Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Studies > Year :
1970 or
1989 or
2004 or
2014 or
2020
& Data industry :
Creative, arts and entertainment or
PR and communication
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Author:
Related to:
Discipline:
All Japan Magazine and Book Publisher’s and Editor’s Association (1) ·
Australian Society of Authors (1) ·
Billboard Hot 100 (1) ·
CJEU website (1) ·
CNC (1) ·
Clarivate Web of Science (1) ·
DMCA (1) ·
German Legal Database "beck-online" (1) ·
Google (1) ·
Google Scholar (1) ·
Google Trends (1) ·
Literature review (2) ·
Lunney (2014) (1) ·
Médiamétrie (1) ·
None stated (1) ·
Operabase (1) ·
Rentrak (1) ·
ScreenDaily.com (1) ·
Singapore Department of Statistics (1) ·
Singapore Economic Development Board (1) ·
US Copyright Office (1) ·
Various (1) ·
While Scopus (1) ·
Yano Research Institute (1)
Case Study (2) ·
Document Research (3) ·
Ethnography (1) ·
Experimental (Laboratory) (2) ·
Experimental (Natural) (1) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Participant Observation (1) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (7) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (2) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (12) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (4) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (7) ·
Snowball sampling (1) ·
Structured Interview (4) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (7) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (9) ·
Unstructured Interview (4) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (3)
Correlation and Association (3) ·
Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation) (10) ·
Discourse Analysis (3) ·
Ethnographic/narrative analysis (1) ·
Factor Analysis (2) ·
Grounded Theory (1) ·
Legal Analysis (6) ·
Multivariate Statistics (4) ·
Qualitative Analysis Methods (8) ·
Qualitative Coding / Sorting (e.g. of interview data) (7) ·
Quantitative Analysis Methods (12) ·
Quantitative content analysis (e.g. text or data mining) (5) ·
Regression Analysis (7) ·
Structural Equation Modeling (1) ·
Textual Content Analysis (4) ·
Triangulation (1)
1998-2015 (1) ·
1999-2010 (1) ·
2004 - 2019 (1) ·
2005 to 2008 (1) ·
2007-2011 (1) ·
2011 (1) ·
2011-2019 (1) ·
2012 – 2013 (1) ·
2012-2013 (1) ·
2014 (6) ·
2014 - 2017 (1) ·
2016-2017 (1) ·
2017 – 2018 (1) ·
2020 (1) ·
Between 15 March 2004 and 15 April 2004 (1) ·
December 2003 (1) ·
First week of every month from 1985 - 2013 (1) ·
March 15-April 15 2004 (1) ·
Not Specified (1) ·
Not stated (2) ·
Not stated. The study focuses, with a few exceptions, on the literature of the last decade. (1) ·
November 18-December 14, 2003. (1) ·
November 2018 - January 2019 (1)
ARC Discovery Projects (1) ·
Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship (1) ·
CREATe (1) ·
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (1) ·
Fulbright Senior Research grant (1) ·
Google (1) ·
IPO (1) ·
Intellectual Property Institute (1) ·
Mellon Foundation (1) ·
Not Stated (1) ·
Not stated (1) ·
Pew Internet and American Life Project (1) ·
Queen Elizabeth Scholar programme (1) ·
The Pew Charitable Trusts (1) ·
The authors acknowledge the George Mason University’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and its Leonardo da Vinci Research (1) ·
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 23243042, 24730212. (1) ·
University of Houston Law Center’s Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law’s 2012-2013 Sponsored Scholarship Grant for the Legal Academy (1) ·
openAir - African Innovation Research (1) ·
the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (1) ·
the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (21) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (15) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (5) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (8) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (12)
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (13) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (9) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (3) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (11) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (10) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (15)
Academic article (1) ·
Art Market Professionals (1) ·
Artists (1) ·
Case study (1) ·
Collecting Societies (1) ·
Copyright Law Suits (1) ·
Creators (1) ·
Individual (4) ·
Interviewed author (1) ·
Librarians (1) ·
Museums (1) ·
Musician or songwriter (1) ·
Musicians and Songwriters (1) ·
Online surveyed author (1) ·
Performances (1) ·
Songs (1) ·
Takedown notices (1) ·
Takedown requests (1) ·
US Copyright Office Registrations (1) ·
University students (1) ·
Work made for hire cases (1)
Showing below up to 33 results in range #1 to #33.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)