Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data analysis method:
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) 
& Cross country study:
No
& Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
& Cross country study:
No
& Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
A13: Relation of Economics to Social Values (1) ·
A14: Sociology of Economics (1) ·
C02: Mathematical Methods (1) ·
C81: Methodology for Collecting; Estimating; and Organizing Microeconomic Data • Data Access (1) ·
C88: Other Computer Software (1) ·
D23: Organizational Behavior • Transaction Costs • Property Rights (1) ·
D42: Monopoly (1) ·
D83: Search • Learning • Information and Knowledge • Communication • Belief (1) ·
D8: Information; Knowledge; and Uncertainty (1) ·
D: Microeconomics (1) ·
E24: Employment • Unemployment • Wages • Intergenerational Income Distribution • Aggregate Human Capital (1) ·
I23: Higher Education • Research Institutions (1) ·
J30: General (1) ·
J3: Wages; Compensation; and Labor Costs (1) ·
K00: General (1) ·
K0: General (2) ·
K11: Property Law (3) ·
K12: Contract Law (1) ·
K14: Criminal Law (1) ·
K2: Regulation and Business Law (1) ·
K41: Litigation Process (1) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (3) ·
L17: Open Source Products and Markets (2) ·
L82: Entertainment • Media (6) ·
L86: Information and Internet Services • Computer Software (2) ·
L8: Industry Studies: Services (1) ·
M52: Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects (1) ·
M59: Other (1) ·
O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives (2) ·
O32: Management of Technological Innovation and R&D (1) ·
O33: Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion Processes (11) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (25) ·
O38: Government Policy (7) ·
O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights (5) ·
Y1: Data: Tables and Charts (1) ·
Z11: Economics of the Arts and Literature (1) ·
Z13: Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology • Social and Economic Stratification (1) ·
Z1: Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology (1) ·
Other (31)
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
ALCS survey 2007 (1) ·
ALCS survey 2015 (1) ·
Australia Bureau of Statistics (1) ·
BigChampagne (1) ·
Billboard Chart (1) ·
BitTorrent protocol of all torrents between 2004 and 2013 (1) ·
Companies’ SEC annual report filings (1) ·
Digital Citizen Project (1) ·
Financial data from COMPUSTAT’s Fundamental Annuals (1) ·
Haverman (2004): Antebellum literary culture and the evolution of American magazines (1) ·
IMDb (1) ·
LexisNexis (1) ·
Nielsen SoundScan (1) ·
Pollstar (1) ·
RIAA (1) ·
Recording Industry Association of America (1) ·
Twitter (1) ·
US Copyright Office (1) ·
US Patent and Trademark Office (1) ·
WinMX (1) ·
YouTube (1)
Data collection method:
Archival Research (1) ·
Case Study (7) ·
Document Research (3) ·
Experimental (Field) (1) ·
Longitudinal Study (4) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (17) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (9) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (22) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (21) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (6) ·
Snowball sampling (1) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (7) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (9) ·
Unstructured Interview (1) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (6)
Data analysis method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Country:
Cross country study: (Click arrow to add another value)
Time period of data collection:
1 October 1999 - 15 February 2000. (1) ·
1 October 2018 – 30 April 2019 (1) ·
1890 - 1964 (1) ·
1984 - 2013 (1) ·
199-2000 (1) ·
1991-2007 (1) ·
1996-2006 (1) ·
1997 to 2000 (1) ·
1997-2009 (1) ·
1999-2000 (1) ·
2000,2005, and 2013 (1) ·
2000-2012 (1) ·
2001 (1) ·
2001-2002 (2) ·
2002 (1) ·
2003-2004 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2007 (1) ·
2007 to 2008 (1) ·
2007 to 2009 (1) ·
2008 to 2009 (1) ·
2009 - 2012 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2014 (1) ·
2015 (2) ·
April 2004 - July 2004 (1) ·
April 2007 (1) ·
Not specified (1) ·
September 2002 - March 2003 (1)
Funder:
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1) ·
Authors’ Licensing & Collecting Society (ALCS) (1) ·
Boston Consulting Group (1) ·
Comissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board, Library of Congress (1) ·
Creative Content Australia (1) ·
GE Endowed Professor Fund (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (1) ·
Shenkman Family Endowed Chair fund (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
Treibick Electronic Commerce Initiative (1) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
We
thank
the
National
Human
Genome
Research
Initiative
for
a
generous
grant
supporting
this
work (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (19) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (6) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (13) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (21) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (8)
Evidence Based Policies: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Articles (1) ·
Books (2) ·
Case Study (2) ·
Cases (1) ·
Court cases (1) ·
Cultural Heritage Institutions (4) ·
Documents (1) ·
Hour (1) ·
Individual (5) ·
Individual Staff (1) ·
Individuals (2) ·
Journals (1) ·
Magazines (1) ·
Music albums (1) ·
News articles (1) ·
Open Source Software (1) ·
P2P communication events (1) ·
P2P users (1) ·
Price observations (1) ·
Publications (1) ·
Publishers (1) ·
Software Users (1) ·
Sound recordings (1) ·
Tweets (1) ·
Videos (1) ·
Work made for hire cases (1) ·
Workers (1) ·
book titles (1) ·
songs (1)
Data material year:
1 October 2018 – 30 April 2019 (1) ·
1741-1860 (1) ·
1890 and 1964 (1) ·
1956-59 and from 1963-66 (1) ·
1974-81 and 1983-86 (1) ·
1984 to 2013 (1) ·
1989-2014 (1) ·
1990 to 2011 (1) ·
1997 to 2000 (1) ·
1999-2000 (1) ·
2000-2012 (1) ·
2001 (1) ·
2002 (1) ·
2002 to 2004 (1) ·
2003 (1) ·
2004 to 2005 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2006 (1) ·
2007 (1) ·
2007 to 2008 (1) ·
2007 to 2009 (1) ·
2008 to 2009 (1) ·
2009 (1) ·
2009 to 2012 (1) ·
2012 (1) ·
2013 (1) ·
April 2007 (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Publications of NYT bestselling authors who died between 1973-1999 (1) ·
Reviewed by the New York Times Book Review (NYTBR) from 1978-84 (1)
Data industry:
Creative, arts and entertainment (6) ·
Cultural education (9) ·
Film and motion pictures (4) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (7) ·
Photographic activities (4) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (15) ·
Software publishing (5) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (8) ·
Television programmes (3)
Showing below up to 31 results in range #1 to #31.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
