Semantic search

From Copyright EVIDENCE
 Citation
Hackett (2015)
Hagedoorn and Ridder (2012)Hagedoorn, J., & Ridder, A. K. (2012). Open innovation, contracts, and intellectual property rights: an exploratory empirical study.
Handke (2012a)Handke, C. (2012). A Taxonomy of Empirical Research on Copyright-How Do We Inform Policy?. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 9(1), pp.47-92.
Handke and Towse (2007)Handke, Christian, and Ruth Towse. Economics of copyright collecting societies. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 38.8 (2007): 937-957.
Handke, Girard and Mattes (2015)Handke, C., Girard, Y., & Mattes, A. (2015). Copyright and Innovation: Fit for Digitization?. DIW Economic Bulletin, 5(16).
Hansen, Hinze, and Urban (2013)Hansen, D. R., Hinze, G., & Urban, J. M. (2013). Orphan Works and the Search for Rightsholders: Who Participates in a'Diligent Search'under Present and Proposed Regimes?. Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project, White Paper, (4)
Harbaugh and Khemka (2010)Harbaugh, Rick, and Rahul Khemka. Does Copyright Enforcement Encourage Piracy?. The Journal of Industrial Economics 58.2 (2010): 306-323.
IP Crime Annual Report (2013-2014)IP Crime Group (2014). IP Crime Annual Report (2013-2014).
IP Crime Annual Report (2014-2015)IP Crime Group (2015). IP Crime Annual Report (2014-2015).
Intellectual Property Office (2018)Intellectual Property Office (2018) Copyright term extension for sound recordings Post-Implementation Review
Kretschmer (2011)Kretschmer, M. (2011). Private copying and fair compensation
Kretschmer, Deazley, Edwards, Erickson, Schafer and Zizzo (2014)Kretschmer, M., Deazley, R., Edwards, L., Erickson, K., Schafer, B., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). The European Commission's Public Consultation on the Review of EU Copyright Rules: A Response by the CREATe Centre. European Intellectual Property Review, 36(9), 547-553.
Kretschmer, Klimis, and Wallis (2001)Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G. M., & Wallis, R. (2001). Music in Electronic Markets An Empirical Study. New Media & Society, 3(4), 417-441.
Lerner (2002)Lerner, J. (2002). Patent protection and innovation over 150 years (No. w8977). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mendis, Secchi and Reeves (2015)Mendis, D., et al. (2015). A Legal and Empirical Study into the Intellectual Property Implications of 3D Printing.
Merz (2005)Merz, J. F. (2005). Intellectual Property and Product Development Public/Private Partnerships. Intellectual Property and Product Development Public/Private Partnerships.
Mezei and Harkai (2022)Mezei, P. Harkai, I. (2022). End-User Flexibilities in Digital Copyright Law – An Empirical Analysis of End-user License Agreements. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 5(1), p. 2-21.
Moreno and Sepúlveda (2021)Moreno, J. and Sepúlveda, R. (2021) Article 13 on social media and news media: disintermediation and reintermediation on the modern media landscape. Communication & Society 34(2), pp 141-157
Morrison and Secker (2015)Morrison, C. and Secker, J., 2015. Copyright Literacy in the UK: a survey of librarians and other cultural heritage sector professionals. Library and Information Research, 39(121), pp.75-97.
Mustonen (2005)Mustonen, Mikko. When does a firm support substitute open source programming?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 14.1 (2005): 121-139.
Noto La Diega (2019)Noto La Diega, G. (2019) Can the law fix the problems of fashion? An empirical study on social norms and power imbalance in the fashion industry. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14(1), pp18-24
OHIM (2016)OHIM (2016) Digital Advertising on Suspected Infringing Websites
Pascault et al. (2020)Pascault, L., Jütte, B.J., Noto La Diega, G. and Priora, G. (2020) Copyright and Remote Teaching in the Time of COVID-19: A Study of Contractual Terms and Conditions of Selected Online Services. European Intellectual Property Review, 42 (9), pp. 548-555
Peukert, Claussen and Kretschmer (2015)Peukert, C., Claussen, J. and Kretschmer, T., 2015. Piracy and box office movie revenues: Evidence from megaupload. Available at SSRN 2176246.
Pollock (2009)Pollock, R. 2009. “Forever Minus a Day? Calculating Optimal Copyright Term”. Review of Economic Researchon CopyrightIssues 6(1); 35-60.
Poole (2010)Poole, N. (2010). The Cost of Digitising Europe’s Cultural Heritage A Report for the Comité des Sages of the European Commission.
Quintais, De Gregorio and Magalhaes (2023)Quintais, J. P., De Gregorio, G., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). How platforms govern users’ copyright-protected content: Exploring the power of private ordering and its implications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48.
Quiring, Von Walter and Atterer (2008)Quiring, O., Von Walter, B., & Atterer, R. (2008). Can filesharers be triggered by economic incentives? Results of an experiment. New Media & Society, 10(3), 433-453.
Raustiala and Sprigman (2006)Raustiala, K. and Sprigman, C.J. (2006) The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, 1687-1777
Reda (2015)Reda, J., Draft Report on the Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament (2014/2256(INI)).
Rendas (2017)Rendas, T. (2017) Copyright, Technology and the CJEU: An Empirical Study. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC), Forthcoming
Shavell and van Ypersele (1999)Shavell, S. and Van Ypersele, T., 1999. Rewards versus intellectual property rights (No. w6956). National bureau of economic research.
Siponen, Vance and Willison (2012)Siponen, M., Vance, A., & Willison, R. (2012). New insights into the problem of software piracy: The effects of neutralization, shame, and moral beliefs. Information & Management, 49(7), 334-341.
Sprigman (2017)Sprigman, C.J. (2017) Copyright and Creative Incentives: What we Know (And Don’t). Houston Law Review, Vol. 55, No.2 , 451-478
Thomes (2013)Thomes, Tim Paul. An economic analysis of online streaming music services. Information Economics and Policy 25.2 (2013): 81-91.
Towse (2013)Towse, Ruth. The economic effects of digitization on the administration of musical copyrights. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 10.2 (2013): 55-67.
Towse (2018)Towse (2018) Copyright Reversion in The Creative Industries: Economics and Fair Remuneration. 41 Colum J.L. & Arts 467
United States Copyright Office (2015b)Orphan Works and Mass Digitization, United States Copyright Office (2015), available at http://copyright.gov/orphan/reports/orphan-works2015.pdf.
Van Eechoud (2017)van Eechoud, M (2017), A publisher’s intellectual property right: implications for freedom of expression, authors and open content policies, Research paper for OpenForum Europe: https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/OFE_Implications_of_publishers_right.pdf
Vetulani (2008)Vetulani, A. (2008). ’The Problem of Orphan Works in the EU–an overview of legislative solutions and main actions in this field. Rapport for European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Unit E, 4.
Vuopala (2010)Vuopala, A., 2010. Assessment of the Orphan works issue and Costs for Rights Clearance. European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Unit E, 4.
Waelde and MacQueen (2004)Waelde C. and MacQueen H., From entertainment to education: the scope of copyright? (2004) Intellectual Property Quarterly
Watt (2009)Watt, Richard. An Empirical Analysis of the Economics of Copyright: How Valid are the Results of Studies in Developed Countries for Developing Countries?. The Economics of Intellectual Property (2009): 65.
Zhu, Madnick and Siegel (2008)Zhu, Hongwei, Stuart E. Madnick, and Michael D. Siegel. An economic analysis of policies for the protection and reuse of noncopyrightable database contents. Journal of Management Information Systems 25.1 (2008): 199-232.