Difference between revisions of "Derclaye (2014)"
m (1 revision imported) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Full Citation=Derclaye, E. (2014). Do patents, trademarks and designs foster happiness in developed countries? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 357-368. | |Full Citation=Derclaye, E. (2014). Do patents, trademarks and designs foster happiness in developed countries? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 357-368. | ||
|Abstract=Intellectual property rights are exclusive rights the law gives to authors and inventors to stimulate creativity and innovation. Intellectual property laws’ justification assumes that the more creations and inventions there are, the better off the population is. Therefore, the law promotes innovation and creativity without limits. This paper challenges this assumption by analysing empirically data on patents, trademarks and designs and on life satisfaction. It finds that there is no correlation between trademarks and designs and life satisfaction but a strong correlation between patents and life satisfaction. However passed a certain point, it is unclear whether more patents make people happier. | |Abstract=Intellectual property rights are exclusive rights the law gives to authors and inventors to stimulate creativity and innovation. Intellectual property laws’ justification assumes that the more creations and inventions there are, the better off the population is. Therefore, the law promotes innovation and creativity without limits. This paper challenges this assumption by analysing empirically data on patents, trademarks and designs and on life satisfaction. It finds that there is no correlation between trademarks and designs and life satisfaction but a strong correlation between patents and life satisfaction. However passed a certain point, it is unclear whether more patents make people happier. | ||
+ | |Authentic Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2337725 | ||
|Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2337725 | |Link=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2337725 | ||
|Reference=Landes and Posner (2003); | |Reference=Landes and Posner (2003); | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
|EvidenceBasedPolicy=D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability), | |EvidenceBasedPolicy=D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability), | ||
|Discipline=A1: General Economics, A10: General, K: Law and Economics, K0: General | |Discipline=A1: General Economics, A10: General, K: Law and Economics, K0: General | ||
+ | |Intervention-Response=The writers' main conclusion is that there is an increase in the happiness of countries when more patents are introduced and this limit on happiness occurs at some point and thereafter levels off or declines. This may mean that patents are a way to increase the happiness in a country but only up a certain point. | ||
|Description of Data=This paper looks at the data only in developed countries where the number of patents,trademarks and designs should be relatively high in view of their state of development. | |Description of Data=This paper looks at the data only in developed countries where the number of patents,trademarks and designs should be relatively high in view of their state of development. | ||
|Data Year=2006 | |Data Year=2006 | ||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
|Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation), Regression Analysis | |Method of Analysis=Quantitative Analysis Methods, Descriptive statistics (counting; means reporting; cross-tabulation), Regression Analysis | ||
|Industry=Software publishing (including video games); | |Industry=Software publishing (including video games); | ||
+ | |Country=OECD; | ||
|Cross-country=Yes | |Cross-country=Yes | ||
|Comparative=No | |Comparative=No | ||
+ | |Government or policy=No | ||
+ | |Literature review=No | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |Dataset={{Dataset | ||
+ | |Sample Size=25 | ||
+ | |Level of Aggregation=Country, | ||
+ | |Data Material Year=2013 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:08, 18 October 2016
Contents
Source Details
Derclaye (2014) | |
Title: | Do patents, trademarks and designs foster happiness in developed countries? An empirical analysis |
Author(s): | Derclaye, E. |
Year: | 2014 |
Citation: | Derclaye, E. (2014). Do patents, trademarks and designs foster happiness in developed countries? An empirical analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 357-368. |
Link(s): | Definitive , Open Access |
Key Related Studies: | |
Discipline: | |
Linked by: |
About the Data | |
Data Description: | This paper looks at the data only in developed countries where the number of patents,trademarks and designs should be relatively high in view of their state of development. |
Data Type: | Secondary data |
Secondary Data Sources: | |
Data Collection Methods: | |
Data Analysis Methods: | |
Industry(ies): | |
Country(ies): | |
Cross Country Study?: | Yes |
Comparative Study?: | No |
Literature review?: | No |
Government or policy study?: | No |
Time Period(s) of Collection: |
|
Funder(s): |
Abstract
Intellectual property rights are exclusive rights the law gives to authors and inventors to stimulate creativity and innovation. Intellectual property laws’ justification assumes that the more creations and inventions there are, the better off the population is. Therefore, the law promotes innovation and creativity without limits. This paper challenges this assumption by analysing empirically data on patents, trademarks and designs and on life satisfaction. It finds that there is no correlation between trademarks and designs and life satisfaction but a strong correlation between patents and life satisfaction. However passed a certain point, it is unclear whether more patents make people happier.
Main Results of the Study
The main conclusion is however that there is an increase in the happiness of countries when more patents are introduced and this limit on happiness occurs at some point and thereafter levels off or declines. This may mean that patents are a way to increase the happiness in a country but only up a certain point. Future research will be directed at trying to understand why increasing the number of patents per person beyond 104.6 does not lead to an increase in the happiness in the country.
Policy Implications as Stated By Author
The writers' main conclusion is that there is an increase in the happiness of countries when more patents are introduced and this limit on happiness occurs at some point and thereafter levels off or declines. This may mean that patents are a way to increase the happiness in a country but only up a certain point.
Coverage of Study
Datasets
Sample size: | 25 |
Level of aggregation: | Country |
Period of material under study: | 2013 |