Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Adelstein, R. P. (1) ·
BOP Consulting (1) ·
Bryce, J. (1) ·
DotEcon (1) ·
Favale, M. (1) ·
Goodridge, P. (1) ·
Handke, C. (1) ·
Haskel, J. (1) ·
Homberg, F. (1) ·
Hunt, R. (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Kheria, S. (1) ·
Kretschmer, M. (1) ·
Levin, N. (1) ·
Mendis, D. (2) ·
Miceli, T. J. (1) ·
Mitra-Kahn, B. (1) ·
Nicholas, D. (1) ·
PricewaterhouseCoopers (1) ·
Reeves, P. (1) ·
Ricketson, S. (1) ·
Rowlands, I. (1) ·
Rutter, J. (1) ·
Secchi, D. (2) ·
Towse, R. (2) ·
Waelde, C. (1) ·
Williams, P. (1)
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
A10: General (1) ·
A1: General Economics (1) ·
D23: Organizational Behavior • Transaction Costs • Property Rights (2) ·
D42: Monopoly (2) ·
K11: Property Law (1) ·
K41: Litigation Process (1) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (4) ·
K: Law and Economics (1) ·
L31: Nonprofit Institutions • NGOs (2) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (1) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (9) ·
O38: Government Policy (2) ·
O57: Comparative Studies of Countries (1) ·
Other (13)
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (1) ·
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) (1) ·
Author's Licensing & Collecting Society (1) ·
BPI Annual Yearbook 2013 (1) ·
British Film Institute (1) ·
CISAC Annual Report 2008 (1) ·
CISAC Annual Report 2013 (1) ·
Copyright Licensing Society (1) ·
International treaty (1) ·
Legislative review (1) ·
Literature review (1) ·
OECD (GDP) (1) ·
OFCOM (1) ·
Office for National Statistics (1) ·
PRS for Music (2) ·
Publishers Association (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (2) ·
Torrentfreak (1) ·
UK Film Council (1) ·
US Copyright Office (1) ·
US Supreme Court case (1)
Data collection method:
Case Study (8) ·
Document Research (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (8) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (2) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (4) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (2) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (4) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (5) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (4) ·
Unstructured Interview (3)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (1) ·
Correlation and Association (2) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (3) ·
Discourse Analysis (2) ·
Legal Analysis (3) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (5) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (2) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (6) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (3) ·
Textual Content Analysis (4)
Country:
Government or policy study: (Click arrow to add another value)
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Arts and Humanities Research Council (1) ·
British Phonographic Industry (1) ·
British Video Association (BVA) (1) ·
Business Software Alliance (1) ·
Entertainment & Leisure Software Publishers Association (1) ·
Federation Against Copyright Theft (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (3) ·
Organised Crime Task Force (1) ·
SABIP (1) ·
The Patent Office (1) ·
This Report was prepared for APRA AMCOS, PPCA, Copyright Agency│Viscopy, Foxtel, News Corp Australia and Screenrights. (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (6) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (5) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (3) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (6) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (5)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (5) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (5) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (1) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (5) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (2) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (3)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Case Studies (1) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Collecting society financial data (1) ·
Country (2) ·
Files (1) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Individual (2) ·
Industries (1) ·
Interview (1) ·
Projects (1) ·
Scenario (1) ·
Systems of fair use in copyright (1) ·
Texts (1) ·
Treaty (1) ·
Websites (1) ·
case study (1) ·
fair use systems in copyright (1)
Data material year:
Data industry:
Advertising (1) ·
Computer programming (1) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (8) ·
Cultural education (1) ·
Film and motion pictures (7) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (1) ·
Photographic activities (2) ·
Programming and broadcasting (4) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (7) ·
Software publishing (4) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (10) ·
Specialised design (2) ·
Television programmes (5)
Showing below up to 13 results in range #1 to #13.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
B
F
G
H
H cont.
I
M
P
