Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Literature review:
No 
& Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
& Data industry :
Cultural education or
Software publishing
& Evidence Based Policies:
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
& Data industry :
Cultural education or
Software publishing Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Year:
Related to:
Discipline:
Data Type:
Secondary Data Source:
Data collection method:
Archival Research (2) ·
Case Study (10) ·
Document Research (11) ·
Ethnography (1) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Historical Methods (1) ·
Longitudinal Study (3) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (23) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (8) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (33) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (21) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (11) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (19) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (25) ·
Unstructured Interview (4) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (8)
Data analysis method:
Cluster analysis (4) ·
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (1) ·
Correlation and Association (10) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (29) ·
Discourse Analysis (1) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (2) ·
Factor Analysis (1) ·
Grounded Theory (1) ·
Legal Analysis (16) ·
Meta-Analysis (2) ·
Multivariate Statistics (7) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (20) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (11) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (32) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (22) ·
Regression Analysis (11) ·
Social Network Analysis (1) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (3) ·
Textual Content Analysis (24)
Country:
Literature review: (Click arrow to add another value)
Time period of data collection:
Funder:
Berkeley Center for Law & Technology and the Case Western Reserve University Active Learning Fellowship (1) ·
Boston Consulting Group (1) ·
Brittany Regional Council (1) ·
CAIW (1) ·
Commonwealth of Australia (1) ·
Delta (1) ·
Dutch Ministries of Education, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs and Justice. (1) ·
European Commission (6) ·
European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (1) ·
European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 611988 (1) ·
Flemish Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology (1) ·
IPO (3) ·
Intellectual Property Institute (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
International Intellectual Property Alliance (1) ·
JISC (1) ·
John D. Evans Foundation (1) ·
KPN (1) ·
Naval Academy Research Council Grant (1) ·
Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (1) ·
Not stated (4) ·
Open Society Institute (1) ·
OpenDataMonitor Project (1) ·
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1) ·
Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (1) ·
Royal Dutch Book Trade Association (1) ·
Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (1) ·
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the doctoral fellowship and the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries for the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship that covered the costs of data collection. (1) ·
The author gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the New Zealand Law Foundation for this research project. (1) ·
We
thank
the
National
Human
Genome
Research
Initiative
for
a
generous
grant
supporting
this
work (1) ·
Wellcome Trust (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
World Intellectual Property Organization (2) ·
XS4ALL (1) ·
Ziggo (1)
Fundamental Issues:
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (45) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (8) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (12) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (37) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (30)
Evidence Based Policies: (Click arrow to add another value)
Data sample size:
Data unit of assessment:
Data material year:
Data industry: (Click arrow to add another value)
Showing below up to 67 results in range #1 to #67.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
B
- Baghestan et al. (2019)
- Baker and Cunningham (2006)
- Band (2013b)
- Bessen (2005)
- Borghi, Maggiolino, Montagnani and Nuccio (2012)
C
- Camerani, Grassano, Chavarro and Tang (2013)
- Cave, Deegan and Heinink (2000)
- Cheng, Sims and Teegen (1997)
- Corbett (2011)
D
E
F
G
G cont.
H
- Haefliger, Jäger and Von Krogh (2010)
- Haveman and Kluttz (2014)
- Heimstädt, Saunderson and Heath (2014)
- Hill (2013)
- Hong (2007)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012a)
- Hooper and Lynch (2012b)
- Hudson and Kenyon (2007)
- Huygen, Helberger, Poort, Rutten and Van Eijk (2009)
K
L
- Lakhani and Von Hippel (2003)
- Larsson, Svensson, Mezei and De Kaminski (2014)
- Lemley and Shafir (2011)
- Lin (2019)
M
O
P
P cont.
- Perzanowski and Hoofnagle (2017)
- Picard, Toivonen and Grönlund (2003)
- Poort and Leenheer (2012)
- Pénard, Dejean and Suire (2011)
S
- Secker, Gadd and Morrison (2019)
- Seng (2015)
- Shmatkov (2020)
- Sinnreich et al. (2020)
- Siwek (2009)
- Somaya and Grahan (2006)
- Stratton (2011)
T
V
- Van Alsenoy, Verdoodt, Heyman, Ausloos, Waters and Acar (2015)
- Van Eijk, Poort and Rutten (2010)
- Vuopala (2010)
W
X
