Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Data collection method 
:
Participant Observation or
Quantitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences)
& Data analysis method:
Legal Analysis
:
Participant Observation or
Quantitative Collection Methods or
Quantitative data/text mining or
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences)
& Data analysis method:
Legal Analysis Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Artnet (1) ·
CJEU website (1) ·
CNC (1) ·
CPA (2002) (1) ·
Case law (1) ·
Center for Research in Security Prices (1) ·
Copyright Levies Reform Alliance (1) ·
Data.gov.uk (1) ·
ECJ (1) ·
European Commission (1) ·
Legislative review (1) ·
Literature review (1) ·
Miller, P (2012) Thinking about Open Data, With a Little Help from the Data Hub. Cloud of Data (1) ·
Médiamétrie (1) ·
NACE classification (1) ·
National studies (1) ·
Nokia (1) ·
OTA (1986) (1) ·
Open letter from Steve Jobs and response from Tim Amoroso from Macrovision (1) ·
PRODCOM (1) ·
Rentrak (1) ·
Revenue data (1) ·
Review of Existing Academic and Industries Literature (2) ·
SHERPA institutional repository list (1) ·
ScreenDaily.com (1) ·
Statutory exceptions (1) ·
The Directory of Open Access Repositories (1) ·
The United States Supreme Court Judicial Database (1) ·
US Federal Court Decisions (1) ·
Various (1) ·
WIPO (1989) (1) ·
YOUNISON (1)
Data collection method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data analysis method: (Click arrow to add another value)
Country:
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Australian Government (1) ·
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (1) ·
Comissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board, Library of Congress (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant RES-173-27-0220) (1) ·
European Commission (8) ·
European Parliament (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (3) ·
JISC (1) ·
None (1) ·
Not stated (8) ·
Office of the United States Trade Representative (1) ·
Queen Elizabeth Scholar programme (1) ·
SABIP (1) ·
The Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
The financial support for this project was given by the Leverholm Trust and the Herchel Smith Intellectual Property Research Fund, Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge (1) ·
UK Economic and Social Research Council (1) ·
United Nations (1) ·
United States Copyright Office (4) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (3) ·
de Thuiskopie (1) ·
openAir - African Innovation Research (1) ·
the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (1) ·
the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (52) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (12) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (9) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (37) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (22)
Evidence Based Policies:
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (17) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (25) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (15) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (26) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (13) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (26)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
1890 and 1964 (1) ·
1910 to 1960 (1) ·
1956-59 and from 1963-66 (1) ·
1974-81 and 1983-86 (1) ·
1978 to 2005 (1) ·
1984 to 2013 (1) ·
1990 to 2011 (1) ·
1991-2006 (1) ·
1994-2014 (1) ·
1998 to 2013 (1) ·
2000 (1) ·
2001 to 2003 (1) ·
2003 (1) ·
2003-2009 (1) ·
2005 to 2006 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2006 (2) ·
2007 (1) ·
2007 to 2009 (1) ·
2008 (1) ·
2008 to 2009 (1) ·
2008 to 2014 (1) ·
2009 (2) ·
2010 (3) ·
2011 (1) ·
2012 (4) ·
2012-2013 (3) ·
2013 (8) ·
2014 (4) ·
2014-2015 (2) ·
2015 (2) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Publications of NYT bestselling authors who died between 1973-1999 (1) ·
Reviewed by the New York Times Book Review (NYTBR) from 1978-84 (1) ·
The cut-off date for analysis is the end of the 2008 calendar year, although some 2009 data has been included where available and appropriate. (1) ·
The empirical dataset consists of 446 federal copyright publication opinions decided before 2011. (1) ·
Usage of the Universities learn-management-system in 2012. (1)
Data industry:
Advertising (3) ·
Architectural (4) ·
Computer programming (2) ·
Creative, arts and entertainment (26) ·
Cultural education (12) ·
Film and motion pictures (15) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (9) ·
Photographic activities (10) ·
Programming and broadcasting (4) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (20) ·
Software publishing (11) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (25) ·
Specialised design (4) ·
Television programmes (13) ·
Translation and interpretation (1) ·
Video game publishing (1)
Showing below up to 66 results in range #1 to #66.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Akester (2009)
- Asser Institute and IViR (2014)
- Attorney-General's Department (2008)
- Australian Law Reform Commission (2013)
B
- Bechtold (2013)
- Beebe (2008)
- Bellégo and Nijs (2020)
- Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara and Marsden (2006b)
- Brooks (2005)
C
- Canat, Guibault and Logeais (2015)
- Charles River Associates (2013)
- Corbett (2011)
- Cotropia and Gibson (2014)
- Coyle, Gould, Gupta and Gupta (2009)
D
- David (1993)
- De Beer and Bouchard (2010)
- Depoorter (2019)
- Depoorter and Walker (2013)
- Depoorter, Van Hiel and Vanneste (2011)
- Dickson (2010)
- Dryden (2008)
E
E cont.
- European Commission (2011a)
- European Commission (2014)
- European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (2010)
- European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs (2015)
F
- Favale (2020)
- Favale, Homberg, Kretschmer, Mendis and Secchi (2013)
- Flaherty (2020)
- Fromer and Lemley (2013)
G
- Gerhardt (2014)
- Goel, Miesing and Chandra (2010)
- Graham (2016)
- Greenhalgh, Phillips, Pitkethly, Rogers and Tomalin (2010)
- Guadamuz and Cabell (2014)
- Guibault, Westkamp and Rieber-Mohn (2007)
H
- Hansen, Hashimoto, Hinze, Samuelson and Urban (2013)
- Heald (2014a)
- Heald (2017a)
- Heald, Erickson and Kretschmer (2015)
- Heredia-Carroza, Palma and Aguado (2019)
- Humphreys, Fitzgerald, Banks, Suzor (2008)
I
K
L
M
O
P
- Picard, Toivonen and Grönlund (2003)
- Pritcher (2000)
- Public and Corporate Economic Consultants (2013)
R
S
U
- United States Copyright Office (2013a)
- United States Copyright Office (2013b)
- United States Copyright Office (2015a)
- United States Copyright Office (2015b)
W
