
</table>AThomashttps://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=12718&oldid=prevAThomas at 13:30, 20 April 20202020-04-20T13:30:02Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 13:30, 20 April 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l25" >Line 25:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 25:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">UK;</del>Italy;The Netherlands</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=Italy;The Netherlands<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">;United Kingdom</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Comparative=Yes</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Comparative=Yes</div></td></tr>
</table>AThomashttps://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=12565&oldid=prevAThomas at 08:57, 20 April 20202020-04-20T08:57:24Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:57, 20 April 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l14" >Line 14:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 14:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#8226; their collections, their diligent search processes, the results of rights clearance for specific digitization projects, their thoughts on the potential of crowd-sourcing as a solution, and their views on the current legislative framework.”</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#8226; their collections, their diligent search processes, the results of rights clearance for specific digitization projects, their thoughts on the potential of crowd-sourcing as a solution, and their views on the current legislative framework.”</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Link=http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130960/1/EnDOW-Report-3.pdf</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Link=http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130960/1/EnDOW-Report-3.pdf</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Reference=Baldia (2013); Borghi, Erickson and Favale (2016); Stobo, Patterson, Erickson and Deazley (2018);</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Reference=Baldia (2013);Borghi, Erickson and Favale (2016);Stobo, Patterson, Erickson and Deazley (2018);</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Plain Text Proposition=At country level, British cultural heritage institutions seem to have the highest tolerance for risk, with two national libraries digitising works without the assistance of UK or EU legal instruments. Conversely, Italy appears to have the lowest threshold of risk, apparently opting not to digitise, or in doing so only for preservation purposes (e.g. not publicly available).</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Plain Text Proposition=At country level, British cultural heritage institutions seem to have the highest tolerance for risk, with two national libraries digitising works without the assistance of UK or EU legal instruments. Conversely, Italy appears to have the lowest threshold of risk, apparently opting not to digitise, or in doing so only for preservation purposes (e.g. not publicly available).Cultural heritage institutions err towards more conservative approaches to digitisation, noting particularly that negative public perceptions of copyright infringement is an important factor in determining whether to pursue this. This is compounded by the lack of clarity over the requirements for a “diligent search”, and concern that by “crowdsourcing” this requirement would lead to a poor or incorrect finding (in turn compromising the reputation of the institution). Combined with low levels of staff, and particularly so for staff that specialise in copyright issues, the result is a very low uptake of the EUIPO database.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Cultural heritage institutions err towards more conservative approaches to digitisation, noting particularly that negative public perceptions of copyright infringement is an important factor in determining whether to pursue this. This is compounded by the lack of clarity over the requirements for a “diligent search”, and concern that by “crowdsourcing” this requirement would lead to a poor or incorrect finding (in turn compromising the reputation of the institution). Combined with low levels of staff, and particularly so for staff that specialise in copyright issues, the result is a very low uptake of the EUIPO database.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|EvidenceBasedPolicy=C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">,</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|EvidenceBasedPolicy=C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">,</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l27" >Line 27:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 25:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Industry=Cultural education;</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=UK<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">; Netherlands</del>; Italy;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Country=UK;Italy;<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">The Netherlands</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Cross-country=Yes</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Comparative=Yes</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Comparative=Yes</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l34" >Line 34:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 32:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Funded By=Heritage Plus; EU Commission;</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>|Funded By=Heritage Plus; EU Commission;</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">|Dataset=</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td></tr>
</table>AThomashttps://www.copyrightevidence.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stobo,_Erickson,_Bertoni_and_Guerrieri_(2018)&diff=11757&oldid=prevAThomas: Created page with "{{MainSource |Source={{Source |Name of Study=Stobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018) |Author=Victoria Stobo; Kristofer Erickson; Aura Bertoni; Flavia Guerrieri; |Title=C..."2018-09-04T21:32:42Z<p>Created page with "{{MainSource |Source={{Source |Name of Study=Stobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018) |Author=Victoria Stobo; Kristofer Erickson; Aura Bertoni; Flavia Guerrieri; |Title=C..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{MainSource<br />
|Source={{Source<br />
|Name of Study=Stobo, Erickson, Bertoni and Guerrieri (2018)<br />
|Author=Victoria Stobo; Kristofer Erickson; Aura Bertoni; Flavia Guerrieri;<br />
|Title=Current Best Practices among Cultural Heritage Institutions when Dealing with Copyright Orphan Works and Analysis of Crowdsourcing Options<br />
|Year=2018<br />
|Full Citation=Stobo, V., Erickson, K., Bertoni, A. And Guerrieri, F. (2018) Current Best Practices among Cultural Heritage Institutions when Dealing with Copyright Orphan Works and Analysis of Crowdsourcing Options. Report. diligentsearch.eu<br />
|Abstract=“The purpose of this study is to establish the current state of best practices among Cultural Heritage Institutions (CHIs) when dealing with in-copyright orphan works in three countries: the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Italy. A baseline understanding of current practice provides a benchmark against which crowdsourcing (or any other proposal) to address the challenge posed by orphan works can be evaluated. The research team used a purposive sample to approach the ‘Big 3’ national libraries and film archives in each country, typically including the national library, the national archive and the national film archive. The researchers also aimed to include at least <br />
<br />
&#8226; one institution from each jurisdiction that had used the EUIPO database, and one institution that digitized orphan works but opted not to use the database. <br />
<br />
&#8226; 15 cultural institutions are included in the study. A semi-structured interview format was used to gather qualitative and quantitative data about the CHIs, <br />
<br />
&#8226; their collections, their diligent search processes, the results of rights clearance for specific digitization projects, their thoughts on the potential of crowd-sourcing as a solution, and their views on the current legislative framework.”<br />
|Link=http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/130960/1/EnDOW-Report-3.pdf<br />
|Reference=Baldia (2013); Borghi, Erickson and Favale (2016); Stobo, Patterson, Erickson and Deazley (2018);<br />
|Plain Text Proposition=At country level, British cultural heritage institutions seem to have the highest tolerance for risk, with two national libraries digitising works without the assistance of UK or EU legal instruments. Conversely, Italy appears to have the lowest threshold of risk, apparently opting not to digitise, or in doing so only for preservation purposes (e.g. not publicly available).<br />
<br />
Cultural heritage institutions err towards more conservative approaches to digitisation, noting particularly that negative public perceptions of copyright infringement is an important factor in determining whether to pursue this. This is compounded by the lack of clarity over the requirements for a “diligent search”, and concern that by “crowdsourcing” this requirement would lead to a poor or incorrect finding (in turn compromising the reputation of the institution). Combined with low levels of staff, and particularly so for staff that specialise in copyright issues, the result is a very low uptake of the EUIPO database.<br />
|FundamentalIssue=1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare,<br />
|EvidenceBasedPolicy=C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing),<br />
|Discipline=O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital<br />
|Intervention-Response=Whilst repetitional concerns remain important for cultural heritage institutions, there are also economical barriers to dealing with orphan works, including high transaction and administrative costs. The authors submit that crowdsourcing of the diligent search requirement may be the most effective method of encouraging participation with the EUIPO, though note that this also raises issues (e.g. quality assurance burden on the cultural heritage institution).<br />
|Description of Data=Interviews were conducted with 15 cultural heritage institutions across the UK, Netherlands and Italy. The sample was a selection of the largest cultural heritage institutions In each country, institutions that did/did not use the EUIPO database, and other institutions that were representative of their sector. Interviews focussed on a multitude of areas, including copyright knowledge generally, rights clearances, dealing with orphan works, extended collective licensing schemes, staffing and specialised staff availability, etc.<br />
|Data Type=Primary data<br />
|Method of Collection=Semi-Structured Interview<br />
|Method of Analysis=Qualitative Analysis Methods, Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data)<br />
|Industry=Cultural education;<br />
|Country=UK; Netherlands; Italy;<br />
|Cross-country=Yes<br />
|Comparative=Yes<br />
|Government or policy=Yes<br />
|Literature review=No<br />
|Funded By=Heritage Plus; EU Commission;<br />
}}<br />
|Dataset=<br />
}}</div>AThomas