Difference between revisions of "Throsby and Zednik (2010)"
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
|||
(24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Source={{Source | |Source={{Source | ||
|Name of Study=Throsby and Zednik (2010) | |Name of Study=Throsby and Zednik (2010) | ||
− | |Author=Throsby, D. | + | |Author=Throsby, D. ; Zednik, A.; |
|Title=Do You Really Expect To Get Paid?: An Economic Study of Professional Artists in Australia | |Title=Do You Really Expect To Get Paid?: An Economic Study of Professional Artists in Australia | ||
|Year=2010 | |Year=2010 | ||
− | |Full Citation=Throsby, David, and Anita Zednik. | + | |Full Citation=Throsby, David, and Anita Zednik. Do you really expect to get paid?: an economic study of professional artists in Australia. (2010). |
− | |Authentic Link=http:// | + | |Abstract=This study reports the findings of the latest in a series of 5 surveys, conducted between 1983 and 2009, reporting the economic circumstances of professional artists. The surveys were conducted by Macquarie University for the Australia Council of the Arts. The data in this survey was collected in 2009 using the responses of over a thousand professional artists to a detailed questionnaire. The study uses census data to provide demographic information of the artist population in Australia and highlights changes since the previous studies, including a drop in the number of artists recording professional artist as their main occupation. Data from the survey highlights the income disparity between professional artists and the general population, with a mean average income of A$18,900 derived from the artist’s creative work. Survey data also highlights working patterns, time spent on artistic endeavours and career progression. Matters of financial security and income from non-arts sources are also reported. The study also highlights the contribution artists make with their artistic skills in non-artistic industries, and how digital technologies are changing the arts. The report is aimed at policy-makers, bureaucrats, arts organisations, artists themselves and the wider community. |
− | |Link= | + | |Authentic Link=http://australiacouncil.gov.au/workspace/uploads/files/research/do_you_really_expect_to_get_pa-54325a3748d81.pdf |
− | |Data | + | |Link=http://australiacouncil.gov.au/workspace/uploads/files/research/do_you_really_expect_to_get_pa-54325a3748d81.pdf |
+ | |Reference=Throsby (1982);Throsby (1983);Throsby and Hollister (2003);Throsby and Miller (1989);Throsby and Thompson (1994); | ||
+ | |Plain Text Proposition=*Artists in general suffer from low income and financial security*The context of artistic practice is changing due to a more 'portfolio' style of working and also due to the ubiquity of digital technology*Financial security of professional artists is falling*There is a decline in the proportion of artists under 35*Artists increasingly practice their creative talents in no-artistic industries*Women are more likely to earn a low income or be unemployed as professional artists, as are artists from a Non English Speaking Background and artists with a disability*The rise previously observed in the numbers of professional artists has levelled off | ||
+ | |FundamentalIssue=2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?,1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare | ||
+ | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts),D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) | ||
+ | |Discipline=L8: Industry Studies: Services, L80: General, L82: Entertainment • Media | ||
+ | |Intervention-Response=* Financial insecurity among professional artists is a concern* The copyright system may not be providing the remuneration needed to keep artists producing works | ||
+ | |Description of Data=1039 survey questionnaires issued to serious, professional artists (not including those working in film, interior design or architecture). Artists identified using membership lists of Arts organisations and screened to ensure they are currently working in their principle artistic occupation, crosschecked with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Household data. | ||
+ | |Data Year=2009 | ||
+ | |Data Type=Primary and Secondary data | ||
+ | |Data Source=Australian Bureau of Statistics Census 2001, 2006; | ||
+ | |Method of Collection=Quantitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting), Qualitative Collection Methods, Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences), Semi-Structured Interview, Structured Interview | ||
+ | |Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) | ||
+ | |Industry=Creative, arts and entertainment; | ||
|Country=Australia; | |Country=Australia; | ||
|Cross-country=No | |Cross-country=No | ||
Line 16: | Line 29: | ||
|Funded By=Australia Council for the Arts; | |Funded By=Australia Council for the Arts; | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |Dataset= | + | |Dataset={{Dataset |
+ | |Sample Size=1039 | ||
+ | |Level of Aggregation=Artists | ||
+ | |Data Material Year=2009 | ||
+ | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:53, 2 June 2020
Contents
Source Details
Throsby and Zednik (2010) | |
Title: | Do You Really Expect To Get Paid?: An Economic Study of Professional Artists in Australia |
Author(s): | Throsby, D., Zednik, A. |
Year: | 2010 |
Citation: | Throsby, David, and Anita Zednik. Do you really expect to get paid?: an economic study of professional artists in Australia. (2010). |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: | Throsby and Petetskya (2017), Throsby, Zwar and Crosby (2015) |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | 1039 survey questionnaires issued to serious, professional artists (not including those working in film, interior design or architecture). Artists identified using membership lists of Arts organisations and screened to ensure they are currently working in their principle artistic occupation, crosschecked with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Household data. |
Data Type: | Primary and Secondary data |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | No |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | No |
Government or policy study?: | Yes |
Time Period(s) of Collection: |
|
Funder(s): |
|
Abstract
This study reports the findings of the latest in a series of 5 surveys, conducted between 1983 and 2009, reporting the economic circumstances of professional artists. The surveys were conducted by Macquarie University for the Australia Council of the Arts. The data in this survey was collected in 2009 using the responses of over a thousand professional artists to a detailed questionnaire. The study uses census data to provide demographic information of the artist population in Australia and highlights changes since the previous studies, including a drop in the number of artists recording professional artist as their main occupation. Data from the survey highlights the income disparity between professional artists and the general population, with a mean average income of A$18,900 derived from the artist’s creative work. Survey data also highlights working patterns, time spent on artistic endeavours and career progression. Matters of financial security and income from non-arts sources are also reported. The study also highlights the contribution artists make with their artistic skills in non-artistic industries, and how digital technologies are changing the arts. The report is aimed at policy-makers, bureaucrats, arts organisations, artists themselves and the wider community.
Main Results of the Study
- Artists in general suffer from low income and financial security*The context of artistic practice is changing due to a more 'portfolio' style of working and also due to the ubiquity of digital technology*Financial security of professional artists is falling*There is a decline in the proportion of artists under 35*Artists increasingly practice their creative talents in no-artistic industries*Women are more likely to earn a low income or be unemployed as professional artists, as are artists from a Non English Speaking Background and artists with a disability*The rise previously observed in the numbers of professional artists has levelled off
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
- Financial insecurity among professional artists is a concern* The copyright system may not be providing the remuneration needed to keep artists producing works
Coverage of Study
Datasets
Sample size: | 1039 |
Level of aggregation: | Artists |
Period of material under study: | 2009 |